Re: Large builds with poudriere

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 03:09:32PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com wrote on > Thu May 20 21:37:28 UTC 2021 : > > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:48 PM Mark Millard wrote: > > > > > Kevin Oberman rkoberman at gmail.com wrote on > > > Thu May 20 19:21:24 UTC 2021 :

Re: Any plan to fix ports git main history compatibility with old GitHub master?

On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 05:33:08PM -0300, Eric Turgeon wrote: > Today when trying to sync the GhostBSD ports tree with the FreeBSD ports > tree, I found out the main branch history is not compatible with the old > GitHub master. > > Any plan to migrate to main with hold git history as we had with

Re: devel/llvm11 failed to build

On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 09:20:00AM +0900, KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko wrote: > Hi, all > > I've changed Makefile so as to include *mmintrin.h as > follows: > > --- /home/kiri/work/ports/head/devel/llvm11/Makefile 2020-11-09 > 12:30:07.0 +0900 > +++ llvm11/Makefile 2020-11-29 17:12:58.544495000

Re: [HEADS UP] Planned deprecation of portsnap

On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 11:48:34AM -0400, Greg Veldman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 03:43:38PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > The real question is: Will we design things in a way that we expect ports > > tree users to always install git and its dependencies on their system or > > not (long

Re: Fwd: AFFECTS: users of devel/kuya

Thanks for the report, I make that typo all the time. Thanks also to bapt@ for fixing. -- Brooks On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 08:16:59AM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > Should that be devel/kyua? > > Not to be nitpicking, but someone might try grep on UPDATING :) > > bye > av.

Re: Poudriere make.conf documentation question

On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 09:42:51AM -0700, Jose Quinteiro wrote: > Hello, > > The Handbook says: > "The system make.conf and this new file are combined at build time to > create the make.conf used by the build jail." > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ports-poudriere.html > > The poudriere

Re: llvm80-8.0.1_3 needs Python 3.6 at least, but 2.7 was specified.

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 08:44:59AM -0800, Chris wrote: > I'm testing modifications of ports I maintain in > a jail. I have nothing in make.conf(5) except > DEVELOPER=true > But I get messages regarding python versions like: > llvm80-8.0.1_3 needs Python 3.6 at least, but 2.7 was specified. > But I

Re: amd64->{armv7,aarc64} cross builds of devel/llvm10 (via poudriere-devel): failed in package stage for missing libarcher* files

Fixed in r526532. Thanks for the hint that it was in OPENMP. -- Brooks On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 08:19:26PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2020-Feb-17, at 09:56, Mark Millard wrote: > > > On 2020-Feb-17, at 09:53, Mark Millard wrote: > > > >> [The native arm64 build worked fine. But the

Re: devel/llvm80 port on 12.1

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 04:42:07PM +0100, Lars Engels wrote: > I'm trying reduce the size of the NomadBSD image and the biggest > installed package is devel/llvm80 with 848 MiB. > llvm80 is a dependency of graphics/mesa-dri which is needed for > x11-servers/xorg-server. > > Looking at the llvm

Re: Checking you the maintainer of a port?

On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 02:05:56PM -0700, Janky Jay, III wrote: > Hello, > > On 11/27/19 2:03 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > > I thought that the maintainer of a port was listed somewhere in the files > > at user/ports//portbase/ but evidently not. What is the easiest way > > to find out, sitting in

Re: devel/llvm90 requires math/z3 first; building math/z3 requires a c++ toolchain be in place

On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 01:42:26PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > > > On 2019-Aug-7, at 12:56, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 11:55:04AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 2019-Aug-7, at 11:02, Brooks Davis wrote: &

Re: devel/llvm90 requires math/z3 first; building math/z3 requires a c++ toolchain be in place

On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 11:55:04AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > > > On 2019-Aug-7, at 11:02, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 05:17:14PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 09:22:52PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > >>>

Re: devel/llvm90 requires math/z3 first; building math/z3 requires a c++ toolchain be in place

On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 05:17:14PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 09:22:52PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > > [I found something known to be missing in the > > in at least some versions of > > llvm/cmake/modules/CrossCompile.cmake that messes > &

Re: devel/llvm90 requires math/z3 first; building math/z3 requires a c++ toolchain be in place

ark Millard wrote: > > > > > On 2019-Aug-6, at 19:08, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 05:59:21PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> On 2019-Aug-6, at 09:55, Brooks Davis wrote: > >>&

