Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

2020-08-04 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > > > * This migration away from portsnap fits well with the planned > > > > migration to git. > > Have a look at the archive, and yes, subversion as version control > > system for the FreeBSD project will probably be replaced by git. > This is very bad news for us. I can make so many

Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

2020-08-04 Thread Chris
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 06:40:39 +0200 Kurt Jaeger p...@freebsd.org said Hi! > > * This migration away from portsnap fits well with the planned > > migration to git. > Please tell me that this doesn't mean a > > [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of subversion > > is on the horizon. There's a list

Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

2020-08-04 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > * This migration away from portsnap fits well with the planned > > migration to git. > Please tell me that this doesn't mean a > > [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of subversion > > is on the horizon. There's a list where the git topic is discussed:

Announcing the version 1.0 hexpeek release!

2020-08-04 Thread hexpeek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Announcing the version 1.0 hexpeek release! I am pleased to announce the first stable release of hexpeek, which seeks to be an efficient, powerful, and portable hex editor for files of all kinds and sizes. This release improves on the beta

Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

2020-08-04 Thread Chris
On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 14:43:20 -0400 Steve Wills swi...@freebsd.org said We are planning to deprecate use of portsnap in ports. ... Makes sense to me. Thank you. :-) * Portsnap doesn't seem to save disk space compared to svn or git, if you count the metadata (stored in /var/db/portsnap by

[HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

2020-08-04 Thread Steve Wills
We are planning to deprecate use of portsnap in ports. The reasons are as follows (in no particular order): * Portsnap doesn't support quarterly branches, even years after quarterly branches were created and changed to the default for non-HEAD packages. * Portsnap doesn't seem to save

Re: Chromium (& derivatives) and Python 2.7

2020-08-04 Thread Ronald Klop
On Tue, 04 Aug 2020 16:20:01 +0200, Lars Liedtke wrote: At least in Ubuntu the mongodb 3.6 package does not depend on python2. Package: mongodb-server-core Version: 1:3.6.9+really3.6.8+90~g8e540c0b6d-0ubuntu5 Priority: optional Section: universe/database Source: mongodb Origin: Ubuntu

Re: Chromium (& derivatives) and Python 2.7

2020-08-04 Thread Lars Liedtke
At least in Ubuntu the mongodb 3.6 package does not depend on python2. > Package: mongodb-server-core > Version: 1:3.6.9+really3.6.8+90~g8e540c0b6d-0ubuntu5 > Priority: optional > Section: universe/database > Source: mongodb > Origin: Ubuntu > Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers > Original-Maintainer:

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2020-08-04 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,