I thought "pkg updating" would alert me about python...?

I just re-verified the behavior, so -- even though I have already started taking evasive action (updating python), I figured it may be of use to show what I'm seeing; maybe I'm confused: Local ports tree is updated; previous ports update was a week ago. I happen to know that there's an UPDATING

Some success; some problems with x11/nvidia-driver-460.39_1

With the update of x11/nvidia-driver from 460.39 to 460.39_1, it now builds and works on a couple of laptops, running either stable/12 (stable/12-n232662-e8eded55f23) or stable/13 (stable/13-n244485-6136a10e355a). On those same laptops, however, I get panices running head (either

Re: Can't load nvidia.ko on stable/12 after r564088 (440.100_1 -> 460.36)

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 04:51:02AM -0800, John Kennedy wrote: > ... > > So I suspect that "link_elf_obj: symbol nvidia_driver_name undefined" > > whine is likely salient. > > I just opened up PR#253269 for the same symptom. Ah; cool -- thanks! Once I finish the morning's update cycle, I'll

Can't load nvidia.ko on stable/12 after r564088 (440.100_1 -> 460.36)

This is on both my current laptop (Dell Precision M4800) and a new(er) one (Dell Precision 7520); the current laptop's graphics card shows up as: vgapci0@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x03 card=0x05cc1028 chip=0x11fc10de rev=0xa1 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation' device =

Re: Pinentry

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:00:46AM -0700, @lbutlr wrote: > I ma trying to figure out why pin entry and pinetnry-tty are installed. If I > try to remove it, I get a list of post that are to be deleted. > > Installed packages to be REMOVED: > gnupg: 2.2.27 > gpgme: 1.15.1 >

Re: make index errors ports/head rev 556800

On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 02:41:17PM +, tech-lists wrote: > Hi, > > I'm getting these errors when make index runs on latest ports: > [...] > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ocaml-nox11-4.05.0_1 > Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: mc-nox11-4.8.24 > [...] > > Should I raise this in bugzilla? > >

Re: Might an UPDATING entry be appropriate for a MINIMAL_PKG_VERSION bump?

On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 08:31:05AM +0900, Tatsuki Makino wrote: > Hello. > > In my case, > -x \*-kmod-\[0-9gv\] is added to portmaster because all packages that > install kernel modules contain -kmod in their names. This excludes *-kmod. > And when they are upgraded, I won't be installing them

Might an UPDATING entry be appropriate for a MINIMAL_PKG_VERSION bump?

When I rebuild FreeBSD (stable/12) on my laptop, I also rebuild a ports module (x11/nvidia-driver), since the laptop has an Nvidia graphics card. However, a couple of times within the last few days, the kernel build has failed because I normally wait to update ports until after I have built and

r548950: graphics/mesa-libs vs. x11/nvidia-driver??!?

r548950 | manu | 2020-09-19 02:34:36 -0700 (Sat, 19 Sep 2020) | 9 lines mesa-libs: Add glesv1 lib There is no real reason to disable glesv1 so add it to the build. While here add a USE_GL for it. Reviewed by:zeising

Re: portsnap depreciation

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 01:58:29PM -0400, Carmel NY wrote: > ... > >https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/testing-poudriere.html#testing-poudriere-ports-tree > > > >and the next sections. > > According to the above page, "The most straightforward way is to have >

Re: the state of amd64 ports on -CURRENT as of 20200827

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 01:55:08PM +, Mark Linimon wrote: > The latest build of amd64-CURRENT ports has just completed: > > > http://beefy18.nyi.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=head-amd64-default=p546132_s364744 > > The number of build failures is now 740. This is an slight drop from >

Re: x11-wm/piewm: "ld: error: duplicate symbol: yylineno"

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:11:45AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > > Advice/suggestions? > > In this case, "svn rm x11-wm/piewm/files/patch-gram.y" will fix it > correctly. I have no idea why that patch was added in the first place, > it is clearly incorrect! > > -Dimitry > Thank you

x11-wm/piewm: "ld: error: duplicate symbol: yylineno"

On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 06:39:10PM +, pkg-fall...@freebsd.org wrote: > You are receiving this mail as a port that you maintain > is failing to build on the FreeBSD package build server. > Please investigate the failure and submit a PR to fix > build. > > Maintainer: da...@catwhisker.org >

Re: bugzilla messages about issues related to freebsd-ports, freebsd-multimedia, ...