Re: devel/llvm90 requires math/z3 first; building math/z3 requires a c++ toolchain be in place

On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 05:59:21PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > > > On 2019-Aug-6, at 09:55, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > I'd prefer to disable this dependency. There's a knob that worked in > > the 8.0 timeframe, but the lit build now autodetects z3 when it is >

Re: devel/llvm90 requires math/z3 first; building math/z3 requires a c++ toolchain be in place

I'd prefer to disable this dependency. There's a knob that worked in the 8.0 timeframe, but the lit build now autodetects z3 when it is present and I've failed to find a knob to disable it. For now, the easy workaround is probably to disable options LIT. We could make that the default on

Re: devel/llvm80 requires many python 2.7 ports?

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 02:57:29PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > I just went to build llvm80 after discovering that I could not install the > package without moving from the drfault samba48 back to the deprecated > samba47. > > When I try to build the port, I get: > Upgrade llvm80-8.0.0_2 to

LLVM 7.1.0: how to proceed?

LLVM 7.1.0 will be release shortly and contains a single fix which breaks the LLVM Libra ABI in order to fix an incompatibility with GCC 8.2. A bug describing the issue is at https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39427. My current plan is: - Copy devel/llvm70 to devel/llvm71 and update. -

Re: sphinx-build not found

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 05:03:54PM -0700, Russell L. Carter wrote: > Greetings, > > Quite a few ports are now being skipped by the not unheard of > problem with "sphinx-build not found". Including llvm6 and 7. > I've checked UPDATING and google, but no hints, other than this > problem has

Re: git checkout branch in makefile

On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 08:19:13PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > On 9. Jul 2018, at 19:34, blubee blubeeme wrote: > > > > Is it possible to do a git checkout of a specific branch in a ports > > makefile? > > > > How would I go about checking out a particular branch from a github

Re: RTTI support in devel/llvm40 (and maybe other llvm ports)

On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 11:15:53PM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 07:41:04PM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 08:03:19AM +0000, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 02:07:48PM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >

Re: Suggestion: USES=autoplist

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 12:51:56AM -0800, Yuri wrote: > On 11/22/17 08:59, Brooks Davis wrote: > > Looking to the future, is the port an obviously candidate for FLAVORS or > > multi-packages? If so, they you probably want to keep the current > > plist. If not, then I gue

Re: Suggestion: USES=autoplist

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 09:04:22PM -0800, Yuri wrote: > While trying to update math/vtk, I found that its plist is very complex, > with many optional files, some files depending on multiple port options. > > But it is a well-behaved project, and it only installs the correct file > set. It is

Re: What is the correct way to require a specific version of clang?

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 01:43:29PM -0800, Yuri wrote: > On 11/15/17 11:58, Brooks Davis wrote: > > You'll need to start a shell in your poudreire instance and see what is > > failing. I'd expect that to work. > > > > Note that it is possible to m

Re: What is the correct way to require a specific version of clang?

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:37:37AM -0800, Yuri wrote: > There is no such thing as USES=clang:38, for example. > > When I try this: > > .include > > .if ${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && ${OSVERSION} < 110 > BUILD_DEPENDS=?? clang38:lang/clang38 > RUN_DEPENDS=?? clang38:lang/clang38 >

Re: [Bug 223383] pathconf querying for posix_falloc not supported on freebsd [devel/llvm*'s lld's are also broken by this for zfs and need updating]

I'll work on this. -- Brooks On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 07:09:00PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > [ devel/llvm* also have the issue in their > lld 's.] > > On 2017-Nov-7, at 4:43 PM, bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org wrote: > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223383 > > > > ---

Re: RTTI support in devel/llvm40 (and maybe other llvm ports)

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 02:07:48PM +0700, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > Hi Brooks, > > I've just found out that our `devel/llvm40' port comes without > -DLLVM_ENABLE_RTTI=ON on the CMAKE_ARGS. This is a regression > from e.g. 3.4 times when it was enabled by default. > > The problem is that RTTI

Re: FYI: what it takes for RAM+swap to build devel/llvm40 with 4 processors or cores and WITH__DEBUG= (powerpc64 example)

