Re: Fresh Ports: citrix_ica Citrix(R) Presentation Server(TM) client

On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:51:05 +0100, Emanuel Haupt stated: >Hi Michael > >Michael Hooten wrote: >> https://www.freshports.org/net/citrix_ica/ >> >> Has anyone gotten Citrix completely working on FreeBSD 12.2? I can >> connect without a problem. However, I have no sound. Where can I look >> for

Re: Sudden trouble with net/rdesktop

On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 13:13:57 +0300, abi via freebsd-ports stated: >I have the same problem, however I'm sure that nothing has changed on >remote side (Windows Update is completely disabled). I updated my >FreeBSD workstation though to 12.2 and all ports. Exactly what goal do you intend to

Re: www/joomla3 is no longer in the FreeBSD pkg repo

On Sun, 04 Oct 2020 01:10:42 -0500, Greg Rivers via freebsd-ports stated: >According to the poudriere build cluster >(), joomla3 is being skipped for >reason "php74-pecl-pdflib-4.1.4_1". Can the problem be corrected? I have not used Joomla in awhile. I found it

[phpLDAPadmin] Fatal error: Uncaught Exception: Serialization of 'Closure'

FreeBSD 11.4-RELEASE-p4 php74 I have been have a problem with 'phpLDAPadmin'. It has become impossible to use. I requested help, and was given this URL: https://github.com/leenooks/phpLDAPadmin/issues/103 According to this site, this bug has been squashed.

Re: Availability of samba 4.12.x

On Sat, 19 Sep 2020 16:11:50 +0200, Kurt Jaeger stated: >Hi! > >> I was just wondering why the current stable version of samba -- samba >> 4.12.7 is not available in the post tree? > >Because the maintainer did not yet got the time to create a port. You know that for a fact, or is that simply a

Availability of samba 4.12.x

I was just wondering why the current stable version of samba -- samba 4.12.7 is not available in the post tree? -- Carmel pgpiWwsjtZK9p.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: portsnap depreciation

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:44:27 -0700, John Kennedy stated: >On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 08:17:35PM +, Pau Amma wrote: >> On 2020-09-18 17:58, Carmel NY wrote: >> > On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:43:48 +, Pau Amma stated: >> >> See >> >> https://www.fre

Re: portsnap depreciation

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:43:48 +, Pau Amma stated: >On 2020-09-18 11:14, Carmel NY wrote: >> Is 'portsnap' >> going to be depreciated? > >Yes. > >> If so, when? > >I believe when 13.0 is released, or already if you're using a recent >-

portsnap depreciation

Perhaps I am wrong on this, so I thought I would ask. Is 'portsnap' going to be depreciated? If so, when? If is is depreciated, how will this affect poudriere? I thought that poudriere used 'portsnap'. -- Carmel pgpu4e_OrLlmR.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: net/qt5-network

On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 15:44:21 +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder stated: >## Carmel NY (carmel...@outlook.com): > >> The entire build log, what there is of it, is available here: >> https://seibercom.net/logs/qt5-network_build.log > >And there's your problem: >:

Re: net/qt5-network

On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 16:30:52 +0400, Gleb Popov stated: >On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 4:28 PM Carmel NY wrote: > >> >On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 at 13:10, Carmel NY >> >wrote: >> >> >> >> FreeBSD 11.4-RELEASE >> >> >> >> With a fre

Re: net/qt5-network

>On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 at 13:10, Carmel NY wrote: >> >> FreeBSD 11.4-RELEASE >> >> With a freshly updated ports tree, when I attempt to run poudriere to >> update the installed ports, I am greeted with this warning: >> >> [00:00:21] Ignoring ne

net/qt5-network

FreeBSD 11.4-RELEASE With a freshly updated ports tree, when I attempt to run poudriere to update the installed ports, I am greeted with this warning: [00:00:21] Ignoring net/qt5-network | qt5-network-5.15.0: is marked as broken: Qt5 requires Openssl 1.1.1, upgrade to FreeBSD 12.x/13.x or add

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245939

Would it be possible for some committer to look at the following PR: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245939 It has been hanging around for over a month. Until it is committed, any serious work on updating and reorganizing 'claws-mail' is effectively halted. Thanks! -- Carmel

