Re: Passing target to source Makefile

2016-07-21 Thread Russell Haley
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 2:55 AM, olli hauer wrote: > On 2016-07-21 08:03, Russell Haley wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> I've been able to hack up the Makefile for an update of lua53 but the >> one thing still missing is the ability to pass a target for the source >> Makefile (i.e. lua's

Anyone interested in devel/bitkeeper?

2016-07-21 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello; Upstream has cleaned up basic parts of bitkeeper for packaging so I started a port: https://people.freebsd.org/~pfg/ports/bitkeeper.tgz It basically works, I think, but is not very clean. It installs in /usr/local/bitkeeper (I said it's not very clean) and still needs some symlinking

Re: Passing target to source Makefile

2016-07-21 Thread Russell Haley
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 2:55 AM, olli hauer wrote: > On 2016-07-21 08:03, Russell Haley wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> I've been able to hack up the Makefile for an update of lua53 but the >> one thing still missing is the ability to pass a target for the source >> Makefile (i.e. lua's

Re: committer for multimedia/zoneminder

2016-07-21 Thread abi
Hello, how it's going ? :) I fixed qa warnings, so I think it could be commited. On 14.07.2016 10:57, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: Hello, can anybody commit https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210939 ? It status was changed, but assignee is not, I suspect no one is aware about

Re: Maintaining mono/.net

2016-07-21 Thread Carsten Larsen
Hi, On 09-07-2016 kl. 13:10 Romain Tartière wrote: Dear all, I finally could manage to sync my local mess into some "shipable form" and updated the bsd-sharp github repository with current WIP: https://github.com/smortex/bsd-sharp My main issue is devel/newtonsoft-json which fails to build.

Re: Passing target to source Makefile

2016-07-21 Thread Carsten Larsen
Hi Russell, > I've been able to hack up the Makefile for an update of lua53 but the one thing still missing is the ability to pass a target for the source Makefile (i.e. lua's Makefile, not the ports Makefile). I need to pass in "freebsd" as per the build instructions for lua. Assuming gnu

python34 fails to install on stable/11

2016-07-21 Thread tech-lists
Hi, $ svnlite info Path: . Working Copy Root Path: /usr/ports URL: https://svn0.eu.freebsd.org/ports/head Relative URL: ^/head Repository Root: https://svn0.eu.freebsd.org/ports Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 Revision: 418866 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last

Re: Is there still broken lang/ruby23 ?

2016-07-21 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:39:14 +0200 > "Herbert J. Skuhra" said: herbert> Any update on this issue? herbert> With this patch build works for me on FreeBSD 11.0-BETA1 amd64 herbert> (r303012). Okay, I've just committed it as r418883. Sincerely, -- Hajimu

Re: stunnel fails to build

2016-07-21 Thread tech-lists
On 21/07/2016 17:48, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > I think you should file a PR. will do, thanks for your suggestion anyway -- J. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send

Re: stunnel fails to build

2016-07-21 Thread Walter Schwarzenfeld
I think you should file a PR. The try with the Makefile was a "weak" one. I think it is the same problem as appears in other ports with libressl. e.g. (this patch is from 2014 and only an example ) "HAVE_RAND_EGD -.thing"

Is there a way to silence this warning? (Failed for virtualbox-ose...)

2016-07-21 Thread Alfred Perlstein
Hey folks, I've been getting a bunch of these warnings (see below). Would it make sense to either disable the build or mute warnings between major OS revisions for this? I believe this is due to structure size changes between 10 and 11. I tested building on a 11.x host and it's fine.

Re: stunnel fails to build

2016-07-21 Thread tech-lists
On 07/21/16 11:29, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > After reading about your issue, I updated all of my ports, via svnlite, and > successfully built on yesterday's fresh FreeBSD 10.3 Stable for i386 using > openssl. Unfortunately on the amd64, which uses libressl, I receive: > ===> stunnel-5.35,1 may

Re: stunnel fails to build

2016-07-21 Thread tech-lists
On 07/21/16 11:09, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > Try: > remove --with-ssl="${OPENSSLBASE}" > from the Makefile > and add > to USES= ssl Unfortunately, this didn't work. Here's my amended Makefile: # Created by: Martti Kuparinen # $FreeBSD:

Re: portmaster --check-port-dbdir is broken for me

2016-07-21 Thread Walter Schwarzenfeld
Thorsten, after the remove of the patch portmaster find the right files which are not installed, and nothing other. It seems is was the patch. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To

Re: portmaster --check-port-dbdir is broken for me

2016-07-21 Thread Torsten Zuehlsdorff
Hello, As it wants to literally remove all of the installed OPTIONS (xxx does not seem to be installed). What could have happened here? It went bad between 7-19 July. The system in question was offline. There was a patch included on 16 July. I could not figure out why it wants to remove

Re: portmaster --check-port-dbdir is broken for me

2016-07-21 Thread Jakub Lach
I blame recent portmaster update. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/portmaster-check-port-dbdir-is-broken-for-me-tp6115992p6116599.html Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: Is there still broken lang/ruby23 ?

2016-07-21 Thread Herbert J. Skuhra
Kurt Jaeger skrev: > > Hi! >> Kazuhiko> Is there still broken lang/ruby23[1]. Or can build in latest >> Kazuhiko> 11.0-* ? >> >> Kazuhiko> [1] >> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.devel.pkg-fallout/294364 >> >> swills> Yes, I haven't looked at it yet, but if you want to take a look,

Re: stunnel fails to build

2016-07-21 Thread Dewayne Geraghty
On 21 July 2016 at 18:15, tech-lists wrote: > Hi, > > ports: r418866 > stable/11: r302999 > > I have the following defined in /etc/make.conf - could this be the issue? > > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= ssl=libressl-devel > > ### > > build fails like this: > >

Re: stunnel fails to build

2016-07-21 Thread Walter Schwarzenfeld
Try: remove --with-ssl="${OPENSSLBASE}" from the Makefile and add to USES= ssl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Why doesn't graphics/gd build with webp?

2016-07-21 Thread Christian Ullrich
Hello all, the latest update to graphics/gd added a BROKEN flag if webp support is enabled, for reasons of "circular dependencies". I've looked through all options I can find, but there is no sign of any direct or indirect dependency of graphics/webp on graphics/gd. What's going on?

stunnel fails to build

2016-07-21 Thread tech-lists
Hi, ports: r418866 stable/11: r302999 I have the following defined in /etc/make.conf - could this be the issue? DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= ssl=libressl-devel ### build fails like this: /usr/ports/security/stunnel # make MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes ===> Building for stunnel-5.35,1 Making all in src

Passing target to source Makefile

2016-07-21 Thread Russell Haley
Hi there, I've been able to hack up the Makefile for an update of lua53 but the one thing still missing is the ability to pass a target for the source Makefile (i.e. lua's Makefile, not the ports Makefile). I need to pass in "freebsd" as per the build instructions for lua. Also, I can't seem to