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:26:19PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 30 Mar 2017, at 19:06, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:41:40AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > >> On 26 Mar 2017, at 23:36, Mark Millard wrote: > >>> ... > >>>

Re: FYI: what it takes for RAM+swap to build devel/llvm40 with 4 processors or cores and WITH__DEBUG= (powerpc64 example)

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 03:25:04AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2017-Mar-27, at 2:41 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > > On 26 Mar 2017, at 23:36, Mark Millard wrote: > >> > >> I upgraded from llvm40 r4 to final. An interesting result was > >> its creation

Re: hard links in llvm39 and binutils

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:18:19AM -0800, j...@theusgroup.com wrote: > In your message you wrote: > > ... > >On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:54:27PM -0800, john--- via freebsd-ports > >wrote: > Both llvm39 and binutils failed to install recently because > >they both have > hard links that cross

Re: hard links in llvm39 and binutils

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:54:27PM -0800, john--- via freebsd-ports wrote: > Both llvm39 and binutils failed to install recently because they both have > hard links that cross directories. On this machine, those directories, both > in /usr/local on on different zfs filesystems. > > I've had this

Re: clang support for compiler:openmp

On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:12:59PM +0100, Matthieu Volat wrote: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 16:59:36 + > Brooks Davis <bro...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 08:36:22AM +0100, Marcus von Appen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > is there a

Re: 398 out of 1025 ports failed because of llvm37 compilation error

On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 05:44:39PM +, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > > On 22/10/2016 16:04, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > > How to fix it? > > > > [00:52:02] >> [02][00:42:43] Finished build of devel/llvm37: > > Failed: build > > > > Exception occurred: > > File

Re: llvm37 build fail, FreeBSD 10.3

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 12:30:59PM +0100, Dave wrote: > building llvm37 from ports (via portupgrade), fails on at least 10.3 > > Requires re2c and ninja but neither are pulled in, build fails unless > manually installed first. Something is seriously out of wack with portupgrade or perhaps your

Re: Help with making a port C11 compliant

On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 04:16:54PM +, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote: > Here is my problem: > http://beefy2.nyi.freebsd.org/data/93amd64-default/414631/logs/GiNaC-1.7.0.log > > the configure script says: > configure: error: Standard ISO C++ headers are missing > > In the Makefile I have the

Re: head / poudriere && devel/llvm37 Killing timed out build after 86400 seconds

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 02:46:15PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El d??a Tuesday, May 03, 2016 a las 10:11:44AM +0100, Bob Eager escribi??: > > > I was forced to build llvm37 without documentation. It worked then. > > My poudriere oven at home is a Dell M4400 with 2 CPUs and 4 GB RAM. I > have

Re: Pulling from github as a vendorized dependency in poudriere

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 07:13:04AM -0500, Derek (freebsd lists) wrote: > Hi, > > I'm attempting to port a project over, and it is dependent on a > "vendorizing" program, which then pulls in the source of the > dependencies to build. (The final artifact is statically linked, > so there

Re: error upgrading graphics/dri port "/usr/local/llvm36/bin/clang: not found"

On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 07:08:14PM +1100, Graham Menhennitt wrote: > Does anybody have any clues, please? > > Thanks, > Graham > > root@starker# uname -a > FreeBSD starker 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #17 r294103: Sun Jan > 17 13:26:05 AEDT 2016 >

Re: llvm37 python3 problem

und this by disabling the LLDB option when building. -- Brooks > 12 octobre 2015 19:50 "Brooks Davis" <bro...@freebsd.org> a ??crit: > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 04:38:57PM +0200, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > > > >> Can't test the patch in the above link, c

Re: 9.3 to 10.2 migration, determining if clang is used

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:13:11AM -0700, Patrick Powell wrote: > I just started doing a 9.3 to 10.2 migration of a bunch of applications > and discovered that some of the options used > to generate the applications were slightly different. I just know that > this has been covered before, but

Re: llvm37 python3 problem

On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 04:38:57PM +0200, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > Can't test the patch in the above link, cause the port ignores python > 3.4 and I don't want deinstall python 2.7. I've figured out how to reconfigure poudriere to be able to test this. Several other files need this sort of

Re: devel/llvm36/plist has 2 non existant files

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:18:48AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Brooks Davis wrote: > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 05:10:06PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > >=20 > > > Brooks Davis wrote: Mon, 21

Re: devel/llvm36/plist has 2 non existant files

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 05:10:06PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Brooks Davis wrote: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 21:21:30 + > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 01:30:54AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > Hi

Re: devel/llvm36/plist has 2 non existant files

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 01:30:54AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi bro...@freebsd.org, > cc: po...@freebsd.org > > with current devel/llvm36 > FreeBSD lapr.js.berklix.net 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #12135: Thu Sep > 17 14:54:15 CEST 2015 >

Re: Does OpenMP (iomp5) work for clang-devel?

