Re: suggested patch for bsd.ports.mk

2016-05-12 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Julian Elischer wrote: > > This patch is pretty self explanatory. > > it allows us to keep patches for various ports separately in a sparse > hierarchy while not having to write to the ports tree itself. Nice idea ! I'll have a look. BTW I've had something somewhat similar for maybe a decade

Recording TIMESTAMPs in distinfo for reproducible builds work

2016-05-12 Thread Ed Maste
Baptiste and I have been looking at reproducible builds in the FreeBSD ports tree, and one thing we'll need is a consistent timestamp that doesn't change when a port is rebuilt without changes. We considered a few different ideas, and have settled on experimenting with the time 'make makesum' is

Re: Why clang++37 behaves differently on 9.3 and 10.3?

2016-05-12 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 12 May 2016, at 13:33, Yuri wrote: > > clang++37 compiles this simple program fine on 10.3, but fails on 9.3. > > Why does it behave differently on different OS versions? > > It looks like it ignores -std=c++11 on 9.3. You cannot compile for C++11 on a 9.x installation,

Re: suggested patch for bsd.ports.mk

2016-05-12 Thread Chris H
On Fri, 13 May 2016 00:11:47 +0800 Julian Elischer wrote > This patch is pretty self explanatory. > > it allows us to keep patches for various ports separately in a sparse > hierarchy while not having to write to the ports tree itself. > > In case the list scrubs hte text

Re: Why clang++37 behaves differently on 9.3 and 10.3?

2016-05-12 Thread Yuri
On 05/12/2016 04:33, Yuri wrote: clang++37 compiles this simple program fine on 10.3, but fails on 9.3. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209467 Yuri ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

suggested patch for bsd.ports.mk

2016-05-12 Thread Julian Elischer
This patch is pretty self explanatory. it allows us to keep patches for various ports separately in a sparse hierarchy while not having to write to the ports tree itself. In case the list scrubs hte text attachment (diff) here's the description part of the diff. >

Why clang++37 behaves differently on 9.3 and 10.3?

2016-05-12 Thread Yuri
clang++37 compiles this simple program fine on 10.3, but fails on 9.3. Why does it behave differently on different OS versions? It looks like it ignores -std=c++11 on 9.3. Yuri ---program--- #include int main() { const int vmax = std::numeric_limits::max(); static_assert(vmax>0, ""); }