Mailman 3

I was just wondering if there is a specific reason that Mailman 3 is not in the ports system. The latest update, Mailman 3.3.1 (Tom Sawyer) was released on April 19, 2020. -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Getting dovecot to use the openssl from ports

On Fri, 29 May 2020 11:38:44 +0200, Willem Jan Withagen stated: >Right that helped > >root@test:/tmp/usr/local/lib/dovecot # ldd ./libdovecot-login.so.0.0.0 >./libdovecot-login.so.0.0.0: >     libdovecot.so.0 => not found (0) >     libssl.so.11 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.11

Re: Getting dovecot to use the openssl from ports

On Thu, 28 May 2020 23:36:46 +0200, Willem Jan Withagen stated: >On 28-5-2020 16:53, Carmel NY wrote: >> On Thu, 28 May 2020 16:25:20 +0200, Willem Jan Withagen stated: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm trying to get dovecot to use the openssl from ports in >>>

Re: Getting dovecot to use the openssl from ports

On Thu, 28 May 2020 16:25:20 +0200, Willem Jan Withagen stated: >Hi, > >I'm trying to get dovecot to use the openssl from ports in >/usr/local/lib. But whatever I try, en en op with cryptostuff from >/usr/lib > >I think the correct way is to set >etc/make.conf >    

Re: smartmontools and update-smart-drivedb

On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:00:35 -0400, Dan McGrath stated: >Hi, > >On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:20 AM Bob Eager wrote: > >> The port doesn't get updated every time there is a new drive >> database; that would be unworkable. >> > >Just a thought, but perhaps something similar to what ntp does with: >

Re: smartmontools and update-smart-drivedb

On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 13:52:04 +0100, Bob Eager stated: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA256 > >On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:30:31 -0400 >Carmel NY wrote: > >> FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p8 >> >> Output of smartctl -V >> >> smartctl 7.1 2019-12

smartmontools and update-smart-drivedb

FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p8 Output of smartctl -V smartctl 7.1 2019-12-30 r5022 [FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE-p7 amd64] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-19, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org smartctl comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This is free software, and you are welcome to

Build with "DEBUG" symbols

Hypothetically, suppose I wanted to build my entire ports system with "debug" symbols; would putting: WITH_DEBUG_PORTS=* in the "make.conf" file work? Asking for a friend. -- Carmel pgp8Qwk11g7Dn.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Re: Re: exFAT is no longer encumbered

On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 11:59:09 -0800, Russell Haley stated: >On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 3:41 AM Carmel NY >wrote: > >> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:51:41 -0700, Adam Weinberger stated: >> >On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 6:38 PM Kevin P. Neal >> >wrote: >> >> &

Re: Re: exFAT is no longer encumbered

On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:51:41 -0700, Adam Weinberger stated: >On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 6:38 PM Kevin P. Neal >wrote: >> >> On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 01:01:52AM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote: >> > As of last August, Microsoft have relaxed the patent restrictions >> > on exFAT[1]. >> > >> > Can the

"devel/kio-extras" with samba v4-10

I have Samba Version 4.10.10 installed. When attempting to build devel/kio-extras with the: SAMBA=on: Needed to build the SMB kioslave which is the default setting in the port, the build fails with the message that the wrong version of 'samba' is installed. Version 4.8 of samba is already EOL'd

"math/openblas" will not build under poudriere

Attempting to build "math/openblas" using poudriere results in this error message: Ignoring: has to be built manually: Optimizes for the build machine. I can build it manually, however. Is this a bug or a design feature? The complete log of the failed poudriere build follows. build started at

Updating Samba

The latest stable release of Samba is "4.11.2". The newest port version is "4.10.10". Are there plans to update Samba to the latest stable release or is there a specific reason that it cannot be done at this time? -- Carmel ___

Web Service Discovery host daemon

I am considering installing "wsdd" . I have not been able to find a port for it. I just want to confirm that there isn't a port available for this program before I go about installing it from source. Thanks! -- Carmel

Re: Status of samba ports

On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 08:55:00 -0400, Robert Huff stated: >Andrea Venturoli writes: > >> Sorry for being pedantic, but I believe a lot of us would benefit >> from some guidance: >> _ should we upgrade promptly to 4.10? Will it work or will it be a >> waste of time? >> _ should we stay on 4.8,

