x11-toolkits/qt5-gui vs. arm.armv6 build via poudriere cross build: fails (undefined references) and odd mix of "clang++" vs. "/nxb-bin/usr/bin/c++"

This is a bit odd so I give it in stages. The context is based on: poudriere jail -c -j zrFBSDx64CjailArmV7 -a arm.armv6 -x -m null -M /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/clang-armv7-installworld-poud -S /usr/src -v 12.0-CURRENT poudriere bulk -j zrFBSDx64CjailArmV7 -w -f /root/armv7-origins.txt (More details

Re: PR looking for committer

On Tuesday, 5 September 2017 at 15:56:12 +0200, Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > Hi, > > Can a committer have a look at this? It blocks another port update > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222001 Probably. In fact, you've probably caused several committers to look at it, but

Re: x11/pixman vs. clang 5 arm assembler handling: "error: unknown directive" and the like

On 2017-Sep-5, at 1:33 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2017-Sep-5, at 1:13 PM, Jan Beich wrote: > >> Mark Millard writes: >> >>> In an experiment with building some arm ports via poudriere >>> cross building on amd64 I got the following. It appears that >>> clang does not

Re: Tcl/Tk 8.4 deprecation

> On 5 Sep 2017, at 22:01, Kevin Oberman wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:03 AM, Pietro Cerutti wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'll be shorty deprecating Tcl/Tk 8.4 in our ports tree. The latest >> release of this series was 8.4.20 (June 2013). >>

Re: x11/pixman vs. clang 5 arm assembler handling: "error: unknown directive" and the like

On 2017-Sep-5, at 1:13 PM, Jan Beich wrote: > Mark Millard writes: > >> In an experiment with building some arm ports via poudriere >> cross building on amd64 I got the following. It appears that >> clang does not handle all the assembler notation and a >> different assembler might need to be

Re: x11/pixman vs. clang 5 arm assembler handling: "error: unknown directive" and the like

Mark Millard writes: > In an experiment with building some arm ports via poudriere > cross building on amd64 I got the following. It appears that > clang does not handle all the assembler notation and a > different assembler might need to be used for x11/pixman . > (The

Re: Tcl/Tk 8.4 deprecation

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:03 AM, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > Hi all, > > I'll be shorty deprecating Tcl/Tk 8.4 in our ports tree. The latest > release of this series was 8.4.20 (June 2013). > Tcl/Tk series 8.5 and 8.6 are fully supported, and 8.7 is coming > soon-ish. > > Thus, I

x11/pixman vs. clang 5 arm assembler handling: "error: unknown directive" and the like

In an experiment with building some arm ports via poudriere cross building on amd64 I got the following. It appears that clang does not handle all the assembler notation and a different assembler might need to be used for x11/pixman . (The x11/pixman usage is indirect from having specified

Re: Help Wanted - Work with MSFT and help finish the port of .NET Core to FreeBSD

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:52 AM, David Naylor wrote: > On Monday, 4 September 2017 10:54:21 Geoffrey Huntley wrote: >> See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHllisWOCpU and >> https://twitter.com/GeoffreyHuntley/status/904227946084294656 > > Hi Geoffrey > > It is great to

Re: Help Wanted - Work with MSFT and help finish the port of .NET Core to FreeBSD

On Monday, 4 September 2017 10:54:21 Geoffrey Huntley wrote: > See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHllisWOCpU and > https://twitter.com/GeoffreyHuntley/status/904227946084294656 Hi Geoffrey It is great to hear there is more interest in finishing the port of .NET Core to FreeBSD (and, I hope,

Re: USES pgsql:plpython?

Yes sorry. I wrote too fast :) My patch is near to be ready. Just some tests to be sure. Thanks. Envoyé de mon smartphone BlackBerry 10.   Message d'origine   De: Chris Rees Envoyé: mardi 5 septembre 2017 20:44 À: L.Bartoletti; po...@freebsd.org Cc: pg...@freebsd.org Objet: Re: USES

Re: USES pgsql:plpython?

By the way, the syntax is: USES= pgsql WANT_PGSQL= plpython The argument to USES is for version selection. Chris On 5 September 2017 19:33:53 BST, Chris Rees wrote: >Hey, > >No reason at all... I just missed it out when I wrote that bit of >pgsql.mk :) >

Re: USES pgsql:plpython?

Hey, No reason at all... I just missed it out when I wrote that bit of pgsql.mk :) If you feel up to patching Mk/Uses/pgsql.mk (have a look at line 135, add plpython and make another line below it to match the others). Please alphabetise the list while you're at it! If you can't get it to

USES pgsql:plpython?

Hi, I prepare a port which needs plpython. Is there any reason that we don't have the choice to write in our Makefile "USES pgsql:plpython"? Only because there are no ports dependent upon this port? Can I add it to my diff? Regards Loïc Bartoletti.

Re: Tcl/Tk 8.4 deprecation

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:03 AM, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > Hi all, > > I'll be shorty deprecating Tcl/Tk 8.4 in our ports tree. The latest > release of this series was 8.4.20 (June 2013). > Tcl/Tk series 8.5 and 8.6 are fully supported, and 8.7 is coming > soon-ish. > > Thus, I

Tele-communication Mailing List

Hi, Good Day I'm writing to check if you would be interested to acquire the newly released 200,000+ "Tele-communication Executive" Leads with verified business emails and complete contact information. Data Fields: Contact name, Title, Company name, Size, Any Location, Opt-In Email

PR looking for committer

Hi, Can a committer have a look at this? It blocks another port update https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222001 Thanks! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe,

Re: Poudreiere auto-track quarterly ports?

Le 05/09/2017 à 03:50, Dan Mahoney a écrit : > Hey there All, > > Is there an easy way to have poudriere auto-track the latest quarterly > ports build tree, without having to manually reset it to a specific > branch? > > Poudriere knows how to portsnap the latest ports/head, but not the latest

Tcl/Tk 8.4 deprecation

Hi all, I'll be shorty deprecating Tcl/Tk 8.4 in our ports tree. The latest release of this series was 8.4.20 (June 2013). Tcl/Tk series 8.5 and 8.6 are fully supported, and 8.7 is coming soon-ish. Thus, I will soon mark the following ports as DEPRECATED, with expiry date sometimes this fall. If

Re: Poudreiere auto-track quarterly ports?

On 09/04/17 21:50, Dan Mahoney wrote: Hey there All, Is there an easy way to have poudriere auto-track the latest quarterly ports build tree, without having to manually reset it to a specific branch? Poudriere knows how to portsnap the latest ports/head, but not the latest quarterly.

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

Re: Poudreiere auto-track quarterly ports?

Hi On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 01:50:06AM +, Dan Mahoney wrote: > Is there an easy way to have poudriere auto-track the latest quarterly > ports build tree, without having to manually reset it to a specific > branch? > > Poudriere knows how to portsnap the latest ports/head, but not the latest