On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 01:27:55PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > ... > There is nothing written about "... and for Cc issues from bugzilla". > > What I do not like and do not understand why this was introduced, that > the issue tracker bugzilla copies comments etc. in the issues to the >

Re: Can anyone build www/node right now?

On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 10:07:58PM +0200, DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator wrote: > I have tried to build www/node for weeks now, and it always fails. This is on > a fresh Poudriere jail, amd64, 12.1-REL-p6. Checking my logs, www/node is one of the packages built (via poudriere) this

Re: poudriere-devel failed to build lang/rust (rust-1.43.1)

On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 04:31:42PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote: > ... > According to the full log the reason is "(signal: 9, SIGKILL: kill)" and > the signal was sent to multiple processes. The kernel usually sends > SIGKILL on out-of-memory conditions. Oh! OK; thank you: I had failed to see that.

Re: poudriere-devel failed to build lang/rust (rust-1.43.1)

On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 03:56:09PM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > ... > load: 8.59 cmd: sh 99503 [piperd] 35609.83r 1.23u 1.88s 0% 2156k > [12amd64-ports-home] [2020-05-23_12h08m48s] [parallel_build:] Queued: 1003 > Built: 999 Failed: 1Skipped: 2Ignored: 0Tobuild: 1

poudriere-devel failed to build lang/rust (rust-1.43.1)

In my environment, I have a designated "build machine" (named "freebeast"); in addition to building FreeBSD for itself and a couple of other machines, it also builds packages (via devel/poudriere-devel) for those other machines. (Each machine is amd64, running stable/12.) The other machines get

Re: Bind 9.16 port error still lingers

On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 05:20:27PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > On 2020-05-02 17:16, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote: > > On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 04:32:10PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > >> ## The Doctor via freebsd-ports (freebsd-ports@freebsd.org): > >> > >>> Subject: Bind

Re: FreeBSD Port: firefox-73.0,1 error build

On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 03:49:39PM +0700, Alex V. Petrov wrote: > ... > In file included from > /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/dist/system_wrappers/exception:3: > > > /usr/include/c++/v1/exception:180:5: error: no member named 'abort' in > namespace 'std::__1'; did you mean simply 'abort'? >

Re: xterm-353

On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 10:36:00AM -0500, ajtiM via freebsd-ports wrote: > Update of xterm to version 253 has a problem: > > ===> License MIT accepted by the user > ===> xterm-353 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by xterm-353 for building > =>

Re: firefox, thunderbird crash on start

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 11:51:32AM -0700, Russell L. Carter wrote: > Hi folks, > On about a month old -stable amd64, recent, up-to-the minute > firefox and thunderbird are crashing on startup since yesterday, > like so: > > rcarter@feyerabend> firefox > > (firefox:5486): GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **:

Re: sqlite3 update to 3.31.0 breaks firefox and thunderbird

On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 06:35:01PM -0500, Michael Butler wrote: > Both produce core dumps related to sqlite :-( Rebuilding both doesn't > fix either. Downgrading to 3.30.1 restores normal operation, > Confirmed; thank you for the circumvention. Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill

Re: chromium-79.0.3945.130 fails to build.

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 09:58:17AM +1300, Jonathan Chen wrote: > Hi, > > The latest update of chromium-79.0.3945.130 is currently failing to > build on FreeBSD-12/amd64: > Please see https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243509 (which has a patch that allowed the build to

Re: How should follks migrate from linux_base-c6 to linux_base-c7?