On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 10:21:26PM +0930, Shane Ambler wrote: On 21/07/2015 18:06, Shane Ambler wrote: On 21/07/2015 10:59, Dennis Glatting wrote: On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 01:07 +, Brooks Davis wrote: On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:48:58PM -0700, Dennis Glatting wrote: I can't seem to get

Re: svn commit: r392851 - in head: . devel devel/libiomp5-devel devel/llvm-devel devel/llvm-devel/files lang/clang-devel lang/clang-devel/files

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:40:10PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: Author: brooks Date: Fri Jul 24 23:40:09 2015 New Revision: 392851 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/392851 Log: Mostly complete redo to the build of -devel LLVM ports: - Switch to cmake. - Combine all

Re: Does OpenMP (iomp5) work for clang-devel?

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:48:58PM -0700, Dennis Glatting wrote: I can't seem to get this working and it appears not to emit code. I have libiomp5 installed and I compile specifying: clang++-devel -fopenmp=libiomp5 ... And the compiler says: clang: warning: argument unused during

Re: mail/postfix default build options request: SASL

On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:45:53PM +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote: On 7/07/2015 3:31 PM, Gregory Orange wrote: Hi Olli and ports@, I don't know if this is a helpful forum to raise it, but I would like to request that SASL be enabled in the default build options for mail/postfix. I am

Re: powerpc64 11.0-CURRENT portmaster lang/clang36 gets error: llvm-build: error: invalid native target: 'powerpc64' (not in project)

It appears that I added powerpc64 (and several others) to the devel/llvm* ports version of this patch, but didn't do it for lang/clang*. I'll sync them up. -- Brooks On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 08:02:47PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: patch-utils_llvm-build_llvmbuild_main.py is missing a powerpc64

Re: Place of LICENSE_FILE in Makefile

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 08:35:36PM +0200, Fernando Apestegu?a wrote: Hi, I'm facing a situation with a new Makefile. I want to set LICENSE_FILE to the location of the license file of the distribution. The file is located under ${WRKSRC} that has been set to

Re: Updating ports that require cclang33 almost comes to a standstill!

On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 05:48:59PM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote: Brooks Davis skrev 2014-07-17 16:10: On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 02:54:09PM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote: Dimitry Andric skrev 2014-07-17 00:10: On 16 Jul 2014, at 11:21, Leslie Jensen jensen.les...@gmail.com wrote: Hello list

Re: HOWTO articles for migrating from Linux to FreeBSD, especially for pkg?

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:07:39PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 01:57:52PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: On 17 July 2014 13:54, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:21:17PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote: On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at

Re: Updating ports that require cclang33 almost comes to a standstill!

On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 02:54:09PM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote: Dimitry Andric skrev 2014-07-17 00:10: On 16 Jul 2014, at 11:21, Leslie Jensen jensen.les...@gmail.com wrote: Hello list. I'm experiencing a very slow build of clang33 It seems that it's when building

Re: FreeBSD ports that you maintain require staging updates

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 03:44:54AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 09:35:53AM +0900, oyaaji wrote: Dear Sir/Madam, I have received following e-mail. However I am not a port maintainer and never was. Apparently this was sent to a mailing list: To:

Re: i386 emacs run-time dependency on gcc?