Re: PHP version retirement

On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 10:17:44 +0200, Martin Waschbüsch stated: >Hi all, > >At least the last two versions of PHP, 5.6 & 7.0, were removed from >ports as soon as (or even shortly before) they were no longer actively >maintained upstream. I am unsure what the exact reasoning behind this >was, but I

Possible Patch

Is it possible for some committer to look at this. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=205971=edit ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Switching to openssl111

FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE-p6 GENERIC amd64 openssl version: OpenSSL 1.0.2s 28 May 2019 I want to use openssl111 so I can take advantage of 'tls 1.3' with postfix and apache24. I am trying to determine the correct procedure to use. I am using poudriere to build my packages and then install them. 1)

Updating Samba

The 20190619 entry in "UPDATING" recommends certain actions for updating Samba4[6-8] utilizing either 'portmaster' or 'portupgrade'. Are there4 any special actions that have to be taken if utilizing 'poudriere'? Thanks! -- Carmel NY ___ fre

Re: ports/lang major version updates outside of OS version updates

On Sat, 13 Apr 2019 07:35:25 -0700 (PDT), Roger Marquis stated: >>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 11:18:50PM +0200, Dima Pasechnik wrote: So there is more "software bureaucracy" here than just applying one patch. > >You sure about that Dima? Whether one or several the patching doesn't

Updating Postfix

Both Postfix 3.4 stable release and Postfix 3.5 experimental release were released over a month ago. In fact, the stable release is now at Postfix 3.4.4. The posts system still has postfix-3.3.3,1 as the stable release and Postfix-3.4.20181202,5 as the development release. I am just inquiring to

Re: Building qt5-gui port?

On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 06:40:01 -0800, Steve Kargl stated: >On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 08:31:12AM +0100, Tobias C. Berner wrote: >> Moin moin >> >> Make sure all your qt5-(qt5-gui dependency)-ports that are already >> installed are at 5.12.0. >> > >They are all up to date. > >% cd /usr/ports >% svn

Re: FreeBSD Port: fetchmail-6.3.26_9

On Mon, 07 Jan 2019 08:31:27 +0200, Oleg V. Nauman stated: >On Sunday, January 6, 2019 9:58:29 PM EET Alex V. Petrov wrote: >> New depence? >> >> checking for Kerberos V in /usr/local... found >> checking for krb5_des_string_to_key in -lcrypto... no >> checking for krb5_des_string_to_key in

Re: security/clamav-milter fails to compile (preliminary patch included)

On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:23:39 +0100, Michael Grimm stated: >Carmel NY wrote: >> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 18:13:51 +0100, Michael Grimm stated: >>> Michael Grimm wrote: > >>>> I am using poudriere to build my ports. Within a poudriere jail used to >&

Re: security/clamav-milter fails to compile (preliminary patch included)

On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 18:13:51 +0100, Michael Grimm stated: >Michael Grimm wrote: > >> I am using poudriere to build my ports. Within a poudriere jail used to >> compile the clamav-libmilter port no libmilter.so can be found by >> configure (see error message above) unless you

Re: security/clamav-milter fails to compile (preliminary patch included)

On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 17:14:11 +0100, Michael Grimm stated: >Hi, > >after upgrading from STABLE-11 to STABLE-12 security/clamav-milter failed to >compile: > > configure: error: Cannot find libmilter > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > Please report the problem to

Building devel/llvm60 on FreeBSD 12.0

Has anyone, besides me of course, had a problem building "devel/llvm60" after updating to FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE? My build, using poudriere, keeps ending with this error message: c++: error: unable to execute command: Killed c++: error: clang frontend command failed due to signal (use -v to see

Re: Updating poudriere jail

On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:29:18 +1100, andrew clarke stated: >On Thu 2018-12-13 19:43:30 UTC+0000, Carmel NY (carmel...@outlook.com) wrote: > >> I am using FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p6. If I use freebsd-update to install the >> new version 12, what do I have to do to update the po

Updating perl

Using poudriere, I attempted to update my system to the new "perl 5.28". I made the necessary changes in the "make.conf" files and then attempted to run poudriere. At the very beginning of the run, poudriere issued a warning that "security/py-certbot | py36-certbot-0.29.1_1,1" failed. This is from

