Re: freebsd-update and portsnap users still at risk of compromise

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Matthew Donovan wrote: > You mean operating system as distribution is a Linux term. There's not much > different between HARDENEDBSD and FreeBSD besides that HardenedBSD fixes > vulnerabilities and has a an excellent ASLR system compared to

Re: Hi, I'd like to update the coreos-etcd port!

Hi John, There's a bit more in that than simply updating the port, and it simply needs some more of my time. Also, mind, that emailing the maintainer directly is not the best way of communication, you'd be better if you've created a PR and/or review for it (one already exists and waits for me to

Re: pkg 1.5.0 is out

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: Hi all, Final pkg 1.5.0 has been released. Best regards, Bapt Congratulations to entire pkg team and thanks for your hard work! I've one question - how does the OSX support work? What are plans for it? What

Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0

I just wanted to take the time to thank you for all the work you've put into this. Thanks! Thanks much appreciated, I want to share that with vsevolod@ and az@ who also spent a lot of time working on it! Indeed, HUGE THANKS for what you guys are doing with pkg - I cant wait to see that OS

Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0

Please test and report as much bugs as you can! We could be very grateful if regressions tests could be provided along with the bug reports :) Mine just did something like that: foobar# uname -a FreeBSD foobar.org 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r280994M: Thu Apr 2 20:16:53 CEST

Re: FreeBSD ports/ Wishlist

On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Henk van Oers h...@signature.nl wrote: I want to put https://github.com/ingydotnet/git-hub on the wishlist. But https://wiki.freebsd.org/action/newaccount/PortsWishlist?action=newaccount returns with: Unknown action newaccount. :(

Re: Reading jail(8) conf files using perl ?

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Kurt Jaeger li...@opsec.eu wrote: Hi! Does anyone know of a perl module that reads and writes jail(8) (fbsd 10) config files and can point me to it ? Thanks! -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 6 years to go !

Re: Abandoning the sguil ports

Hi, On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Muhammad Moinur Rahman 5u623...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Paul, I want to take those. BR, Muhammad I am not sure if you are aware, but there is PR 183112 regarding sguil port, that is waiting for a relatively simple fix. Do you mind taking the diff attached

Re: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

I've submitted a patch updating graphics/sng and taking maintainership: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188775 Regards, BL On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:19 AM, portsc...@freebsd.org wrote: Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more

Re: poudriere-devel and index.html

This has changed in recent poudriere-devel - please, see the '/usr/local/share/examples/poudriere/nginx.conf.sample' Nginx configuration example to see how it is being done right now. Regards, BL On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk wrote: I asked 2 weeks ago,

Re: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Patch with update submitted in ports/190404 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/190404. Regards, BL On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:48 AM, portsc...@freebsd.org wrote: Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be

Re: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Patch with update submitted in ports/190404 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/190404. Regards, BL On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:48 AM, portsc...@freebsd.org wrote: Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be

Re: Disappearing programs: Is FreeBSD ports unmaintained?

Dear Joerg, The only problem is that if such port is unmaintained (its maintainer email address is po...@freebsd.org) there's no one who could do such thing, because commiters are busy working on the entire ports tree, and apparently no one from maintainers was interested in the port to do so. If

Re: ACTION REQUIRED - Unstaged Ports being DEPRECATED on June 31st.

On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Vick Khera vi...@khera.org wrote: On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Bryan Drewery bdrew...@freebsd.org wrote: You are receiving this mail as it affects FreeBSD ports that you maintain. Clearly you have a list that identifies these ports. Would it be

Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Tijl Coosemans t...@coosemans.org wrote: On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 13:12:48 -0400 Mikhail T. wrote: On 08.04.2014 12:55, Tijl Coosemans wrote: On Tue, 08 Apr 2014 09:57:48 -0400 Mikhail T. wrote: On 08.04.2014 08:00, freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org wrote: If

Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:28 AM, John Marino freebsd.cont...@marino.stwrote: On 4/9/2014 11:22, Big Lebowski wrote: While we are not having any way to measure ports usage (or am I wrong here?), we're still building packages from ports, and I would hope that we could get some statistics

Re: LPPL10 license consequences intended? (arabic/arabtex)

I just wanted to express my general concerns, since in past I was also making posts in the tone of the OP, and I wanted people to speak up so badly, I decided not to remain silent this time, even if the original problem is not really on my playground. I would also like to see portmgr actively

Re: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Sorry guys, I couldnt take it anymore ;) I've updated the port to latest 1.13.2 version and also added portscout limit so it should no longer consider these nightly builds as real updates. I'd love you guys to test the port (shar attached), since I can only do the build tests (successful, so far)

Re: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Ooops, the attachment was missed, so you can grab the port from here: https://redports.org/browser/rbk/games/doomsday Regards, BL On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Big Lebowski spankthes...@gmail.comwrote: Sorry guys, I couldnt take it anymore ;) I've updated the port to latest 1.13.2

