Sent from my iPad
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
yoo
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Edgar Lin
wrote:
> Team 22,
>
> 8th graders in our Tech Arts program have been hard at work designing our
> Team 22 Holiday Card. 4 designs are up for votes to become the official
> Team 22 Holiday Card for 2016-17.
>
> Cast your
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 09:32:13 -0600 Adam Weinberger wrote:
> On 13 Mar, 2017, at 7:32, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:25:13 -0700 Adam Weinberger
>> wrote:
On 11 Mar, 2017, at 12:53, Adam Weinberger
> On 13 Mar, 2017, at 7:32, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:25:13 -0700 Adam Weinberger
> wrote:
>>> On 11 Mar, 2017, at 12:53, Adam Weinberger wrote:
On 11 Mar, 2017, at 12:29, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:35:45AM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 2017/03/13 04:27, The Doctor wrote:
> > back to the question: Why is python still choking
> >
> > even after a port reinstall?
> >
>
> Did you change the default version of python in your make.conf recently?
> Is it possible
On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:25:13 -0700 Adam Weinberger
wrote:
>> On 11 Mar, 2017, at 12:53, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>>> On 11 Mar, 2017, at 12:29, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:18:18 -0700 Adam Weinberger
>>>
Le 11/03/2017 à 19:32, Eitan Adler a écrit :
> On 11 March 2017 at 09:13, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:51 + (UTC) jbe...@freebsd.org (Jan Beich)
>> wrote:
>>> Tijl Coosemans writes:
On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET)
--On 13 March 2017 13:37 +0100 Torsten Zuehlsdorff
wrote:
Aloha,
Yes: by checking the changelog. I had a fast look at it and found the
following entry from February:
=== start ===
(1) Add USES perl5 and add RUN_DEPENDS for perl modules needed by the
Aloha,
I have two 10.3 systems - I installed opendmarc on the first, a while
ago - 'make all-depends-list' shows a small list of dependencies:
/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg
/usr/ports/mail/libspf2
On the other machine after portsnap fetch/extract it looks like I'm
going to get '1.3.1_4' - but a
> fwiw, my goal in marking ports BROKEN on the various tier-2 archs is to
> bring more attention to them. We still have a lot of work to do on the
> arm archs in particular to bring things up to parity with amd64 (well,
> as much as we can, in any case.) All help is welcome!
I might take a
I've committed the fix. Thanks for reporting and testing.
fwiw, my goal in marking ports BROKEN on the various tier-2 archs is to
bring more attention to them. We still have a lot of work to do on the
arm archs in particular to bring things up to parity with amd64 (well,
as much as we can, in
Hi,
I have two 10.3 systems - I installed opendmarc on the first, a while ago -
'make all-depends-list' shows a small list of dependencies:
/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg
/usr/ports/mail/libspf2
On the other machine after portsnap fetch/extract it looks like I'm going
to get '1.3.1_4' - but a
On 2017/03/13 04:27, The Doctor wrote:
> back to the question: Why is python still choking
>
> even after a port reinstall?
>
Did you change the default version of python in your make.conf recently?
Is it possible you have a mixture packages of (or depending on)
different versions of python?
On 2017/03/13 01:17, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote:
> I don't believe this causss the error, but your syntax is deprecated, use:
>
> DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=linux=c7_64 ruby=ruby?.2 python=2.7 ssl=openss bdb=6l
>
> in one line.
This makes exactly zero difference. If the OP wants to build a
Hi,
> 0.4.0 was busted on aarch64 and armv6[1] but 0.5.0 builds fine[2].
That explains it as some compatibility work was done there. Is it up to
the maintainer/someone with commit access now to update the port?
Cheers
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Sijmen Mulder writes:
> Hi all,
>
> sc-im was recently marked as BROKEN_aarch64:
>
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/math/sc-im/Makefile?r1=434438=434754=434754
0.4.0 was busted on aarch64 and armv6[1] but 0.5.0 builds fine[2].
[1]
If I marked it, it was as a result of it failing on FreeBSD's build cluster.
I don't have hardware set up here yet myself.
I'd go ahead and commit the fix but I have other distractions this week.
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi all,
sc-im was recently marked as BROKEN_aarch64:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/math/sc-im/Makefile?r1=434438=434754=434754
I'm an occasional contributor to this project and a FreeBSD user so I
thought I'd have a stab at it. Unfortunately, I couldn't reproduce the
issue.
Since I
18 matches
Mail list logo