Re: Updating poudriere jail

On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 12:49:07 -0700, Adam Weinberger stated: >On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 12:43 PM Carmel NY wrote: >> >> I am using FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p6. If I use freebsd-update to install the >> new version 12, what do I have to do to update the poudriere jail? Plus, >

Updating poudriere jail

I am using FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p6. If I use freebsd-update to install the new version 12, what do I have to do to update the poudriere jail? Plus, if I do update, will I have to rebuild all of my installed applications? Thanks :) -- Carmel ___

Updating "mysql80-server" port

My daily security run summary includes the following: Checking for packages with security vulnerabilities: Database fetched: Sun Dec 9 03:18:49 EST 2018 mysql80-server-8.0.12_2 This has been included in the report for quite some time now. After doing some quick checking, I find that MySQL

Re: mail/dovecot sodium not enabled

On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 08:47:41 -0700, Adam Weinberger stated: >On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 4:44 AM Larry Rosenman wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 10:51:16AM +, Carmel NY wrote: >> > On Tue, 04 Dec 2018 10:00:56 +0100, Matthias Fechner stated: >> >

Re: mail/dovecot sodium not enabled

On Tue, 04 Dec 2018 10:00:56 +0100, Matthias Fechner stated: >Hi, > >I just saw that sodium is explicitely disabled: >CONFIGURE_ARGS= --localstatedir=/var \ > --with-statedir=/var/db/dovecot \ > --without-shadow \ > --without-sodium \ > >by

dovecot-libsodium-plugin

I notice that there is no port for the "dovecot-libsodium-plugin"; "https://github.com/LuckyFellow/dovecot-libsodium-plugin/;. I was wondering if anyone had an interest in creating one? -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: orphaned: www/suphp

On Sat, 20 Oct 2018 19:31:52 +0100, Matthew Seaman stated: >On 20/10/2018 16:28, Lorenzo Salvadore via freebsd-ports wrote: >>> I just updated my ports tree and then proceeded to run: "pkg version -vL=" >>> which produced this: >>> >>> suphp-0.7.2_2 ? orphaned: www/suphp >>> >>> There is nothing

orphaned: www/suphp

I just updated my ports tree and then proceeded to run: "pkg version -vL=" which produced this: suphp-0.7.2_2 ? orphaned: www/suphp There is nothing about this in either the UPDATING or MOVED files. Has this port actually been removed and if so, why? -- Carmel

Moving to php-7.2 default

Unless I am mistaken, the default version of PHP in FreeBSD is "version 7.1". According to the PHP page, the 7.1 version was released on December 1, 2016, Its EOL is scheduled for December 1, 2018 (this year) and security support ends on December 1, 2019. Wouldn't it be a wise decision to up the

poudriere and forcing depends

I have come across several ports that poudriere builds with the wrong dependencies. I have MySQL 8.0 installed by poudriere. I wanted to install "databases/mysqlbackup" When built using the system "make install" command, it works fine. However, when I attempt to build it with poudriere, poudriere

Re: Of Git and M$

On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 20:37:39 +0200, Wojciech Puchar stated: >On Sat, 16 Jun 2018, Dave Horsfall wrote: > >> A related discussion reminded me of this: how would Microsoft's purchase >> of GitHub affect future development? After all, they'll get to call the >> shots...[*] The only good thing

Re: Visual Studio Code on FreeBSD / port request

On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 20:05:21 +0200, Miroslav Lachman stated: >Carmel NY wrote on 2018/06/04 17:41: >> On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:51:31 +0200, Miroslav Lachman stated: >> >>> Does somebody successfully run Visual Studio Code on FreeBSD? >>> https://github.com/Micro

Re: Visual Studio Code on FreeBSD / port request

On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:51:31 +0200, Miroslav Lachman stated: >Does somebody successfully run Visual Studio Code on FreeBSD? >https://github.com/Microsoft/vscode >I know my friends are running it on Ubuntu but I didn't found any >references how to run it on FreeBSD desktop. > >Miroslav Lachman

RE: lang/gcc6-aux fails to build

> On Monday, May 28, 2018 4:07 PM, Jonathan Chen wrote: > > Hi, > > Currently, lang/gcc6-aux is failing to build at r471064 with: > > 1.irontree:gcc6-aux,8:05am# pwd > /usr/ports/lang/gcc6-aux > 1.irontree:gcc6-aux,8:05am# svnlite info > Path: . > Working Copy Root Path: /usr/ports > URL:

Re: portupgrade vs. portmaster

On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:33:48 +, Thomas Mueller stated: >from STefan Esser: > >> I used to be a portupgrade user, long ago (years before the introduction >> of the new package tools), but then mobed over to using portmaster. > >> When the package system (PKG-NG) war completely reworked, I

Re: Changing PHP default version from 5.6 to 7.2 timeframe?