Fwd: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

I am happy to report that my PR with update and a fix for portscout discarding beta builds as actual updates have been accepted today, so this should not be an issue for a while ;) Regards, BL On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Philippe Audéoud jada...@freebsd.orgwrote: On Fri, 14 Mar 2014,

Re: FreeBSD Port: abills-0.54

I've just updated abills port to 0.55 version, enjoy. Regards, BL On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Maxim Sirenko ma...@rivne.uar.net wrote: Hi all! I highly appreciate the feedback I received on this topic! I couldn't even expect it! As regards abills -- there are no such changes between

Re: ports/179004: update devel/zookeeper

Hi, There's already my PR with that update hanging around for quite some time... http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=185896 How come mine can hang for so long, while other one is being accepted and processed quite quickly? On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:44 PM, g...@freebsd.org wrote:

Issues with Poudriere builing packages depending on Perl

Hi, I am trying to build bunch on packages in Poudriere on 10-R for 10-R and 9.2-R. The packages are building fine, but for some reason at least one of them builds with two different perl versions, 5.16 and 5.18. I would like to get all my packages built with 5.18, so in my make.conf for

Re: Issues with Poudriere builing packages depending on Perl

Anyone? On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Big Lebowski spankthes...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am trying to build bunch on packages in Poudriere on 10-R for 10-R and 9.2-R. The packages are building fine, but for some reason at least one of them builds with two different perl versions, 5.16

Re: [FreeBSD-Ports-Announce] Time to bid farewell to the old pkg_ tools

On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote: On 05/02/2014 23:57, Kevin Oberman wrote: 1. The ports/packages system is not total crap. In fact, at the time jkh started it, it was far superior to any tool available. When I first encountered the

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

Unfortunately, nothing is happening. I expected to hear some voices about certain ideas that have popped up, like: * can we cut off old and 'unloved' PR's in order to reduce the amount of work and make reassessment of that amount * can we use people who volunteered to work on the PR's * can we

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.orgwrote: On 25/01/2014 10:35, Big Lebowski wrote: Thus, are you volunteering for this role? It's not my call, but if you really want to do clean out and triage the all PRs on an ongoing basis, my guess is that would

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Jim Ohlstein j...@ohlste.in wrote: Hello, On 1/25/14, 9:04 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote: On 1/25/14 3:48 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote: On 01/25/2014 14:44, Aryeh Friedman wrote: The key seems to

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Gary J. Hayers g...@hayers.org wrote: On 26/01/2014 13:06, Big Lebowski wrote: On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.org wrote: Does it have to be all-or-nothing situation, where we can do something only if we have 20-50 people

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Gary J. Hayers g...@hayers.org wrote: On 26/01/2014 13:32, Big Lebowski wrote: On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Gary J. Hayers g...@hayers.org wrote: Suspect this would work, however, the more committers the less the quality of work? Is there any

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:47 AM, John Marino freebsd.cont...@marino.stwrote: On 1/25/2014 01:36, Big Lebowski wrote: I was hoping to get some discussion revealing how the work is organized around ports PR, perhaps some ideas on improving them and I hoped that people who can make decisions

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Alfred Perlstein alf...@freebsd.orgwrote: On 1/24/14, 11:45 PM, John Marino wrote: On 1/25/2014 05:16, Alfred Perlstein wrote: Thus, are you volunteering for this role? It's not my call, but if you really want to do clean out and triage the all PRs on an

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Bernhard Fröhlich de...@bluelife.atwrote: Am 25.01.2014 02:12 schrieb Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com: I think you've got me wrong - I am following freebsd-virtualization list very closely, and the matter I've touched here is not my doubt on

What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

Hi everyone, I wanted to ask about the growing time of reaction to ports PR's - what is the problem? It seems to me, as a ports contributor, that this time is only growing, not shrinking, and there's no formal/automated procedures that would help in managing the issue. Today I found myself

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:45 AM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.comwrote: On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Big Lebowski spankthes...@gmail.comwrote: Hi everyone, I wanted to ask about the growing time of reaction to ports PR's - what is the problem? It seems to me, as a ports

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:41 AM, John Marino freebsd.cont...@marino.stwrote: On 1/25/2014 00:30, Big Lebowski wrote: Hi everyone, I wanted to ask about the growing time of reaction to ports PR's - what is the problem? It seems to me, as a ports contributor, that this time is only

Re: What is the problem with ports PR reaction delays?