On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 04:19:30PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > ... > > | compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.18 > > This was needed when the default value was 2.4., but nowadays > the default is already higher than 2.6.18 so you can just remove this. > Besides that it's just a matter of removing c6

How should follks migrate from linux_base-c6 to linux_base-c7?

As noted in , the -c6 ports "expire tomorrow." I don't see a documented process for migrating from linux_base-c6 to linux_base-c7; perhaps I'm being thicker than usual. For example, from prior migrations (e.g., the 20141209 entry

Re: [Circumvented] Problem updating gimp-app-2.10.12_2,1 to gimp-app-2.10.12_3,1

On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 01:34:50PM +0200, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > Try recompile graphics/libspiro. > Thanks. As noted, I did (along with graphics/gegl), and that appears to have circumvented the problem. I wrote the note so that others might make use of my experience: the issue is

[Circumvented] Problem updating gimp-app-2.10.12_2,1 to gimp-app-2.10.12_3,1

I update base FreeBSD and the installed ports on my laptop daily; usually, this works out quite well (which I think says something very positive about FreeBSD). This morning, the attempt to update graphics/gimp-app failed; I was able to get it to work by manually re-building and -installing

Re: devel/llvm80 build blocked by "graphics/py-imagesize@py27 | py27-imagesize-1.1.0: Failed: fetch"

On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 01:28:46PM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports wrote: > I'm unclear on why devel/llvm80 depends on graphics ports, but > after 'svnlite update -r507241 /usr/ports' (not having updated > in some time), my poudriere bulk run reported: > > [00:23:50] [26] [00:10:36]

Re: Cleaning up pkg-message

On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 12:11:57PM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I want to get some stakeholder input on our pkg-message files. I think > we need to have a clear policy about what does and doesn't belong in > them, and I'd like to get your input. > > pkg-message is shown to

Re: Is there a way to build only the port from source, and install dependencies from packages with the make command?

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 10:35:21AM -0700, Yuri wrote: > Sometimes instructions to build some port from source are needed. "cd > /usr/ports/{caregory}/{port-name} && make" rebuilds everything from > source, including dependencies. > > Is there an easy way to make it install missing dependencies

Re: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

[Recipient list trimmed -- dhw] On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 11:10:02AM +, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Here is an email from portscout I got today - is it sent in error, as > I have nothing to do with the port mentioned there (and I do not > maintain any ports), and it's not directed to me, but to the

Re: Resolving ports conflicts for ImageMagick6

On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 09:43:39AM -0800, bob prohaska wrote: > In trying to bring inkscape up to date on r340487 the process > is getting stuck with > > ===> Registering installation for ImageMagick6-6.9.10.14,1 as automatic > Installing ImageMagick6-6.9.10.14,1... > pkg-static:

Re: FreeBSD Port: firefox-63.0.1,1 multiple errors build

[Recipient list trimmed -- dhw] On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 08:54:16AM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote: > ... > > For reliable port builds, you need use port builders that use clean > > environments; ie poudriere or synth > > True, but we used to make ports build with a previous version installed, >

Silent failure of 'pkg upgrade'

Since July, 2015, I have been updating my "production" machines here at home on a weekly basis; for the ports/packages phase of this, I have been using poudriere (on a dedicated "build machine") to build packages for the production machines. Overall, this approach has been working quite well.

Re: x11/nvidia-driver no longer works under -current (r338323)

On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 09:12:05PM +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > ... > > It fails here: > > Hi John, > > It fails earlier, can you find and paste the 'error: ' line(s) ? > I expect the observed failure is related to the message Alan Cox sent yesterday: | Subject: Re: nvidia-driver build

Re: nvidia-driver build error (last ports, FreeBSD-HEAD)

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 04:41:42PM +0700, Alex V. Petrov wrote: > I also encountered this, but with x11/nvidia-driver-340. Some additional information: * I did not encounter the issue on stable/11 (as of r338124). * In head, I did not have a problem as recently as @r338094. * In head,