On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 17:51:51 +0200, Matthias Fechner stated: >Am 19.04.2018 um 16:48 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: >> I'm not involved in the decision, but I've heard from problems >> with typo3 and php7.2. > >I saw similar problems with other products. >For me I will stick to php7.1 for at least one

Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports

On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 19:53:49 +0200, Stefan Esser stated: >Yes, but I put literally hundreds of hours of effort into >understanding portmaster (which is one monolythic 4000 line >shell script with global state that recursively invokes itself >to implement local state, with hundreds of instances

Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports

On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 09:57:07 -0700, Steve Kargl stated: >This discussion occurred with the introduction of FLAVORS, >which broken all ports management tools except poudriere. So, you have not tried "synth" and I assume poudriere. -- Carmel ___

Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports

On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 14:18:22 +0200, Stefan Esser stated: {truncated} >This is another case (after the implementation of FLAVOR support that does >not seem well-designed and causes lots of effort and inefficiencies in port >management tools like portmaster), which makes me consider giving up my

Re: phpLDAPadmin -- is it time to drop this from ports?

On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 10:32:54 +0200, Per olof Ljungmark stated: >On 04/05/18 15:30, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 05/04/2018 13:35, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: >>> >>> Quoting Matthew Seaman : >>> Dear all, I've maintained the net/phpldapadmin port for _many_

Re: "converters/php72-mbstring" build failure

On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 21:42:41 +1100, Kubilay Kocak stated: >On 19/03/2018 9:33 pm, Kubilay Kocak wrote: >> On 19/03/2018 9:22 pm, Carmel NY wrote: >>> FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-p8 >>> >>> I am attempting to update the "converters/php72-mbstring" port

"converters/php72-mbstring" build failure

FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-p8 I am attempting to update the "converters/php72-mbstring" port. The older version build fine. The newest version fails with this error message: /usr/local/include/oniguruma.h:673:8: note: forward declaration of 'struct php_mb_re_pattern_buffer' struct re_pattern_buffer;

Re: Deprecating Skype ports

On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 06:17:30 +0100, Johannes Jost Meixner stated: >Hi Rene, > >What do you think about deprecating Skype ports? > >As far as I'm aware, Microsoft does not allow them to connect anymore, >thus they have become useless to keep. > There are at least a couple of URLs dealing with

"security/py-certbot-apache" port

I just updated my system and installed the "security/py-certbot-apache" port using "synth". The installation went fine. The problem now is when I attempt to run "certbot" it fails. The error log is below. I was forced to remove the py-certbot-apache port in order to get certbot to work again.

Re: undefined symbol "php7_module" in libphp7.so?

On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 23:11:32 +0900, Yasuhiro KIMURA stated: >From: >Subject: Re: undefined symbol "php7_module" in libphp7.so? >Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 08:52:52 -0500 > >> Okay, I rebuilt apache24 and php72 from ports. I'm still getting >> the error. >> >> Would someone

Re: undefined symbol "php7_module" in libphp7.so?

On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 20:20:24 +0900, Yasuhiro KIMURA stated: Apache 2.4 and PHP 7.2 are running on my home server. ~ $ freebsd-version 11.1-RELEASE-p6 ~ $ pkg info -x 'php72|apache24' apache24-2.4.29 mod_php72-7.2.2 php72-7.2.2 php72-bcmath-7.2.2 php72-bz2-7.2.2 php72-calendar-7.2.2

Re: Error 8192 with phpldapadmin

On Wed, 7 Feb 2018 23:41:13 +, Matthew Seaman stated: >The phpldapadmin codebase has not seen significant work for some years >now. This is a symptom of that neglect -- the code has not been adapted >to upstream changes in php. At the moment despite being self-described >as an 'error', this

