[A native poudreire-devel based build of
multimedia/gstreamer1-qt@qt5 did not hang-up
and worked fine. Official package build history
also provides some evidence.]
On 2018-Dec-22, at 12:55, Mark Millard wrote:
> [I found my E-mail records reporting successful builds using
> qemu-user-static
On Monday, 24 December 2018 18:14:51 CET Michael Butler wrote:
> As follows:
.. and here I had tested on 11.2 with base SSL, openssl, openssl111, .. and
not considered that 12.0 would remove the definition of IFM_FDDI entirely.
Fixed, I hope, in r488281 (which built for me in a 12.0-RC3 VM).
As follows:
--- .obj/qudpsocket.o ---
c++ -c -O2 -pipe -march=ivybridge -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing
-DOPENSSL_API_COMPAT=0x1010L -std=c++1z -fvisibility=hidden
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden -fno-exceptions -Wall -W -Wdate-time
-Winconsistent-missing-override -pthread -fPIC
On Mon 2018-12-24 11:06:56 UTC+0100, Walter Schwarzenfeld
(w.schwarzenf...@utanet.at) wrote:
> The qt* ports spreads around in the whole portstree.
>
> It is reasonable to concentrate all these ports in a qt category? I think it
> is easier to find (and also easier to maintain).
Why?
You'd
On Monday, 24 December 2018 13:00:02 CET freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org
wrote:
> > The qt* ports spreads around in the whole portstree.
> >
> > It is reasonable to concentrate all these ports in a qt category? I
> > think it is easier to find (and also easier to maintain).
>
> Indeed it is a
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 11:06:56AM +0100, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote:
> The qt* ports spreads around in the whole portstree.
>
> It is reasonable to concentrate all these ports in a qt category? I think it
> is easier to find (and also easier to maintain).
While a virtual category could easily
On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 15:50:23 +0300
wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 19:01:15 -0500
> wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I try to install libreoffice and it pulls also
> > texlive-texmf which size is about 2 GB and I have a slow
> > Internet. After was done, please read bellow.
> >
> > => Fetching all
On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 19:01:15 -0500
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I try to install libreoffice and it pulls also
> texlive-texmf which size is about 2 GB and I have a slow
> Internet. After was done, please read bellow.
>
> => Fetching all distfiles required by
> texlive-texmf-20150523_4 for building ===>
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,
> The qt* ports spreads around in the whole portstree.
>
> It is reasonable to concentrate all these ports in a qt category? I
> think it is easier to find (and also easier to maintain).
Indeed it is a bit annoying for me when I have to update qt* ports.
I don't use portmaster or similar (I don't
The qt* ports spreads around in the whole portstree.
It is reasonable to concentrate all these ports in a qt category? I
think it is easier to find (and also easier to maintain).
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
11 matches
Mail list logo
