Re: FreeBSD Port: virtualbox-ose-6.1.20 outdated

On 01/05/21 01:17, Dutchman01 via freebsd-emulation wrote: bugfix release 6.1.22 is released! There is need to upgrade from 6.1.20 to 6.1.22 This is known, automatic notifications already reached the mailing list yesterday at 8:55 UTC The notification actually contained an error and I

Re: poudriere: net/openldap24-server: stage/runaway , building forever

On 09/04/21 11:56, O. Hartmann wrote: On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 10:16:27 +0200 (CEST) Ronald Klop wrote: Hi, The official pkg builders are also stuck for 14-CURRENT. Although at a different port sysutils/msktutil. See main-amd64 at https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/builds?type=package It is stuck in

Re: Portsbase and maildir

On 08/04/21 07:27, Jim Trigg wrote: I am going to submit that PORTSBASE should be something other than /usr/local/. My current preference (though not solid) is /ports/. I would like to reclaim /usr/local for true local (site-based, not distribution-based) things. (Example: local [site-based]

Re: poudriere and gitup

On 05/04/21 23:26, Jose Quinteiro wrote: On 4/4/21 7:35 AM, Carmel wrote: On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 12:18:27 +, Rene Ladan stated: ... Is or will poudriere default to using net/gitup in FreeBSD 13? Is there a way to configure it in the "poudriere.conf" file? There's a "git" option for the "-m

Re: No update for a day on ports?

On 03/04/21 18:10, LuMiWa via freebsd-ports wrote: It is not good. The last was I did red was "portsnap" stay still for awhile. I am portsnap and portmaster user for years. Where should I find information what will happened with /usr/ports. Will gitup just replace, update? I am using FreeBSD

Re: No update for a day on ports?

, Guido Falsi wrote: On 02/04/21 23:16, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote: On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 04:45:00PM +0200, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote: On 02/04/21 15:44, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote: On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 08:55:00AM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! As a minor aside

Re: No update for a day on ports?

On 03/04/21 11:28, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote: On 03/04/21 02:24, The Doctor wrote: On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:05:45AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: On 03/04/21 01:35, The Doctor wrote: Please install gitup and read it's man page, it's straight forward. -- Guido Falsi Results

Re: No update for a day on ports?

On 03/04/21 06:23, Helge Oldach wrote: The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote on Fri, 02 Apr 2021 23:16:53 +0200 (CEST): Git is ready, Is it? # git clone -o freebsd https://git.freebsd.org/ports.git Cloning into 'ports'... fatal: repository 'https://git.freebsd.org/ports.git/' not found # Check

Re: No update for a day on ports?

, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote: On 02/04/21 15:44, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote: On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 08:55:00AM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! As a minor aside, has anyone stated the reason why the user-base of base or ports are moving to git? Yes: https://github.com/bsdimp

Re: No update for a day on ports?

On 03/04/21 01:35, The Doctor wrote: On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:35:57AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote: On 02/04/21 23:16, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote: On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 04:45:00PM +0200, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote: On 02/04/21 15:44, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote

Re: No update for a day on ports?

On 02/04/21 23:16, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote: On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 04:45:00PM +0200, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote: On 02/04/21 15:44, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote: On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 08:55:00AM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! As a minor aside, has anyone stated

Re: No update for a day on ports?

On 02/04/21 15:44, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote: On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 08:55:00AM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! As a minor aside, has anyone stated the reason why the user-base of base or ports are moving to git? Yes: https://github.com/bsdimp/freebsd-git-docs/blob/main/git-why.md

Re: Python 2.7 removal outline

On 27/03/21 12:42, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote: On 27/03/21 10:44, Anatoly wrote: On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 23:06:27 -0700 Chris wrote: On 2021-03-25 22:24, Kurt Jaeger wrote: The portmgr@ role is a huge task and all the reasons (limited time, dayjobs, etc) ares  valid for those folks

Re: Python 2.7 removal outline

On 27/03/21 10:44, Anatoly wrote: On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 23:06:27 -0700 Chris wrote: On 2021-03-25 22:24, Kurt Jaeger wrote: The portmgr@ role is a huge task and all the reasons (limited time, dayjobs, etc) ares valid for those folks from portmgr as for the rest of the ports maintainers and

Re: freebsd-ports Digest, Vol 930, Issue 4

On 25/03/21 15:43, Adriaan de Groot wrote: On Thursday, 25 March 2021 13:00:02 CET freebsd-ports-requ...@freebsd.org wrote: The idea is to try to have www/qt5-webengine fixed before the expiration time, saving with it a bunch of innocent ports depending on it, correct? In the sense of "have

Re: Python 2.7 removal outline

On 24/03/21 14:03, Rene Ladan wrote: Hi, below is an outline continuing the Python 2.7 cleanup: - all affected ports are now marked as deprecated, with an expiration date of either 2020-12-31 or 2021-06-23. - we will have to wait for Chromium to fully switch to Python 3 before we can

Re: On 14-CURRENT: no ports options anymore?

