* Dave Horsfall [191009 02:58]:
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019, Wolfgang Zenker wrote:
>> So, you don't *need* IPv6. But you might *want* to have it anyway.
> In my 40+ years career I've only encountered one (1) client that ran IPv6
> internally (oddly enough, a law firm) and that was by management
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019, Wolfgang Zenker wrote:
So, you don't *need* IPv6. But you might *want* to have it anyway.
In my 40+ years career I've only encountered one (1) client that ran IPv6
internally (oddly enough, a law firm) and that was by management decree,
not the tehchies' (come to think
Hi,
* abi via freebsd-ports [191008 21:16]:
> 07.10.2019 09:18, Yasuhiro KIMURA пишет:
>> On October 10, 2012 IPV6 option of all ports was enabled by
>> default. Commit message said "We are in 2012, it is time to activate
>> IPV6 options by default everywhere".
>> And now we are in 2019. IPv6
07.10.2019 09:18, Yasuhiro KIMURA пишет:
On October 10, 2012 IPV6 option of all ports was enabled by
default. Commit message said "We are in 2012, it is time to activate
IPV6 options by default everywhere".
And now we are in 2019. IPv6 is more widely used than 2012. So I
wonder if IPV6 option