Re: After mutt-1.10.0_1 -> mutt-1.10.1 upgrade, gnupg fails

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 05:52:51AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > > A symptom is that an attempt to send a signed, unencrypted message > yields a failure, with the messages: > > | gpg: skipped "0x6757003D": Unusable secret key > | gpg: signing failed: Unusabl

After mutt-1.10.0_1 -> mutt-1.10.1 upgrade, gnupg fails

This is running: FreeBSD g1-215.catwhisker.org 11.2-STABLE FreeBSD 11.2-STABLE #685 r336523M/336541:1102501: Fri Jul 20 03:40:05 PDT 2018 r...@g1-215.catwhisker.org:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY amd64 and after updating all installed ports to reflect the ports "head" branch at

Re: unreliable pkg upgrade of pecl / pear packages after flavors

On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 01:59:50PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 10:14:06PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > UPDATING entry says it should be upgraded automatically but it was not. > > > > "People using Poudriere 3.2+ and binary packages do not have to do > > anything."

Re: Perl version change and ports/UPDATING

On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 04:23:54PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 7:25 AM, David Wolfskill <da...@catwhisker.org> > wrote: > ... > > But "pkg updating -i" fails to display the 20180330 entry for me; > > it does show entries for

Perl version change and ports/UPDATING

While the actual change to the Perl version works fine for me, I find that invoking "pkg updating" fails to display the 20180330 ports/UPDATING entry. I got lucky, because I found out about the change a different way. I maintain /usr/ports as an SVN working copy, using a local private mirror

Re: All those notes...

On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:39:56AM +1100, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > > > This was accompanied by zillions of notes, warning me to "do this" and > > "avoid doing that" etc. Err, were those notes squirreled away somewhere, > > or do I have to hope that I don't lose the window and its

A note on updating security/gnupg20 -> gnupg

I had been using security/gnupg20 with mail/mutt, based on a misunderstanding on my part (back when the security/gnupg20 port was created). Now that security/gnupg20 has been expired and removed, I had motivation to look into the situation in more detail; I found that security/gnupg (now at

Re: mail/mutt && security/gnupg (after gnupg20 -> gnupg) weirdness

I *think* the issue is that I needed to update ~/.muttrc for the change in gnupg; in particular: set pgp_decrypt_command="gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --passphrase-fd 0 --no-verbose --batch -o - %f" was changed to set pgp_decrypt_command="gpg2 %?p?--passphrase-fd 0 --pinentry-mode=loopback?

mail/mutt && security/gnupg (after gnupg20 -> gnupg) weirdness

I have been using mail/mutt & security/gnupg (latter switched to security/gnupg20 back when gnupg20 port was created because of a similar-looking issue to what's described in the first part of the below narrative) for several years -- without enabling "gpgme" (in case that turns out to be

Re: Working on FLAVOR support in portmaster

On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:35:55AM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote: > ... > I'm working on FLAVOR support in portmaster. My version did already build > all updated ports, the FLAVOR parameter is passed to build sub-processes, > but there is still some confusion between multiple flavored versions of the

Re: Spam on -ports

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:13:20AM +0200, Jan Bramkamp wrote: > ... > I would like to help fighting the spam problem on the FreeBSD.org > mailing lists. Can you put me in contact with the right people? > > -- Jan Bramkamp would be the appropriate email address -- both

graphics/netpbm update to netpbm-10.80.00

Empirical observation: environments that currently have an older installation of graphics/netpbm already installed, and where the intent is to update graphics/netpbm to netpbm-10.80.00 by building the port in the environment with the older netpbm already installed (e.g., make, portmaster, and

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 11:51:33AM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: > On 2 Oct, Marco Beishuizen wrote: > ... > > I'm running 11.1-STABLE now, upgrading every few months or when there is > > an important security fix. Do I have to build a new system twice in that > > case (once my running system and