On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 01:41:10PM -0500, James R. Van Artsdalen wrote: I realize emacs needs to be built with gcc on i386, but should there be a run-time dependency too? The emacs package tarball requires gcc to install. Things built with ports gcc often have dependencies on libraries that

Re: Mysterious patches

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 09:11:21PM +0100, A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven wrote: Having a look at graphics/libgfx (I'm using that port but it's currently unmaintained so I might feel like taking maintainership), I noticed that there are two patches in /usr/ports/graphics/libgfx/files/ *BUT* I can't for

Re: Mysterious patches

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 09:47:54PM +0100, A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven wrote: Henry Hu wrote: They apply to src/raster-png.cxx and src/raster.cxx Note to self: look inside the actual patch files themselves, it says right there which files they apply to *oops*. However, this does leave me

Re: CLang flags query:: I'm wanting to port software to FreeBSD

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 06:43:38PM -0500, Joe Nosay wrote: I've noticed different flags such as -Wno-parentheses and such along with the -Wno-unused-variable. I would like to know where would be a good source online to find the flags; and, I would like to know what flags are used by porters to

Re: Integrating Custom Ports

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:03:46PM -0500, Rick Miller wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Kris Moore k...@pcbsd.org wrote: On 12/10/2013 09:37, Rick Miller wrote: This is my first foray into Ports beyond just installing what is available. So, just looking for some feedback

Re: devel/llvm33 Makefile

I've committed a fix. If you don't need the extra asserts you probably want to turn them off as they slow things down and break serveral llvm consumers. -- Brooks On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:15:16PM +, Cary wrote: Hello, On 9.2-RELEASE llvm33-3.3_7 installation failed here: install

Re: llvm33 update

On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 05:57:02AM -0400, Ajtim wrote: Hi! I tried to update llvm33-3.3_4 to llvm33-3.3_5 on FreeBSD 10.0-BETA1 but I got an error: Compressing man pages === Installing ldconfig configuration file === Installing for llvm33-3.3_5 === Checking if devel/llvm33

Re: CLANG 3.3/LLVM 3.3 question regarding devel/llvm vs. devel/llvm33

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 09:32:36AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: No is 9.1-STABLE en route also equipted with CLANG 3.3, as it is with CURRENT. The ports system still differs between the standard devel/llvm, which is in fact LLVM 3.2 and devel/llvm33, which is then LLVM 3.3. devel/llvm

dropping maintainership of some ports

Due to a change of jobs I'm planning to drop maintainership of a number of ports I no longer use or have test systems for. If you would like to maintain them, please let me know: databases/nagios-check_postgres_replication net/openmpi net/pypvm net/vncreflector www/trac-addcomment

Re: llvm-3.2 tarball rerolled?

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:26:40AM +0100, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: On 2013-01-13 16:00, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2013-01-12 22:54, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: I'm seeing this size mismatch, any idea what it is about? root(itetcu)@it/SU -SSH- /usr/ports/devel/llvm [23:50:47] 0 # make ===

Re: Dropbox on FreeBSD

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:07:05AM -0500, Jerry wrote: On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:45:13 + Chris Rees articulated: It needs porting to kevent. Someone may do it for payment, some may do it for fun, but no-one will do it for you until you learn some manners. Or you could do it

Re: something had broken in *.mk?

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:52:05PM +0200, John Marino wrote: On 10/17/2012 14:30, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: I don't know much about this, I just know that current is going to use bmake, and the only incompatibility I have spotted so far from our make to bmake is the :L becoming :tl

Re: www/libxul: fails to compile with CLANG and fails to install with GCC

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 03:50:45PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: I already filed a PR (ports/171566) regarding the CLANG compilation issue, but since CLANG is a troublemaker for several ports, I also used USE_GCC=4.6 to compile the port www/libxul and this works - but fails then installing with

Re: Can we please just remove the old Makefile headers?

On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 02:02:47PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: The old Makefile headers, ala: # New ports collection makefile for:BIND 9.9.x # Date created: 27 January 2012 # Whom: dougb # # $FreeBSD: head/dns/bind99/Makefile 301487

Re: port unmaintained since 2005? drop it? misc/gpt*

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 01:45:40AM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote: On 6/11/12 4:31 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: Dunno what (if anything) they are currently good for, but it seems that, at a minimum, the PORTVERSION and/or MASTER_SITES -- and the pkg-descr -- need to be updated.

Re: Creation of users in ports

On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 07:54:07PM +, Chris Rees wrote: Hi all, I'm at a loss as to how to restore functionality for creating (or using) customised users in ports. For example, using the old method (pkg-install scripts) many ports allowed the user to change the username used for the

Re: Plan to add a bsd.pure.mk

On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:28:33AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: I would like to hold off on any more disruptive changes to the tree until we can get this release out the door. If that means devel/clang needs to stay at its current value (and only clang-devel updated), then that's fine. We

Re: sysutils/sge6[012]: Sun Grid Engine - still broklen due to utmpx?

