Re: lsof marked ignored

2020-03-20 Thread Eugene Grosbein
21.03.2020 4:30, @lbutlr wrote: > On 20 Mar 2020, at 14:10, Robert Huff wrote: >> Adam Weinberger writes: >> ===>>> Currently installed version: lsof-4.93.2_9,8 ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/lsof ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE ===>>>

Re: lsof marked ignored

2020-03-20 Thread Larry Rosenman
On 03/20/2020 9:09 pm, Robert Huff wrote: Larry Rosenman writes: I'd love to see the kernel folks make better interfaces. I've been saying that for 2 years. Can you be one step more specific on what interface it needs? Respectfully,

Re: lsof marked ignored

2020-03-20 Thread Robert Huff
Larry Rosenman writes: > I'd love to see the kernel folks make better interfaces. > > I've been saying that for 2 years. Can you be one step more specific on what interface it needs? Respectfully, Robert Huff

Re: users of xorg, in particular on FreeBSD 11.3

2020-03-20 Thread Eugene Grosbein
21.03.2020 6:41, Niclas Zeising wrote: > [ This is cross-posted across several mailing lists for maximum visibility. > Please respect reply-to and keep replies to x...@freebsd.org . Thank you! ] > > In order to improve support when using evdev to manage input devices, in > particular

users of xorg, in particular on FreeBSD 11.3

2020-03-20 Thread Niclas Zeising
[ This is cross-posted across several mailing lists for maximum visibility. Please respect reply-to and keep replies to x...@freebsd.org . Thank you! ] In order to improve support when using evdev to manage input devices, in particular keyboards, we have switched the default in

Re: lsof marked ignored

2020-03-20 Thread Larry Rosenman
On 03/20/2020 5:53 pm, Adam Weinberger wrote: On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 4:45 PM Dave Horsfall wrote: On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Adam Weinberger wrote: > That error should only occur if system sources are missing from > /usr/src. Check that they're still there, and if not then check them out > from

Re: lsof marked ignored

2020-03-20 Thread Adam Weinberger
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 4:45 PM Dave Horsfall wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > > That error should only occur if system sources are missing from > > /usr/src. Check that they're still there, and if not then check them out > > from svn. > > Does it not require kernel

Re: lsof marked ignored

2020-03-20 Thread Dave Horsfall
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Adam Weinberger wrote: That error should only occur if system sources are missing from /usr/src. Check that they're still there, and if not then check them out from svn. Does it not require kernel header files only? Only distributed with the source, which annoyed me

Re: lsof marked ignored

2020-03-20 Thread @lbutlr
On 20 Mar 2020, at 15:30, @lbutlr wrote: > PORTS+MODULE=sysutils/lsof Oops. -- Say, give it up, give it up, television's taking its toll That's enough, that's enough, gimme the remote control I've been nice, I've been good, please don't do this to me Turn it off, turn it

Re: lsof marked ignored

2020-03-20 Thread @lbutlr
On 20 Mar 2020, at 14:10, Robert Huff wrote: > Adam Weinberger writes: > >>> ===>>> Currently installed version: lsof-4.93.2_9,8 >>> ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/lsof >>> >>>===>>> This port is marked IGNORE >>>===>>> requires kernel sources >> >> That error

Re: lsof marked ignored

2020-03-20 Thread Robert Huff
Adam Weinberger writes: > > ===>>> Currently installed version: lsof-4.93.2_9,8 > > ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/lsof > > > > ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE > > ===>>> requires kernel sources > > That error should only occur if system sources are missing

Re: lsof marked ignored

2020-03-20 Thread Adam Weinberger
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 1:02 PM @lbutlr wrote: > > Got this when trying tu update lsof: > > ===>>> lsof-4.93.2_9,8 > ===>>> New version available: lsof-4.93.2_10,8 > > ===>>> Currently installed version: lsof-4.93.2_9,8 > ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/lsof > > ===>>>

lsof marked ignored

2020-03-20 Thread @lbutlr
Got this when trying tu update lsof: ===>>> lsof-4.93.2_9,8 ===>>> New version available: lsof-4.93.2_10,8 ===>>> Currently installed version: lsof-4.93.2_9,8 ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/sysutils/lsof ===>>> This port is marked IGNORE ===>>> requires kernel sources

Re: Poudriere error: cannot rollback ..., there is a snapshot ... more recent ....

2020-03-20 Thread George Hartzell
Miroslav Lachman writes: > [...] > Any possibility that you have some kind of automatic snapshoting utility > run from crontab recursively on filesystem where poudriere have builder > jails mounted? > > I saw this error when I setup zfsnap in crontab with resursive snapshot > of /vol0

Re: Poudriere error: cannot rollback ..., there is a snapshot ... more recent ....

2020-03-20 Thread Miroslav Lachman
George Hartzell wrote on 2020/03/20 18:13: I have a FreeBSD 12.1p3 (just updated) root-on-zfs system that's having trouble doing Poudriere builds. It started off life as a FreeBSD 12.1 system and has been building it's own set of packages using Poudriere successfully since its inception. I

Poudriere error: cannot rollback ..., there is a snapshot ... more recent ....

2020-03-20 Thread George Hartzell
I have a FreeBSD 12.1p3 (just updated) root-on-zfs system that's having trouble doing Poudriere builds. It started off life as a FreeBSD 12.1 system and has been building it's own set of packages using Poudriere successfully since its inception. I few updates ago I started seeing errors in the

[CFT] deskutils/calibre python 3 support

2020-03-20 Thread Guido Falsi
Hello! I have committed just now changes to the calibre port to add an option to build it against python 3. (r528772) As you all know python 2 is on it's way out and all software must be migrated, or removed from the ports tree. You may also know that calibre porting to python 3 is still

Re: FreeBSD Port: atom-ide-1.45.0 Error build

2020-03-20 Thread Hiroki Tagato
Hi Mateusz, Thanks for the suggestion. I didn't know a package (and a version) could be specified as a dependency. I will amend the dependency line next time I update the port. Thanks, Hiroki On 2020/03/19 1:21, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote: On 3/18/20 5:12 PM, Alex V. Petrov wrote: