Re: FreeBSD Port: fetchmail-6.3.26_9

2019-01-06 Thread Oleg V. Nauman
On Sunday, January 6, 2019 9:58:29 PM EET Alex V. Petrov wrote: > New depence? > > checking for Kerberos V in /usr/local... found > checking for krb5_des_string_to_key in -lcrypto... no > checking for krb5_des_string_to_key in -lk5crypto... no > configure: error: Kerberos 5 DES libraries not

Re: FreeBSD Port: fetchmail-6.3.26_9

2019-01-06 Thread Alex V. Petrov
I have openssl from ports and 12.0-STABLE 07.01.2019 05:01, Corey Halpin пишет: > When I build with the options you've shown on 11.2/amd64 using OpenSSL > from base, I don't see the failure you're reporting. > > Instead, my configure output shows: > > checking for Kerberos V in /usr/local...

Re: FreeBSD Port: fetchmail-6.3.26_9

2019-01-06 Thread Alex V. Petrov
make -C mail/fetchmail showconfig ===> The following configuration options are available for fetchmail-6.3.26_9: DOCS=on: Build and/or install documentation NLS=on: Native Language Support NTLM=off: NTLM authentication support POP2=off: POP2 Protocol support[obsolete]

FreeBSD Port: fetchmail-6.3.26_9

2019-01-06 Thread Alex V. Petrov
New depence? checking for Kerberos V in /usr/local... found checking for krb5_des_string_to_key in -lcrypto... no checking for krb5_des_string_to_key in -lk5crypto... no configure: error: Kerberos 5 DES libraries not found gmake[2]: *** [Makefile:622: config.status] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving

Re: Request for help: remove bundler from ruby 2.6 port

2019-01-06 Thread Yasuhiro KIMURA
From: Yasuhiro KIMURA Subject: Re: Request for help: remove bundler from ruby 2.6 port Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 10:35:14 +0900 (JST) > Thank you for reply. Then I'm going to create full port and post here > again. Created. https://www.utahime.org/FreeBSD/ports/lang_ruby26.20190105.patch Please

qemu-arm-static has target_freebsd11_nstat too small vs. arm native's struct nstat

2019-01-06 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
[The context here is FreeBSD head -r341836 based and ports head -r488859 based.] Note: I assume that "struct target_shmd_ds" is meant to match the memory layout of the target's native "struct shmid_ds". Otherwise the reported differences below could be irrelevant. For armv7 (and likely armv6)