Re: x11/nvidia-settings: poudriere fails; portmaster succeeds

On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 09:39:39AM -0700, Yuri wrote: > On 08/19/17 06:01, David Wolfskill wrote: > > In fairness, this may be an "apple vs. orange" comparison. But it's > > fairly unusual (in my experience) for poudriere to fail to build a port, > > but when it

x11/nvidia-settings: poudriere fails; portmaster succeeds

In fairness, this may be an "apple vs. orange" comparison. But it's fairly unusual (in my experience) for poudriere to fail to build a port, but when it's a port that I had just built successfully (using portmaster) on my laptop... well, I thought it was worth mentioning. The whine in the

Re: lang/rust: failure to build stage0 tool rust-installer (amd64)

On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 02:30:44PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote: > David Wolfskill <da...@catwhisker.org> writes: >> [whine about lang/rust failing to build...] > > See https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221088 > Thanks; given the hints there, I was able t

lang/rust: failure to build stage0 tool rust-installer (amd64)

This is on my laptop, running: FreeBSD g1-252.catwhisker.org 11.1-STABLE FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE #356 r322216M/322217:1101501: Tue Aug 8 03:44:01 PDT 2017 r...@g1-252.catwhisker.org:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY amd64 using a ports working copy updated from r447489 to r447536:

Re: devel/apr1: "make install" can't find apr_dbd_sqlite3-1.so

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 05:35:05AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > Ref. PR <https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220699> > Ports r445645 seems to have addressed the issue(s) successfully. Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill da...@ca

devel/apr1: "make install" can't find apr_dbd_sqlite3-1.so

Ref. PR Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org If the meeting was innocuous, why was its purpose mischaracterized? See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.

Re: math/R: Build failure after PORTREVISION for shlib change

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:39:50PM -0300, Joseph Mingrone wrote: > ... > With those options, the build succeeds in an 11.0-RELEASE-p1 jail. > http://pkg.awarnach.mathstat.dal.ca/data/11amd64-default/2017-06-28_16h53m48s/logs/R-3.4.0_2.log > ... > Everything matches. The successful build in

Re: math/R: Build failure after PORTREVISION for shlib change

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:39:50PM -0300, Joseph Mingrone wrote: > ... > Everything matches. The successful build in poudriere even has the same > line that generates the error for you. I may try ktracing the build > /usr/local/bin/gcc-ar5 -cr libtre.a regcomp.o regerror.o regexec.o

Re: math/R: Build failure after PORTREVISION for shlib change

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 04:36:18PM -0300, Joseph Mingrone wrote: > Hi David, > > So far I haven't been able to reproduce any problems in an > 11.0-RELEASE-p1 jail. Could you send your list of port options? If I > can't reproduce any issues with the same options turned on, I will ask > you for a

Re: Should a package restart on upgrade itself

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 06:29:24PM +0200, Matthias Fechner wrote: > Dear all, > > it is always a pain if pkg upgrade a lot of packages to restart all > services to make sure update/security fixes are applied to all running > services. > > Is there an option in pkg that it restart services

Re: The future of portmaster [and of ports-mgmt/synth]

On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 04:29:40PM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote: > ... > But I have a naive question: if pkg supports flavours, and binary > packages are built for your sets of options, is portmaster still > relevant? > Well, that depends... e.g., on one's set of requirements (and how they

Re: pango not building under portmaster, holds back emacs (portmaster)

On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 04:55:57PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > I suspect this is a portmaster problem, but pango isn't building with X > support because of: > ../pango/pangoxft-render.h:31:10: fatal error: 'X11/Xft/Xft.h' file not found > > This is only the current issue. I've been struggling

Re: graphics/mesa-libs ... issues

On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 10:20:41AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > In my Saturday poudriere run, I encountered a failure in > graphics/mesa-libs that I'm not understanding how to fix (or evade) > after updating the ports working copy to r440771: > > ... > [00:00:00] >>

Re: mesa libs issue

On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:14:33PM +, Tatsuki Makino wrote: > Hello. > Does anyone reading this know how to upgrade more easily from below? > What I would do: pkg delete -f libEGL-17.0.3 libGL-17.0.3 libglesv2-17.0.3 gbm-17.0.3 libglapi-17.0.3 dri-17.0.3,2 portmaster -d