Error 8192 with phpldapadmin

Name : phpldapadmin Version: 1.2.3_7,1 Name : php72 Version: 7.2.2 Recently, "phpldapadmin" has started throwing an error message as shown below: Unrecognized error number: 8192: Function create_function() is deprecated How can I go about correcting this

Re: daily security run output and joomla3

On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 02:56:51 +0900, Yasuhiro KIMURA stated: >From: Carmel NY <carmel...@outlook.com> >Subject: Re: daily security run output and joomla3 >Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2018 17:38:10 + > >>>You can try "pkg check -r", see man pkg-check >

Re: daily security run output and joomla3

On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 17:51:16 +0100, Miroslav Lachman stated: >Carmel NY wrote on 2018/01/28 11:59: >> FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-p6 >> >> I have "www/joomla3" installed and working fine. Part of the configuration >> routine is the removal of the &qu

daily security run output and joomla3

FreeBSD-11.1-RELEASE-p6 I have "www/joomla3" installed and working fine. Part of the configuration routine is the removal of the "installation" directory in joomla3 when it is configured. This is done as a security feature and joomla3 advertises that it will not run if that directory is present.

Synth failing

Synth is failing with the following error message: # synth upgrade-system Builder mounts detected; attempting to remove them automatically ... Dismounting successful! Old work directories detected; attempting to remove them automatically ... Directory removal successful! Regenerating flavor

Re: Vote: making wayland=on default

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 09:20:20 +, Johannes Lundberg stated: >Hi > >I want to suggest that we enable wayland by default. In current state >having some parts of wayland in ports is basically useless the >end-users themselves re-build gtk30 and mesa-libs with wayland >enabled. > >libwayland-egl.so

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:35:55 +0100, Jos Chrispijn stated: >On 8-12-2017 17:58, Warren Block wrote: >> procmail is ancient, and has had known quality issues for much of the >> time.  Consider maildrop as a more powerful and more maintained >> replacement that is pretty easy to implement: >I

RE: The ports@ list is now subscriber-post only

On Monday, December 11, 2017 9:17 AM, Lowell Gilbert stated: > "Thomas Mueller" writes: > > > Why only the freebsd-ports mailing list and no others? > > > > Other FreeBSD mailing lists get spam, and I thought freebsd-questions was > the biggest target for spam. > > A fair

RE: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Sunday, December 10, 2017 4:18 PM, RW wrote: > On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 10:10:30 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > Strongly agree! Support ofr some basics like .forward is really a > > requirement. It is used for too many "normal" mail operations > > including private dropmail or procmail setups as

Availability of py-certbot-apache

I was wondering if anyone could tell me when the "py-certbot-apache" port might be available? The port's message indicates that it will be available in the "security/py-certbot-apache" port; however, it obviously isn't. -- Carmel pgpC5XCqi8lD9.pgp Description: PGP signature

RE: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On Sunday, December 3, 2017 3:46 PM, Chris H stated: > On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 11:53:58 + "FreeBSD Ports ML" > po...@freebsd.org> said > > On Saturday, December 2, 2017 5:40 AM, Stari Karp stated: > > > On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 01:12 +, Ben Woods wrote: > > > > Hi Carmel, > > > > > > > > My

RE: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On Saturday, December 2, 2017 8:01 AM, Baho Utot stated: > On 12/02/17 07:23, Charlie Li wrote: > > On 02/12/2017 06:53, Carmel NY wrote: > >> Well, I certainly have no intention of installing and then learning > >> how to use an industrial sized solution line

RE: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On Saturday, December 2, 2017 5:40 AM, Stari Karp stated: > On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 01:12 +, Ben Woods wrote: > > Hi Carmel, > > > > My understanding is that poudriere is the only package building system > > that is officially supported by the portmgr, apart from raw make. > > > > There are many

RE: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

> First, welcome flavors. It has been badly needed for a while and is going to > clean up a couple of messes that have been plaguing the port system for a > long time. > > Second, whither port msanagement tools? At least portmaster now appears > dead. Any reason to expect it to be workable again?

Re: Package database problems

On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 13:37:02 -0600, Paul Schmehl stated: >Is there a way to force a port install regardless of conflicts? This is untried. Using synth, you could create a file with a listing of all your installed ports, then run: synth force "your file" That should correct the problem. That

Multiple www/drupal8 installations

I have a question regarding “www/drupal8” and configuring for multiple sites. From what I have read, it seems that there are quite a few users who feel it is neither safe nor advisable to do it the way the Drupal8 documentation says. I have another solution that I thought might be serviceable.