On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 1:22 AM, John Marino freebsd.cont...@marino.stwrote: On 1/25/2014 01:03, Big Lebowski wrote: On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:41 AM, John Marino freebsd.cont...@marino.st wrote: On 1/25/2014 00:30, Big Lebowski wrote: Hi everyone, I wanted to ask about the growing

Re: Request for porting SoftEther VPN

Hi, I've almost the port ready, but I am just struggling with decision wether I want to write patches for it, or not. The software is quite badly written, and it expects a certain data file to exist... in the same directory as the binaries. Normally, I'd install binaries to /usr/local/bin, but in

Re: Request for porting SoftEther VPN

small scripts in ${PREFIX}/bin that act as wrapper. Finally - a small rc script to enable starting / stopping the entire thing. Kind regards On Fri, 17 Jan 2014, Big Lebowski wrote: Hi, I've almost the port ready, but I am just struggling with decision wether I want to write

Solving PORTNAME/PORTREVISION/DISTNAME/DISTVERSION mess

Hi, I am working on updating databases/postgresql-libpqxx to use sources with version 4.0.1. The current PORTVERSION is 4.0, and the 4.0.1 sources are not bumping the lib version, are not changing the lib api version, but instead, have compile bug fixes. That suggest using PORTREVISION at 1, to

Re: Solving PORTNAME/PORTREVISION/DISTNAME/DISTVERSION mess

was exactly what I was looking for, though! On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Mark Felder f...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 8, 2014, at 8:10, Big Lebowski wrote: Hi, I am working on updating databases/postgresql-libpqxx to use sources with version 4.0.1. The current PORTVERSION is 4.0

Re: www/rubygem-passenger: link error on 10.0-PRERELEASE r259862M

Hi, I would like to confirm that issue: I've ecountered it while trying to compile rubygem-passenger-4.0.30 from ports on FreeBSD 10.0-RC3 amd64, fresh ISO installation. Is there anything happening about that? Do we know if its CLANG issue of Passenger one, and should be reported to them?

Re: www/rubygem-passenger: link error on 10.0-PRERELEASE r259862M

. On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Big Lebowski spankthes...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I would like to confirm that issue: I've ecountered it while trying to compile rubygem-passenger-4.0.30 from ports on FreeBSD 10.0-RC3 amd64, fresh ISO installation. Is there anything happening about that? Do we know

Re: Best way to make the port install another port

On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Big Lebowski spankthes...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I wanted to add an option to one of my ports to optionally install commandline tool, that's in another port. Doing the options part is easy and clear, but how should I add that port to build procedure to do

Re: Best way to make the port install another port

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Lowell Gilbert freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote: Torfinn Ingolfsen tin...@gmail.com writes: On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Big Lebowski spankthes...@gmail.com wrote: Just bumping it in a hope of someone actually knowing the answer... Look

Biuilding ports without Makefiles using different lang compiler

Hi list, I am working on a new port, that's a software written in Go, which doesnt have a Makefile in sources, and I am wondering that's the right way to write it: I could use NO_BUILD and in pre-install cdw to relevant directory and invoke compiler libary and its target, like 'go build' (using

Re: Help in testing Basho Riak port

Hi, everyone! I am proud to announce, that I've finished testing and the port has reached the point where it was good enough for send-pr, so, here it is: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/182317 Once it gets commited, I'll be even more proud ;) and will move on to port few more

Re: Fwd: Help in testing Basho Riak port

On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Bryan Drewery br...@shatow.net wrote: On 9/21/2013 5:08 PM, Big Lebowski wrote: On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Bryan Drewery br...@shatow.net wrote: You also need this in the pkg-plist to fix it being a leftover: @dirrmtry %%RIAK_DBDIR

Re: Fwd: Help in testing Basho Riak port

On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Bryan Drewery br...@shatow.net wrote: On 9/21/2013 5:08 PM, Big Lebowski wrote: Hi, Thanks for your comments, see mine below. On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Bryan Drewery br...@shatow.net wrote: On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 06:57:52PM +0100, Big

Re: Help in testing Basho Riak port

Again, updated version with following fixes: * using %%ETCDIR%% * deleting /var/db/riak if empty * patch for GCC 4.2 on 8.3 * fix in riak rc.d script * erlang dependency changed to specific erlang runtime version to fix issues with Erlang 16 on the system Please, let me know if you find

Re: Help in testing Basho Riak port

Thank you all for your work and valuable comments! Please, test the latest version of the port, that you can find here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/me9ej0br78ayws1/riak.20130921.tgz and let me know if you can find any issues. Kind regards, B. On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Big Lebowski

Fwd: Help in testing Basho Riak port

Hi, Thanks for your comments, see mine below. On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Bryan Drewery br...@shatow.net wrote: On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 06:57:52PM +0100, Big Lebowski wrote: Hi list! I've been working for couple last days on porting Basho Riak database (latest version 1.4.2

Fwd: Help in testing Basho Riak port

. That will only remove the directory if it is empty. On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 06:57:52PM +0100, Big Lebowski wrote: Hi list! I've been working for couple last days on porting Basho Riak database (latest version 1.4.2) and finally I think it is ready to be presented: https

Fwd: Help in testing Basho Riak port

On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sep 21, 2013, at 21:58, Big Lebowski spankthes...@gmail.com wrote: ... While this is of course true, their package has some issues: * it doesnt work with pkgng - mine, built with make package from port does

Help in testing Basho Riak port

Hi list! I've been working for couple last days on porting Basho Riak database (latest version 1.4.2) and finally I think it is ready to be presented: https://www.dropbox.com/s/2ztu2bdiip1u2un/riak.tgz Please, grab the port and test it on anything you can, break it in any way possible, and