Re: mesa libs issue

On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 05:54:10PM -0600, The Doctor wrote: > > ===> Installing for mesa-libs-17.0.4 > ===> Checking if mesa-libs already installed > ===> Registering installation for mesa-libs-17.0.4 as automatic > Installing mesa-libs-17.0.4... > pkg-static: mesa-libs-17.0.4 conflicts

graphics/mesa-libs ... issues

In my Saturday poudriere run, I encountered a failure in graphics/mesa-libs that I'm not understanding how to fix (or evade) after updating the ports working copy to r440771: ... [00:00:00] >> Creating the reference jail... done [00:00:06] >> Mounting system devices for 11amd64-ports-home

Re: svn error: node conflict in /usr/ports/x11/xcb-proto/files

On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 09:32:08AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote: > ... > > > FreeBSD amelia2 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #1 r286653M: Wed > > Aug 12 15:25:51 UTC 2015 > > > root@amelia2:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SANDY11NC-NDIS amd64 > > > You should really update world/kernel first and then

www/firefox, UPDATING, and "This platform lacks a functioning sem_open implementation..."

In case it helps someone else, I had encountered the symptoms cited in UPDATING entry 20170411, but the UPDATING entry didn't exist at the time. So I poked around, and discovered that -- in my case -- the thing that was apparently causing the problem was that lang/python27 had been built with

Re: pousdriere: "Failed ports: textproc/py-sphinx:build-depends"

On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 02:31:54PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > ... > > This morning, however, textproc/py-sphinx apparently had "an issue"; > > that snowballed into 211 (out of 402) ports being skipped. > > I've seen similar issues, here's what I did: > > There's some thing happening with the

pousdriere: "Failed ports: textproc/py-sphinx:build-depends"

Usually, my poudriere runs are ... uneventful (which is a Good Thing). This morning, however, textproc/py-sphinx apparently had "an issue"; that snowballed into 211 (out of 402) ports being skipped. Checking the log directory, I see no hints about textproc/py-sphinx; here's what I do see,

Re: Upgrade of libpthread-stubs-0.3_6 to libpthread-stubs-0.4 -- ??!?

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 03:51:35PM +0200, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > There is a PR > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218208 > OK; thanks. Now that I have a working X11 environment, I'll update that. What I did to fix the problem (as I use portmaster to update ports

Re: Upgrade of libpthread-stubs-0.3_6 to libpthread-stubs-0.4 -- ??!?

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 03:13:11PM +0200, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > /usr/ports/devel/libpthread-stubs/work/libpthread-stubs-0.4/README > > Project description > --- > > Currently the project provides only a pkg-config [.pc] file, > pthread-stubs.pc.The latter contains the

Upgrade of libpthread-stubs-0.3_6 to libpthread-stubs-0.4 -- ??!?

After performing the above upgrade (apparently "successfully"), I have no libpthread-stubs.so.0: From "pkg info --list-files devel/libpthread-stubs" on a system I have yet to update: libpthread-stubs-0.3_6: /usr/local/lib/libpthread-stubs.a /usr/local/lib/libpthread-stubs.so

Re: Procedural showstopper

On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 05:57:46AM -0700, The Doctor wrote: > portmaster -a > ... > ===>>> The devel/libc++ port has been deleted: Obsolete, all supported > FreeBSD versions have libc++ in the base system > ===>>> Aborting update > > Checked the UPDATING file , not method of procedure noted. >

Re: The future of portmaster

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:08:52PM +0100, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: > Hi all, > > portmaster, a tool used/loved/hated, is almost in abandoned state. > ... > So I decided to spend some time to look at it and to work on it. > Thank you! (I'll take a look at your work later; I'm in the middle

Re: Question on upgrading ports after 9.3->10.3

On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 02:05:26PM +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: > Me again :-) I finally got around to following the notes that David > Wolfskill kindly provided (thanks!) and apart from some oddity about > "httpd" requiring a missing "libdb-4.2.so.2" (which wil