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:04:49AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: I was wondering if the SUN Grid Engine, located in port sysutils/sge6[012] is still broken due to utmpx. My department uses this GRID engine on Linux and since a long time I wish to use it also on FreeBSD. I've not had a decent

Re: sysutils/sge6[012]: Sun Grid Engine - still broklen due to utmpx?

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:58:33AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:04:49AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: I was wondering if the SUN Grid Engine, located in port sysutils/sge6[012] is still broken due to utmpx. My department uses this GRID engine on Linux and since

Re: [CFT] Likewise-open preliminary port

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:09:23AM +0200, Ganael Laplanche wrote: Hi everyone, Over the past few weeks, I've been working on a Likewise-open [1] port and am starting to get something useable. Technically speaking, the port builds fine on x86 and amd64 platforms (gcc- only ATM) and is

Re: Lightspark port and LLVM bug

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:52:10AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:58:30AM -0500, Rusty Nejdl wrote: I might be interested in taking over maintainership of this port but at present, this will not compile. I have submitted a PR for an updated version of libxml++26

Re: build failure of ganglia-monitor-core-3.1.7

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:33:10PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:46:42AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:14:54PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 02:37:42AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10

Re: build failure of ganglia-monitor-core-3.1.7

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:19:40AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: On ia64 and sparc64, both current, I get a build failure of ganglia-monitor-core-3.1.7 when updating from 3.1.1_6: === Building for ganglia-monitor-core-3.1.7 make: cannot open Makefile. *** Error code 1 Stop in

Re: build failure of ganglia-monitor-core-3.1.7

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:14:54PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 02:37:42AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:19:40AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: On ia64 and sparc64, both current, I get a build failure of ganglia-monitor-core-3.1.7

Re: FreeBSD Port: squeezeboxserver-7.5.3, build okay but fails to start.

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 07:15:07AM -0700, spotter wrote: I am having the exact same problem with a brand new FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE install and a fresh squeezeboxserver (v7.5.3) port build. (Slimserver was working fine under FreeBSD 6.2, until I tried to get miniDLNA working, as well, for a

Re: Proposal moving *spell dicts to ports/textproc/*spell/dicts

On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 03:16:05PM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote: Hello, As I said some weeks ago I personally don't like much the use of ports/{french,chinese,whatever}/ directories. I saw that openbsd created sub directories in the aspell port. I think this is a really good

Re: update of security/pssh

On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 12:24:27PM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote: Hello, According to : http://www.theether.org/pssh/ parallel-ssh (pssh) is now maintained on http://code.google.com/p/parallel-ssh/ by Andrew McNabb. Current version is 2.1.1. Would you have time to look into a

Re: audio/squeezeboxserver still broken

On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 12:45:49PM -0700, George Hartzell wrote: Emanuel Haupt writes: George Hartzell hartz...@alerce.com wrote: Emanuel Haupt writes: Hi The current audio/squeezeboxserver port is still broken for me. I just built a package set with an up to date

Re: [RFC] Tools/ script for automatically making a tar out of svn sources

On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 10:27:58PM +0200, Eitan Adler wrote: The attached script is designed to work with the 20+ ports that currently have to resort to hacks to automatically figure out the head version, checkout from svn, make a tar file, and then upload the file to freefall. It is based

Re: squeezecenter 7.3.2 no longer starts with latest ports

On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 12:24:55AM +, Mark Knight wrote: In message 91b92520912021328j34373653r838ba135a41f5...@mail.gmail.com, Sandra Kachelmann s.kachelm...@googlemail.com writes I even removed the whole database and performed a complete rebuild: $ portupgrade -rf squeezeboxserver

Re: RFC: svn for make fetch

On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 07:07:25PM +, Marcin Wisnicki wrote: On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:31:57 +0200, Eitan Adler wrote: I was hoping to get a bit more of a response to a recent posting of mine with regard to using svn to fetch files for ports My proposal:

Re: RFC: svn for make fetch

On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 02:28:52PM -0800, Xin LI wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eitan Adler wrote: I was hoping to get a bit more of a response to a recent posting of mine with regard to using svn to fetch files for ports My proposal:

Re: using svn to fetch for ports (yet again!)