On 13/03/21 20:17, Hartmann, O. wrote: Since I moved on to 14-CURRENT, I face a very strange behaviour when trying to set options via "make config" or via poudriere accordingly. I always get "===> Options unchanged" (when options has been already set and I'd expect a dialog menu). This

Re: having trouble "svn up"-ing /usr/ports/

On 05/02/21 18:11, Michael Schuster wrote: Hi, sorry if this is the wrong group - please point me to the proper place if that's the case. I updated to Current (14) on Feb 2nd from source (including running mergemaster) Since at least yesterday any attempt at "svn up" in /usr/ports either

Re: poudriere merging multiple ports trees

On 25/01/21 00:24, Russell L. Carter wrote: On 1/24/21 2:23 PM, Guido Falsi wrote: On 24/01/21 20:35, Russell L. Carter wrote: Greetings, I am completely ignorant here and am looking for up to date advice on how to get poudriere to build and make available package sets from multiple ports

Re: poudriere merging multiple ports trees

On 24/01/21 20:35, Russell L. Carter wrote: Greetings, I am completely ignorant here and am looking for up to date advice on how to get poudriere to build and make available package sets from multiple ports trees.  I see there is a port "portshaker" that seems to do much of what I want. I can

Re: Xfce, xfce4-terminal, and UTF-8

On 01/01/21 23:37, George Mitchell wrote: On 1/1/21 3:12 PM, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote: [...] .cshrc does not look like the correct place for it anyway. That file is executed multiple times during a session. I'm not sure how it can work for everything else. Also the fact that XFCE

Re: Xfce, xfce4-terminal, and UTF-8

On 01/01/21 21:09, George Mitchell wrote: On 1/1/21 2:57 PM, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote: On 01/01/21 20:12, George Mitchell wrote: I applied the patch from https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27846 to my ports tree and recompiled with no problems.  But it did not change the compose key

Re: Xfce, xfce4-terminal, and UTF-8

On 01/01/21 20:12, George Mitchell wrote: I applied the patch from https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27846 to my ports tree and recompiled with no problems.  But it did not change the compose key behavior (still fails in xfce4-terminal but works elsewhere). I actually have no idea. I don't know

Re: Xfce, xfce4-terminal, and UTF-8

On 01/01/21 01:22, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote: On 31/12/20 23:57, George Mitchell wrote: On 12/31/20 3:11 PM, George Mitchell wrote: I set LOCALE to en_US.UTF-8 and LC_CTYPE to C.  Upon login, I run setxkbmap -option compose:lwin.  Consequently, I can enter all the UTF-8 characters I

Re: Xfce, xfce4-terminal, and UTF-8

On 31/12/20 23:57, George Mitchell wrote: On 12/31/20 3:11 PM, George Mitchell wrote: I set LOCALE to en_US.UTF-8 and LC_CTYPE to C.  Upon login, I run setxkbmap -option compose:lwin.  Consequently, I can enter all the UTF-8 characters I need, such as é, ç, and even ™, into most X-based

Re: portmaster new development

On 29/12/20 00:07, Tatsuki Makino wrote: Where should I hang out to reply? :) poudriere has weaknesses in updating packages such as libxml and glib. When run all at once, all packages that depend on the package being updated and all packages that depend on the package being removed will be

Re: FireFox keeps loosing data

On 13/11/20 07:58, Andrea Venturoli wrote: On 11/12/20 9:52 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote: Never use file locking on NFS.  Period.  One day it *will* bite you, due to some yet-to-be-discovered bug.  In the meantime, feel free to ignore the advice of those who have been there before... Thanks for

Re: Reason for +MANIFEST & +COMPACT_MANIFEST birthday of 1 Jan 1970

On 07/11/20 20:51, Yuet-nan Wong via freebsd-ports wrote: Is there a particular reason why? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_time -- Guido Falsi ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports

Re: Icingaweb2

On 27/09/20 18:06, Xavier Humbert wrote: Hi, pkg update broke icingaweb2 : * it upgraded php73 to php74, which at first glance is not a problem * deleted blindly icingaweb2 without noticing that icingaweb2-php74 was present So I reinstalled manually icingaweb2-php74, and when launching the

Re: graphics/vigra broken, unbreak?

On 02/04/20 23:30, Felix Palmen wrote: Hello all, I'm referring to here. This port is currently broken with default options because science/hdf5 moved to a new API. I think this is an important issue because graphics/vigra is a

Re: Alternatives to security/swatch

On 15/03/20 18:09, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > I'm using security/swatch to look *in real time* for specific strings in > my logs, but now it's deprecated because it's unfetchable. > > Can someone suggest an alternative? > > N.B. I'm not looking for something that will parse logs at