On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199364
> >
> > It fixes the long standing problem of file dialog in VirtualBox UI under
> > kde.
>
> Done.
>
> --
> p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372
Hi!
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199364
>
> It fixes the long standing problem of file dialog in VirtualBox UI under
> kde.
Done.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 4 years to go !
___
On Tuesday, 10 May 2016 at 10:03:24 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> I'm unable to get databases/mariadb100-client to compile on 10-stable/amd64.
> It fails as follows:
>
> Scanning dependencies of target mysqlclient
> gmake[4]: Leaving directory
>
I'm unable to get databases/mariadb100-client to compile on 10-stable/amd64.
It fails as follows:
Scanning dependencies of target mysqlclient
gmake[4]: Leaving directory
'/var/obj/usr/ports/databases/mariadb100-client/work/mariadb-10.0.25'
gmake[4]: Entering directory
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199364
It fixes the long standing problem of file dialog in VirtualBox UI under
kde.
Thanks,
Yuri
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
У Вас 1 новое сообщение
От кого: Людмила Костюкевич
Тема: Aптekа Oнлайн B Твоeм Городe
Сообщение:
Дженерики с aнoнимнoй дoстaвкoй нa дoм круглoсутoчнo
Подробнее
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Вы можете ограничить или отменить уведомления на
E-Mail в Настройках оповещений
El 9/5/2016 20:15, "Kurt Jaeger" escribió:
>
> Hi!
>
> > Is it safe to use different invocations of poudriere concurrently for
> > different jails but using the same ports collection?
>
> Yes.
Terrific, thanks!
>
> --
> p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372
On 05/09/16 19:52, Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is it safe to use different invocations of poudriere concurrently for
> different jails but using the same ports collection?
>
Yes it is, or at least should be.
The ports trees are mounted read only in the jails, the wrkdir is
defined
Hi!
> Is it safe to use different invocations of poudriere concurrently for
> different jails but using the same ports collection?
Yes.
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 4 years to go !
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
¿Requiere la información a la brevedad? , responda este email con la palabra
Gerentes.
Centro telefónico: 018002129393.
Usted podrá cursar esta capacitación ONLINE en Vivo desde la comodidad de su
casa u oficina con todas las ventajas que le ofrece un curso presencial de
manera remota, ¡y en
Hi all,
Is it safe to use different invocations of poudriere concurrently for
different jails but using the same ports collection?
Thanks
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
Hello FreeBSD porters,
FYI: here's a new OpenBSD port which you may be interested in adapting:
(I'm not subscribed to your list, but feel free to email me.)
Cheers.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 23:27:04 +0100
From: Craig Skinner
To:
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,
Hi,
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Ganbold Tsagaankhuu
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> > Can anyone take a look or review new port at
>> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208913 ?
>> >
Hello,
Due to a system crash and after full fsck I found the poudriere pkg area
below ${POUDRIERE_DATA}/packages/freebsd-r292778-ports-20160501
completely damaged, esp. .latest pointed somehow into nowhere, and a
restart of 'poudriere bulk ...' wanted to start from scratch with
building
15 matches
Mail list logo