On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 08:23:02PM +0200, Eitan Adler wrote: I have a small patch to bsd.port.mk which would allow a port to replace its do-fetch with a svn export of a /specific revision/ of a remote repo. I know there have been some attempts at trying this before and from what I've been

Re: Installing in cgi-bin

On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 01:33:15PM -0400, Jerry wrote: I have a Perl program that I am thinking of porting to FreeBSD. The program has to be installed in the 'cgi-bin'. I was thinking something like: $(WWWDIR}/apache${APACHE_VERSION}/cgi-bin might be the way to direct the install to the

Re: Installing in cgi-bin

On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 04:07:30PM -0400, Jerry wrote: On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:43:13 -0500 Brooks Davis bro...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 01:33:15PM -0400, Jerry wrote: I have a Perl program that I am thinking of porting to FreeBSD. The program has to be installed

Re: FreeBSD Port: pssh-1.3.1_1

Sorry for not getting to this sooner. I've finaly updated the port. -- Brooks On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 04:49:47PM +0300, Michael wrote: Hi, Brooks. Upgrade pssh-1.3.1_1 to the pssh-1.4.3 plz. pslurp doesn't work: pslurp -L ~/ -r /tmp/1 1 [1] 16:34:24 [FAILURE]

Re: wildcards in pkg-plist?

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 02:26:07AM +, Sevan / Venture37 wrote: Hello again OpenNMS generates a bunch of cache files which have dynamically generated filenames (everytime a build is attempted the filenames change), how does one address this in the pkg-plist, I tried using *.cache.html

Re: A place to upload distfiles?

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:58:28AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I maintain a port for which the vendor provided me a customized distfile. They don't have it available for download from their site, so I need to find a home for it. Does the FreeBSD Project or Foundation provide hosting

Re: Making ports from source with weird download restrictions

On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 10:03:22AM -0700, Steve Franks wrote: Hi, There are two embedded software tools I've been wanting to port for some time. Both have inconsistent/funky downloads, so I have no idea how to get them into a port. Both are very active projects, and used by pretty much

Re: octave-forge

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:29:48PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Dear Maho, I see that octave-forge has been broken for quite a while. Do you mind if I have a go at redoing it? I presume that you would want to do it meta-port style, that is, lots of ports with names like

Re: FreeBSD Port: squeezecenter-7.0.1_4

On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 10:59:06PM +0200, Kenny Lasse Hoff Levinsen wrote: Hi! I'm sorry to bother, but i just wanted to ask when this port is gonna be updated (it's 7.1 now)? Know it's a simple app and i can just install it from sources (which is perl, to make it even simpler), but i

Re: audio/squeezecenter: .tgz not on Freebsd.org (is on slimdevices.com); perl probs

On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 10:05:31PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 05:46:59PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 09:19:35PM +0100, Rob MacGregor wrote: Chris Shenton unleashed the infinite monkeys on 13/06/2008 19:50 producing: The port tries to find

Re: audio/squeezecenter: .tgz not on Freebsd.org (is on slimdevices.com); perl probs

On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 05:46:59PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 09:19:35PM +0100, Rob MacGregor wrote: Chris Shenton unleashed the infinite monkeys on 13/06/2008 19:50 producing: The port tries to find the .tgz on FreeBSD.org only, but it does not exist. I found

Re: audio/squeezecenter: .tgz not on Freebsd.org (is on slimdevices.com); perl probs

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 02:50:51PM -0400, Chris Shenton wrote: The port tries to find the .tgz on FreeBSD.org only, but it does not exist. I found it on slimdevices -- same MD5, SHA256, SIZE: http://www.slimdevices.com/downloads/SqueezeCenter_v7.0.0/squeezecenter-7.0-noCPAN.tgz There's

Re: hier 7 question

On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 08:20:03PM -0400, Marc Spitzer wrote: Hello, I am porting ATF, http://www.netbsd.org/~jmmv/atf/, a unit testing framework for C, C++ and Shell. The thing is is that it installs a bunch of self tests in ${PREFIX}/tests/atf. Is this the right place for it? From

Re: porting of SVN-only software

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 09:08:25PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: Wesley Shields escribi?: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 09:54:09PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: Suppose there is a project that does not produce any official snapshots or releases of its source-code, keeps all sources in SVN and the

  1   2   >