Please upgrade ports-mgmt/synth to 2.00

Hi Eric, Please update ports-mgmt/synth to 2.00, which was just recently tagged. This will bring in Flavors support. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: firefox-esr on armv6/7

Hi Mikael, Your patch seems to have applied, but I've run into a spot of trouble. I forgot to apply the patch before starting make, so I killed it with control-c, applied the patch and tried to restart. The attempt failed, some sort of error in /tmp/mountpoint... I've tried various

Re: building blender 2.79 fails because of python dependencies

I do not have anything related to python in my make.conf only ccache. WITH_CCACHE_BUILD=yes .if (!empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/src*) || !empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/obj*)) .if !defined(NOCCACHE) && exists(/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc) CC:=${CC:C,^cc,/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc,1}

Re: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

Rozhuk Ivan rozhuk.im at gmail.com wrote on Sat Dec 2 18:18:39 UTC 2017 : > I dont want poudriere because I dont need ZFS, jails and other crap on my > system. > I dont want to play system administrator: keep and admin build servers at > home/work. > > I just want update from source all my

Re: Central build runs out of file descriptors on devel/RStudio

> On 2 Dec, 2017, at 18:57, Yuri wrote: > > Build opens too many file descriptors, and fails: > > http://beefy5.nyi.freebsd.org/data/103i386-default/455387/logs/RStudio-1.1.385.log > > http://beefy6.nyi.freebsd.org/data/103amd64-default/455387/logs/RStudio-1.1.385.log > > >

Central build runs out of file descriptors on devel/RStudio

Build opens too many file descriptors, and fails: http://beefy5.nyi.freebsd.org/data/103i386-default/455387/logs/RStudio-1.1.385.log http://beefy6.nyi.freebsd.org/data/103amd64-default/455387/logs/RStudio-1.1.385.log It looks like kern.maxfiles on beefy needs to be beefed up. Yuri

Re: building blender 2.79 fails because of python dependencies

On 30/11/2017 21:05, blubee blubeeme wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 9:25 PM, blubee blubeeme > wrote: > >> Here's a build log: >> >> running install_scripts ... >> ===> blender-2.79_2 depends on shared library: libOpenColorIO.so - not >> found >> ===>

Re: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

> On 2 Dec, 2017, at 13:41, Baho Utot wrote: > > > On 12/2/2017 1:43 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 11:53:58AM +, Carmel NY wrote: >>> Looking back at other port management utilities like "portmanager", >>> "portmaster", "portupgrade" and now

Re: poudriere, python ports, and flavors oh my?

> On 2 Dec, 2017, at 5:55, Christian Ullrich wrote: > > * Henrik Hudson wrote: > >> So, I must be missing something. I have a poudriere jail specific >> make.conf like this: > >> #Python >> DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= python=3.6 python2=2.7 python3=3.6 > > Same here, and this

Re: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On 12/2/2017 1:43 PM, Mark Linimon wrote: On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 11:53:58AM +, Carmel NY wrote: Looking back at other port management utilities like "portmanager", "portmaster", "portupgrade" and now "synth", The FreeBSD team has done a pretty good job of obfuscating and rendering them

Re: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 11:53:58AM +, Carmel NY wrote: > Looking back at other port management utilities like "portmanager", > "portmaster", "portupgrade" and now "synth", The FreeBSD team has > done a pretty good job of obfuscating and rendering them impotent. That's one possible

Re: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 09:58:15 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote: > I have a laptop with 664 installed packages. It has 6.4 GB > of free diskspace and 3.5 GB of available memory. It is the > only i686 system that I have and it is used to develop and > test all of the

Re: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 01:04:12PM +0100, Vlad K. wrote: > On 2017-12-02 12:53, Carmel NY wrote: > > > > I am hoping that someone can get "synth" back up and working > > correctly. If not > > it might be time for me to look at another OS for my network. > > > This has been mentioned several

Re: Last flavorless revision?

On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 02:06:32PM +0100, Christian Ullrich wrote: > * Steve Kargl wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 01:42:27PM -0700, Adam Weinberger wrote: > >>> On 1 Dec, 2017, at 13:07, Steve Kargl > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> ports/UPDATING does not seem

RE: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On Saturday, December 2, 2017 8:01 AM, Baho Utot stated: > On 12/02/17 07:23, Charlie Li wrote: > > On 02/12/2017 06:53, Carmel NY wrote: > >> Well, I certainly have no intention of installing and then learning > >> how to use an industrial sized solution line poudriere for a relatively > >>

Re: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On 12/02/17 07:23, Charlie Li wrote: On 02/12/2017 06:53, Carmel NY wrote: Well, I certainly have no intention of installing and then learning how to use an industrial sized solution line poudriere for a relatively small home network. poudriere is not industrial-sized at all. Sure, it has

Re: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On 12/02/17 07:04, Vlad K. wrote: On 2017-12-02 12:53, Carmel NY wrote: I am hoping that  someone can get "synth" back up and working correctly. If not it might be time for me to look at another OS for my network. This has been mentioned several times as a "solution", but I really

Re: Last flavorless revision?

* Steve Kargl wrote: On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 01:42:27PM -0700, Adam Weinberger wrote: On 1 Dec, 2017, at 13:07, Steve Kargl wrote: ports/UPDATING does not seem to include an entry noting the last subversion revision prior to the flipping on flavors. Is

Re: poudriere, python ports, and flavors oh my?

* Henrik Hudson wrote: So, I must be missing something. I have a poudriere jail specific make.conf like this: #Python DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= python=3.6 python2=2.7 python3=3.6 Same here, and this happens: # cat /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/py3-make.conf DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= python=3.6 #

Re: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On 02/12/2017 06:53, Carmel NY wrote: > Well, I certainly have no intention of installing and then learning how to use > an industrial sized solution line poudriere for a relatively small home > network. > poudriere is not industrial-sized at all. Sure, it has many features that I don't exactly

Re: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 09:59:33AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > First, welcome flavors. It has been badly needed for a while and is going > to clean up a couple of messes that have been plaguing the port system for > a long time. > > Second, whither port msanagement tools? At least portmaster

Re: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On 2017-12-02 12:53, Carmel NY wrote: I am hoping that someone can get "synth" back up and working correctly. If not it might be time for me to look at another OS for my network. This has been mentioned several times as a "solution", but I really don't understand it. What other OS would

RE: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On Saturday, December 2, 2017 5:40 AM, Stari Karp stated: > On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 01:12 +, Ben Woods wrote: > > Hi Carmel, > > > > My understanding is that poudriere is the only package building system > > that is officially supported by the portmgr, apart from raw make. > > > > There are many

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

Re: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 01:12 +, Ben Woods wrote: > On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 at 2:36 am, Carmel NY > wrote: > > > > > > -- > > Carmel > > > Hi Carmel, > > My understanding is that poudriere is the only package building > system that > is officially supported by the