Re: Daily update issue

On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 08:27:30AM -0700, The Doctor wrote: > ... > > * sudo pkg delete linux-c6-qt47-4.7.2_3 > > x11-themes/linux-c6-hicolor-icon-theme > > which removed the problem. > > > > No dice here. > > I just get blanks. > If you have it installed, but nothing depends on it, you

Re: Daily update issue

On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 07:54:43AM -0700, The Doctor wrote: > 1) > > > ===>>> Returning to update check of installed ports > > > ===>>> The x11-themes/linux-c7-hicolor-icon-theme port has been deleted: > Merged into linux_base port > ===>>> Aborting update > > How to fix What I did: * pkg

Re: Failure to build x11/nvidia-driver-340 kmod in head @r312812

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 04:52:34AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > ... > cc -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -DNV_VERSION_STRING=\"340.101\" > -D__KERNEL__ -DNVRM -Wno-unused-function -Wuninitialized -O2 > -fno-strict-aliasing -mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -UDEBUG -U_DEBU

Failure to build x11/nvidia-driver-340 kmod in head @r312812

This is running: FreeBSD g1-252.catwhisker.org 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #236 r312749M/312749:1200020: Wed Jan 25 04:42:36 PST 2017 r...@g1-252.catwhisker.org:/common/S4/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY amd64 after updating source to r312812, with ports (head) @432483. The issue arose

Re: devel/cargo build failure

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 06:33:29PM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Le 24/01/2017 à 16:52, Bob Willcox a écrit : > > When trying to build devel/cargo I get this error: > > > > /xports/Mk/Scripts/checksum.sh: cannot open > > 2016-11-02/cargo-nightly-x86_64-unknown-freebsd.tar.gz: No such file or >

Re: devel/cargo build failure

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:52:41AM -0600, Bob Willcox wrote: > When trying to build devel/cargo I get this error: > > /xports/Mk/Scripts/checksum.sh: cannot open > 2016-11-02/cargo-nightly-x86_64-unknown-freebsd.tar.gz: No such file or > directory > *** Error code 2 > > Stop. > make: stopped

Re: Correct order when upgrading to 11.0 Release with Poudriere

You could also (take backups at suitable points along the way and): * Install the misc/compat10x port. * Upgrade the base FreeBSD system (i.e., not ports) from 10.x to 11. Your ports SHOULD all still work at this point, because of the compat 10x libraries the compoat10x port installed. * As

"make install" appears to silently fail to install some files if $LOCALBASE is a symlink

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 01:32:47PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > ... > A correspondent pointed out > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214381 to me -- looks > as if this mode of failure may be "expected" when /usr/local is a > symlink to a file system

Re: devel/llvm38 install seems to be missing files (e.g., FileCheck)

On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 09:55:50AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > ... > > >> llvm38/bin/FileCheck is not actually installed? > > > > > > not sure, if I missed something in your postings. > > > > > > On my boxes, all recent FreeBSD 12.0-C

Re: best time to sync

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 09:36:36AM -0700, Gary Aitken wrote: > ... > ... > >> Can someone tell me what the best time to synchronize ports is, > >> in terms of having a consistent ports tree? > ... > I'm interested in a consistent ports tree for build purposes. I want > updates, but I want the

Re: devel/llvm38 install seems to be missing files (e.g., FileCheck)

On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 05:08:46PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 05 Nov 2016, at 16:58, Rainer Hurling wrote: > ... > >> Am I incorrect in thinking that devel/llvm38 has a problem, though, in > >> that "%%LIT%%llvm38/bin/FileCheck" is in that port's pkg-plist, and > >>

Re: devel/llvm38 install seems to be missing files (e.g., FileCheck)

On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 05:26:33AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > ... > I circumvented the problem: ... > > g1-252(11.0-S)[20] sudo cp -p !$ /usr/local/llvm38/bin/ > sudo cp -p work/stage/usr/local/llvm38/bin/FileCheck /usr/local/llvm38/bin/ > g1-252(11.0-S)[21] > > Th

