Hi Mathieu & ports@
Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
> --RxP9PkeN38X7fosu2U5orM2MCGR2KKvur
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="gaRtNiWMO7FMO0KcGfOJeEdCM4BR8HecR";
> protected-headers="v1"
> From: Mathieu Arnold
> To: "Julian H. Stacey"
> C
On 05.01.2017 22:12, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
On 01/01/2017 17:28, abi wrote:
On 01.01.2017 18:28, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
I am using FreeBSD 10.3 x64. I understand that to run Windows
applications on that configuration I can use only one of the following:
1. playonbsd-4.2.10_1
2. wine-staging-
On 01/01/2017 17:28, abi wrote:
On 01.01.2017 18:28, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
I am using FreeBSD 10.3 x64. I understand that to run Windows
applications on that configuration I can use only one of the following:
1. playonbsd-4.2.10_1
2. wine-staging-2.0.r3_1,1
3. i386-wine-staging-2.0.r3_1,1
4.
Le 05/01/2017 à 15:43, Julian H. Stacey a écrit :
> This looks like a regression failure with fetch as 6.4 fetch works fine.
Do feel free to open a PR about the regression :-)
--
Mathieu Arnold
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
> --OlhIXV1DiGlq1dCEecu9IveGpJTBcCo6s
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="95npiUFepM5pQXkT1NqmlD2AdL7GsX8e5";
> protected-headers="v1"
> From: Mathieu Arnold
> To: "Julian H. Stacey" , po...@freebsd.org
> Me
Le 05/01/2017 à 14:34, Julian H. Stacey a écrit :
> ports/devel/noweb/Makefile contains
> FETCH_CMD=/usr/bin/ftp
> FETCH_ARGS= # empty
> that is wrong, because if one already has the distfile on a local site
> (accessed via MASTER_SITE_OVERRIDE or MASTER_SITE_BACKUP ),
> it hangs
ports/devel/noweb/Makefile contains
FETCH_CMD=/usr/bin/ftp
FETCH_ARGS= # empty
that is wrong, because if one already has the distfile on a local site
(accessed via MASTER_SITE_OVERRIDE or MASTER_SITE_BACKUP ),
it hangs & fails on make fetch.
The patch below works for me, but
On 2017-01-04 23:59, Ben Woods wrote:
A thought: should the wiki namespace follow the ports namespace, to
avoid any ambiguity?
Good advice, and it's a better way to organize them, yes. I did the
changes, but there's now another problem and that's we can't have 1:1
mapping between wiki page an
On 05/01/2017 11:56, Franco Fichtner wrote:
On 5 Jan 2017, at 11:44 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 5/01/2017 6:30 PM, Jan Bramkamp wrote:
On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install both samba44
and libreoffice using the offici
On 05/01/2017 12:04, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 01/05/17 10:43, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
[openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client and libreoffice etc]
Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and set
the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With binary
package
On 01/05/17 10:43, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
[openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client and libreoffice etc]
Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and set
the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With binary
packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems I f
On 05/01/2017 11:43, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
[openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client and libreoffice etc]
Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and set
the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With binary
packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems I
> On 5 Jan 2017, at 11:44 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> On 5/01/2017 6:30 PM, Jan Bramkamp wrote:
>> On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install both
>>> samba44
>>> and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repo
On 5/01/2017 6:30 PM, Jan Bramkamp wrote:
On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install
both samba44
and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository?
Or samba44 and KDE?
If yes, then that sucks...
similar happened
Hi!
[openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client and libreoffice etc]
> Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and set
> the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With binary
> packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems I for one no longer see
> removing
Good day,
Welcome to our Private Placement Portfolio.
I am a Staff of a Venture Capital Firm specializing in Growth Capital
Investments/Loans.We seek to invest in Projects with Public and Private sectors
in a broad range of areas including Real estate, Agriculture, Energy, Oil and
Gas, emergin
On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install both samba44
and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository?
Or samba44 and KDE?
If yes, then that sucks...
Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
18 matches
Mail list logo
