conflicts with packages on install

2018-07-02 Thread blubee blubeeme
I'm working on updating a port it currently installs in a ${PREFIX}/${PORTNAME}/bin and I'd like to create symlinks t ${PREFIX}/bin The issue i'm running into is that there's a binary file "terrain" this conflicts with graphics/mesa-demos/terrain. I'm looking for options on resolving this conflic

Re: What the port license should be when software is "free for non-commercial use" with "click-to-accept" or clickwrap license?

2018-07-02 Thread Eugene Grosbein
03.07.2018 6:17, Yuri wrote: >> It does. See mail/dcc-dccd for example. > But it doesn't ask to "agree" during 'pkg install dcc-dccd'. Yes. Meantime, you have several choices: 1) Mark the port NO_PACKAGE and/or no-pkg-mirror to force users use a port that 1a) builds software from source, or 1b)

Re: What the port license should be when software is "free for non-commercial use" with "click-to-accept" or clickwrap license?

2018-07-02 Thread Yuri
On 07/02/18 16:11, Eugene Grosbein wrote: It does. See mail/dcc-dccd for example. But it doesn't ask to "agree" during 'pkg install dcc-dccd'. Yuri ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-port

Re: What the port license should be when software is "free for non-commercial use" with "click-to-accept" or clickwrap license?

2018-07-02 Thread Eugene Grosbein
03.07.2018 5:52, Yuri wrote: > One software package has the custom license text that users need to > click-to-accept in order to install it. > > Does 'pkg' support such license? Can it show the user the license text and > ask the user to click "Agree" before installing the package? It does. Se

What the port license should be when software is "free for non-commercial use" with "click-to-accept" or clickwrap license?

2018-07-02 Thread Yuri
One software package has the custom license text that users need to click-to-accept in order to install it. Does 'pkg' support such license? Can it show the user the license text and ask the user to click "Agree" before installing the package? If not, I think this is a good feature to have.

Re: Any way to prevent do-extract chmod and chown?

2018-07-02 Thread Chris H
On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 00:05:59 +0200 "Mathieu Arnold" said On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 01:43:41PM -0400, Joseph Ward wrote: > Thank you.  I found that to be the case; even though changing the > "do-extract" target successfully staged the files and directories with > the original permissions, pkg crea

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2018-07-02 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

New 2018Q3 branch

2018-07-02 Thread Mathieu Arnold
Hi, The 2018Q3 branch has been created. It means that the next update on the quarterly packages will be on the 2018Q3 branch. A lot of things happened in the last three months: - pkg 1.10.5_1 - Firefox 61.0 - Firefox-esr 60.1.0 - Chromium 65.0.3325.181 - Ruby 2.4.3 -> 2.4.4 - Qt4 4.8.7 - Qt5 5.10