Re: devel/llvm38 install seems to be missing files (e.g., FileCheck)

On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 05:50:07AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > After seeing that lang/rust failed to build again today (it had also > failed yesterday), I decided to actually check the typescript file (from > the portmaster run) to see if I could figure out what was wrong.

devel/llvm38 install seems to be missing files (e.g., FileCheck)

After seeing that lang/rust failed to build again today (it had also failed yesterday), I decided to actually check the typescript file (from the portmaster run) to see if I could figure out what was wrong. Here's a salient excerpt: | ... | ===> Cleaning for rust-1.12.1 | ===> License APACHE20

Re: Staging failure for freshly-built www/firefox-49.0_8,1

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 08:59:49AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > ... > > After copying eacho those, firefox starts, then errors out: > > > > On the other hand, with those in place, firefox-49.0_8,1 builds, stages, > and installs OK... though it doesn

Re: Staging failure for freshly-built www/firefox-49.0_8,1

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 08:05:55AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > ... > and thus, no longer installs /usr/local/lib/libplds4.so.1. > > I was able to find a copy of /usr/local/lib/libplds4.so.1 on a system that > I only update weekly (on Sundays). I copied it over... on

Re: Staging failure for freshly-built www/firefox-49.0_8,1

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 07:53:13AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > ... > % locate libplds4.so.1 > /usr/local/lib/libplds4.so.1 > % pkg which /usr/local/lib/libplds4.so.1 > /usr/local/lib/libplds4.so.1 was installed by package nspr-4.13 > Thanks. I tried (re-)installing devel/nspr, but it has

Re: Staging failure for freshly-built www/firefox-49.0_8,1

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 06:18:13AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > ... > So... apparently I'm lacking "libplds4.so.1"??!? > > > Clues welcomed > Well I now find that attempting to invoke firefox-49.0_7,1 -- the one I had installed before -- also

Staging failure for freshly-built www/firefox-49.0_8,1

This was observed on my laptop, freshly updated from: FreeBSD g1-252.catwhisker.org 10.3-STABLE FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE #493 r306880M/306902:1003508: Sun Oct 9 04:10:04 PDT 2016 r...@g1-252.catwhisker.org:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY amd64 to: FreeBSD g1-252.catwhisker.org 10.3-STABLE

"pkg upgrade" issue encountered & resolved: "Repository ... has a wrong packagesite, need to re-create database"

For my "production" machines at home, I build FreeBSD (from sources) and build packages (from ports) on a dedicated "build machine," then install onto the production machines, as described in . In preparation for the stable/10 -> stable/11

How to migrate from ports/emulators/linux_base-c6 to linux_base-c7?

Per ports/UPDATING entry 20141215, I have been using emulators/linux_base-c6 on my laptop for some time. I recently noticed that ports/emulators/linux_base-c7 now exists (as of r421391: 2016-09-05 13:10:30 -0700 (Mon, 05 Sep 2016)). On the other hand, while I count 76 "linux{,base}-c6*" ports

Re: Serial ports guru help is needed

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 07:10:33PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > ... > So, back to this usecase: Will a software someone is using to > talk to logic analyzers, MSOs, oscilloscopes, multimeters, LCR > meters, sound level meters, thermometers, hygrometers, anemometers, > light meters, DAQs,

Re: Firefox with no sound

On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 12:36:20PM +, Elton Luis Grandolpho wrote: > Hi, > > I am using Firefox and Chromium in my computer. > > Sound works fine using Chromium(last version), but does not work with > Firefox(last version) using youtube , for example. > > uname -a > FreeBSD FX6100ASUS

Re: lang/rust doesn't play nice with portupgrade -a and probably pkg

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 01:57:43PM +0100, John wrote: > Hi, > > I periodically use portupgrade -a to upgrade the ports (after checking > UPDATING) and it upgrades practically all ports painlessly. But for the > last 6 months or so, the upgrade of rust always bails saying it can't > upgrade for

  1   2   3   >