Mk/Uses/gnustep.mk uses incorrect GNUSTEP_LOCAL_LIBRARIES

I'd raise a PR but Mk is immune. The problem: devel/sope4 failure to build due to: ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libgnustep-base.so.1.26" not found, required by "plmerge" Investigation: # make -C /usr/ports/devel/sope4 -VGNUSTEP_LOCAL_LIBRARIES /usr/local/GNUstep/Local/Library/Libraries # ls

Re: FreeBSD Port: nut-2.7.4_13

In message <20200324203107.gz37...@home.opsec.eu>, Kurt Jaeger writes: > Hi! > > > Is it an idea to switch NUT port so that it can use master sources from > > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut for NUT port? > > Sure, do you have a patch/PR... ? > > > Right now we are missing 3 years of

Re: FreeBSD Port: nut-2.7.4_13

Hi! > Is it an idea to switch NUT port so that it can use master sources from > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut for NUT port? Sure, do you have a patch/PR... ? > Right now we are missing 3 years of upstream code improvements, updated and > new drivers and bug fixes. > > An newer release

Re: FreeBSD Port: nut-2.7.4_13

In message <01d60217$821d4cf0$8657e6d0$@quicknet.nl>, "Dutchman01" writes: > This is a multipart message in MIME format. > > Is it an idea to switch NUT port so that it can use master sources from > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut for NUT port? > > > > Right now we are missing 3

FreeBSD Port: nut-2.7.4_13

Is it an idea to switch NUT port so that it can use master sources from https://github.com/networkupstools/nut for NUT port? Right now we are missing 3 years of upstream code improvements, updated and new drivers and bug fixes. An newer release will not see soon its light. USE_GITHUB=

Re: games/devilutionx update: please commit

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 5:42 PM Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > Hello, > > Could a commiter please look at 244722 > > (games/devilutionx update) and 244399 > (games/cursive > adoption)?

games/devilutionx update: please commit

Hello, Could a commiter please look at 244722 (games/devilutionx update) and 244399 (games/cursive adoption)? Thanks, Nuno Teixeira

Re: reccomendations of conference / party audio video software ?

On 3/24/20 11:31 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 04:38:11PM +, Bob Eager wrote: People have been saying good things about jitsi (Java based) bu the port didn't work on a quick try (my ports tree isn't very new though and there was no time to update it). The port is

Re: reccomendations of conference / party audio video software ?

On 24/03/2020 9:31 pm, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 04:38:11PM +, Bob Eager wrote: People have been saying good things about jitsi (Java based) bu the port didn't work on a quick try (my ports tree isn't very new though and there was no time to update it). The port is

Re: reccomendations of conference / party audio video software ?

On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 04:38:11PM +, Bob Eager wrote: > People have been saying good things about jitsi (Java based) bu the > port didn't work on a quick try (my ports tree isn't very new though > and there was no time to update it). > The port is about a previous thing from jitsi (a SIP

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,