Re: FreeBSD Port: samba46-4.6.8

On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 01:58:33 +0200, Dutchman01 stated: >Hello timor, > > > >Would you please have a look and upgrade this port to 4.6.9 release please, > >it really has some nice bug fixes/patches. I believe it was only released Oct 25. I think we should allow the port maintainer a few days to

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 23:49:14 +0100, Matthew Seaman stated: >On 01/10/2017 11:34, Carmel NY wrote: >> 1. Does it determine out-of-date update packages automatically or does >> the user have to determine that what is out-of-date and feed them to >> poudriere manually an

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 10:51:39 +0100, Matthew Seaman stated: >On 30/09/2017 18:06, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> John did state that he would continue to support synth. I can't say if he >> has continued to make contributions. In any case, only poudriere is >> available for maintaining ports in HEAD and

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 10:06:17 -0700, Kevin Oberman stated: >On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 3:34 AM, Carmel NY <carmel...@outlook.com> wrote: > >> >> Excuse my ignorance, but why was John Marino exiled? >> >> >Not to state any opinion of my own, but John had h

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 09:27:40 +, Thomas Mueller stated: >from Chris H: > >> FWIW I loved portmaster, but quickly found that by choosing it, I was >> *instantly* at odds with a large majority of the FreeBSD crowd. >> Eventually, I experimented with other choices, and finally landed on >>

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:00:02 +, Thomas Mueller stated: >Excerpt from Jan Beich: > >> Why did portupgrade skip rebuilding print/harfbuzz-icu before building >> editors/libreoffice? The dependency trees of most desktop applications >> are so complex that the build falls apart if the upgrade

Re: Apache24 unable to find libphp5.so

On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:42:31 +0200, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator stated: >On 26-9-2017 15:31, Carmel NY wrote: >> I just did a clean installation of FreeBSD-11.1. I have gotten everything up >> and running except, I cannot find the "libphp5.so" modu

Apache24 unable to find libphp5.so

I just did a clean installation of FreeBSD-11.1. I have gotten everything up and running except, I cannot find the "libphp5.so" module. Apache24 complains that it is not present and quits. What port installs that module? I cannot seem to locate it. Thanks :) -- Carmel

Re: Help Wanted - Work with MSFT and help finish the port of .NET Core to FreeBSD

On Sun, 3 Sep 2017 19:15:13 -0700, Yuri stated: >On 09/03/17 17:54, Geoffrey Huntley wrote: >> Seehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHllisWOCpU and >> https://twitter.com/GeoffreyHuntley/status/904227946084294656 > > >Is there a body of software that requires .Net? I never came across >anything

Re: "clamav-unofficial-sigs" error message

On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 11:37:29 +0200, Marko Njezic stated: >On 2017-06-25 18:16, Carmel NY wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 17:17:44 +0200, Martin Waschbüsch stated: >> >>> From what I can see, the clamav-unofficial-sigs port works. It >>> determines if there are up

Re: "clamav-unofficial-sigs" error message

On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 17:17:44 +0200, Martin Waschbüsch stated: >From what I can see, the clamav-unofficial-sigs port works. It >determines if there are updates or whether you have checked recently, >so that you do not inadvertently dos the signature servers. What is >NOT working, apparently, is

"clamav-unofficial-sigs" error message

I recently installed clamav-unofficial-sigs via the ports system. The port version is quite old,v5.3.2, while the current version is v5.6.2. In any case, I am receiving the following error message repeatedly: Jun 24 15:45:00 ERROR: clamscan binary (clamscan_bin) not found This is the full log

Re: clamav-unofficial-sigs

On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 09:49:09 +0200, Kurt Jaeger stated: >Hi! > >> The port version of "clamav-unofficial-sigs" is 5.3.2; however a >> newer version 5.6.2 is available. The port version is quite old. Are >> there any plans to update the port? > >Have you tried to provide a patch ? It's structure

clamav-unofficial-sigs

The port version of "clamav-unofficial-sigs" is 5.3.2; however a newer version 5.6.2 is available. The port version is quite old. Are there any plans to update the port? -- Carmel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

  1   2   >