iPad Air 2

2017-03-13 Thread mostafa shahdadi
Sent from my iPad ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Team 22 Holiday Card

2017-03-13 Thread Edward Munoz
yoo On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Edgar Lin wrote: > Team 22, > > 8th graders in our Tech Arts program have been hard at work designing our > Team 22 Holiday Card. 4 designs are up for votes to become the official > Team 22 Holiday Card for 2016-17. > > Cast your

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

2017-03-13 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 09:32:13 -0600 Adam Weinberger wrote: > On 13 Mar, 2017, at 7:32, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:25:13 -0700 Adam Weinberger >> wrote: On 11 Mar, 2017, at 12:53, Adam Weinberger

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

2017-03-13 Thread Adam Weinberger
> On 13 Mar, 2017, at 7:32, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > > On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:25:13 -0700 Adam Weinberger > wrote: >>> On 11 Mar, 2017, at 12:53, Adam Weinberger wrote: On 11 Mar, 2017, at 12:29, Tijl Coosemans wrote:

Re: Firefox port issue

2017-03-13 Thread The Doctor
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:35:45AM +, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 2017/03/13 04:27, The Doctor wrote: > > back to the question: Why is python still choking > > > > even after a port reinstall? > > > > Did you change the default version of python in your make.conf recently? > Is it possible

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

2017-03-13 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:25:13 -0700 Adam Weinberger wrote: >> On 11 Mar, 2017, at 12:53, Adam Weinberger wrote: >>> On 11 Mar, 2017, at 12:29, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:18:18 -0700 Adam Weinberger >>>

Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

2017-03-13 Thread Mathieu Arnold
Le 11/03/2017 à 19:32, Eitan Adler a écrit : > On 11 March 2017 at 09:13, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:51 + (UTC) jbe...@freebsd.org (Jan Beich) >> wrote: >>> Tijl Coosemans writes: On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET)

Re: opendmarc - Massive dependancy list going from 1.3.1 to 1.3.1_4?

2017-03-13 Thread Karl Pielorz
--On 13 March 2017 13:37 +0100 Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: Aloha, Yes: by checking the changelog. I had a fast look at it and found the following entry from February: === start === (1) Add USES perl5 and add RUN_DEPENDS for perl modules needed by the

Re: opendmarc - Massive dependancy list going from 1.3.1 to 1.3.1_4?

2017-03-13 Thread Torsten Zuehlsdorff
Aloha, I have two 10.3 systems - I installed opendmarc on the first, a while ago - 'make all-depends-list' shows a small list of dependencies: /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg /usr/ports/mail/libspf2 On the other machine after portsnap fetch/extract it looks like I'm going to get '1.3.1_4' - but a

Re: sc-im marked broken on aarch64

2017-03-13 Thread Iku
> fwiw, my goal in marking ports BROKEN on the various tier-2 archs is to > bring more attention to them. We still have a lot of work to do on the > arm archs in particular to bring things up to parity with amd64 (well, > as much as we can, in any case.) All help is welcome! I might take a

Re: sc-im marked broken on aarch64

2017-03-13 Thread Mark Linimon
I've committed the fix. Thanks for reporting and testing. fwiw, my goal in marking ports BROKEN on the various tier-2 archs is to bring more attention to them. We still have a lot of work to do on the arm archs in particular to bring things up to parity with amd64 (well, as much as we can, in

opendmarc - Massive dependancy list going from 1.3.1 to 1.3.1_4?

2017-03-13 Thread Karl Pielorz
Hi, I have two 10.3 systems - I installed opendmarc on the first, a while ago - 'make all-depends-list' shows a small list of dependencies: /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg /usr/ports/mail/libspf2 On the other machine after portsnap fetch/extract it looks like I'm going to get '1.3.1_4' - but a

Re: Firefox port issue

2017-03-13 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 2017/03/13 04:27, The Doctor wrote: > back to the question: Why is python still choking > > even after a port reinstall? > Did you change the default version of python in your make.conf recently? Is it possible you have a mixture packages of (or depending on) different versions of python?

Re: Firefox port issue

2017-03-13 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 2017/03/13 01:17, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > I don't believe this causss the error, but your syntax is deprecated, use: > > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=linux=c7_64 ruby=ruby?.2 python=2.7 ssl=openss bdb=6l > > in one line. This makes exactly zero difference. If the OP wants to build a

Re: sc-im marked broken on aarch64

2017-03-13 Thread Iku
Hi, > 0.4.0 was busted on aarch64 and armv6[1] but 0.5.0 builds fine[2]. That explains it as some compatibility work was done there. Is it up to the maintainer/someone with commit access now to update the port? Cheers ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

Re: sc-im marked broken on aarch64

2017-03-13 Thread Jan Beich
Sijmen Mulder writes: > Hi all, > > sc-im was recently marked as BROKEN_aarch64: > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/math/sc-im/Makefile?r1=434438=434754=434754 0.4.0 was busted on aarch64 and armv6[1] but 0.5.0 builds fine[2]. [1]

Re: sc-im marked broken on aarch64

2017-03-13 Thread Mark Linimon
If I marked it, it was as a result of it failing on FreeBSD's build cluster. I don't have hardware set up here yet myself. I'd go ahead and commit the fix but I have other distractions this week. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

sc-im marked broken on aarch64

2017-03-13 Thread Sijmen Mulder
Hi all, sc-im was recently marked as BROKEN_aarch64: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/math/sc-im/Makefile?r1=434438=434754=434754 I'm an occasional contributor to this project and a FreeBSD user so I thought I'd have a stab at it. Unfortunately, I couldn't reproduce the issue. Since I