On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 13:22:25 +0200
Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> [...]
> > Would it not be better to have, say, the last two versions before
> > current stable still in ports but with a huge disclaimer saying:
> > use at your own risk, etc.?
> >
> > What do y'all think?
>
> You make the case
Hi Adam,
> Am 12.08.2019 um 15:29 schrieb Adam Weinberger :
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 1:04 AM Martin Waschbüsch
> wrote:
>> Furthermore, the argument that it is more more work to maintain an
>> abandoned version is silly because it’s more work to delete a port that
>> to just
> On 12. Aug 2019, at 16:29, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 1:04 AM Martin Waschbüsch
> wrote:
>> Furthermore, the argument that it is more more work to maintain an
>> abandoned version is silly because it’s more work to delete a port that
>> to just keep it
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 1:04 AM Martin Waschbüsch wrote:
> Furthermore, the argument that it is more more work to maintain an
> abandoned version is silly because it’s more work to delete a port that
> to just keep it in the tree for a while longer.
> >>>
> >>> That last part
Franco Fichtner wrote on 2019/08/12 08:20:
That „while“ is debatable, but it’s neither indefinitely nor immediately. The
people responsible for FreeBSD ports and packages would be wise to enrich their
policies with a more graceful way of dealing with legacy software, especially
if it relates
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
fixed with
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision=508709
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi Adam,
> Am 12.08.2019 um 02:17 schrieb Adam Weinberger :
>
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 5:50 PM Martin Waschbüsch
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Adam,
>>
>>> Am 11.08.2019 um 23:22 schrieb Adam Weinberger :
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 1:05 PM Franco Fichtner
>>> wrote:
Quarterly is
I had no crashes, but slowdown.
Put in about:config:
browser.tabs.remote.force-enable=true
net.local.stream.recvspace=16384
maybe, this helps.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
* Kevin Oberman [190812 01:50]:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 4:23 PM Martin Waschbüsch
> wrote:
>>> Am 11.08.2019 um 23:31 schrieb Wolfgang Zenker :
>>> * Martin Waschbüsch [190811 20:41]:
[..]
> You could also have used the quarterly branch, which keeps software till
> the end of the
Breaks also portmaster.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> On 12. Aug 2019, at 00:22, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 1:05 PM Franco Fichtner wrote:
>>
>> Quarterly is essentially useless if the decision is to immediately axe a
>> deprecated release. 3 months are nothing in production environments, if you
>> get 3 months (1,5
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-11 - please wait..--- describe.accessibility ---
--- describe.arabic ---
--- describe.archivers ---
--- describe.astro ---
--- describe.audio ---
--- describe.benchmarks ---
--- describe.biology ---
--- describe.cad ---
--- describe.chinese ---
---
13 matches
Mail list logo
