Recent CURRENT host (FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #26 main-n245806-4d221f59b85: Sat Apr
3
06:43:44 CEST 2021 amd64), poudriere CURRENT jail at 14.0-CURRENT 147 amd64
from
2021-04-08 05:25:38. It seems that the recent CURRENT does have a serious
problem when
building net/openldap24-server. The
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:42:28 +0200
Michael Gmelin wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2021 13:08:19 +0200
> "Hartmann, O." wrote:
>
> > What am I missing here?
> >
>
> The man page of git-http-backend has an apache2 example[0].
> Also, the top answer to th
On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:42:28 +0200
Michael Gmelin wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2021 13:08:19 +0200
> "Hartmann, O." wrote:
>
> > What am I missing here?
> >
>
> The man page of git-http-backend has an apache2 example[0].
> Also, the top answer to th
Hello folks,
first of all sorry for "misusing" the lis for this question of mine. But maybe
someone
already has setup devel/git over HTTPS and it is working. I fail for several
days for now
and I'm unable to find the problem.
After realized that the content of the book "Pro Git" by Chacon and
Since I moved on to 14-CURRENT, I face a very strange behaviour when trying to
set
options via "make config" or via poudriere accordingly. I always get "===>
Options
unchanged" (when options has been already set and I'd expect a dialog menu).
This misbehaviour is throughout ALL 14-CURRENT
I'm working on an update of a port we maintain here ourselfs and since
a couple of months for now, out of the blue this port (textproc/refdb
in carnation rev 1.0.2) won't build anymore, always failing due to an
error in poudriere's log, stating:
[...]
===> refdb-1.0.2 depends on shared
Am 03/11/13 11:17, schrieb Dimitry Andric:
On 2013-03-10 00:39, Steve Kargl wrote:
...
If you have a clang built FreeBSD-current, then it is no
longer possible to *bootstrap* gcc-4.6.x, gcc-4.7.x, nor
the upcoming gcc-4.8.0. AFAICT, the problem is related
to /usr/bin/cpp. I haven't tried
I try to compile port lang/ruby19 and I always get on a FreeBSD
9.1-STABLE box the following error message, which is obviously triggered
by some port auditing - but I do not find the knob to switch it off.
Can someone give a hint, please?
Regards,
Oliver
=== Cleaning for ruby-1.9.3.392,1
===
Am 03/09/13 10:38, schrieb Chris Rees:
On 9 March 2013 09:37, Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
I try to compile port lang/ruby19 and I always get on a FreeBSD
9.1-STABLE box the following error message, which is obviously triggered
by some port auditing - but I do not find
I have one specific FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT box (FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0
r248061: Fri Mar 8 19:44:30 CET 2013 amd64) which rejects to build
either lang/gcc or lang/gcc46 with the very same error shown below.
The box is compiled with CLANG (buildworld/kernel).
It doesn't matter whether I compile
I rebuild the kernel module for x11/nvidia-driver on a regular basis via
/etc/src.conf setting of
PORTS_MODULES+=x11/nvidia-driver
but this time, the port gets deleted and - fails to compile (tried
310.32 and 313.26, the latter worked for me before very well).
The compilation
Am 03/09/13 17:38, schrieb Ruslan Makhmatkhanov:
Hartmann, O. wrote on 09.03.2013 20:31:
I rebuild the kernel module for x11/nvidia-driver on a regular basis via
/etc/src.conf setting of
PORTS_MODULES+=x11/nvidia-driver
I answered to your pr. Did you tried that?
If I
Am 03/09/13 17:02, schrieb Dimitry Andric:
On Mar 9, 2013, at 16:36 , Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
I have one specific FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT box (FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0
r248061: Fri Mar 8 19:44:30 CET 2013 amd64) which rejects to build
either lang/gcc or lang/gcc46
Am 03/09/13 17:46, schrieb Ruslan Makhmatkhanov:
Hartmann, O. wrote on 09.03.2013 20:45:
Am 03/09/13 17:38, schrieb Ruslan Makhmatkhanov:
Hartmann, O. wrote on 09.03.2013 20:31:
I rebuild the kernel module for x11/nvidia-driver on a regular basis
via
/etc/src.conf setting of
PORTS_MODULES
Am 03/09/13 18:07, schrieb David Wolfskill:
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 06:06:05PM +0100, Hartmann, O. wrote:
...
No, it isn't. Same error, system is at revision:
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #1 r248106: Sat Mar 9 16:44:58 CET 2013 amd64
The error is the same.
...
Please see the message I posted
On all FreeBSD boxes with
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #1 r247839: Tue Mar 5 12:28:12 CET 2013/amd64 the
build of ports - or updating/upgrading ports is BROKEN!
Every port which is about to be updated fails with
[...]
*** [do-extract] Signal 13
This is common on ALL CURRENT systems so I consider this
Last time I update ports on my latop was on Dec 20th. Everything went
well. Today I grabbed the laptop again, made an update of the ports tree
and try running portmaster.
The laptop is running FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #142 r244377: Tue Dec 18
07:29:18 CET 2012.
The update of pkgng is the first in
Hello.
I'd like to try pkgng with portmaster. I see that pkg2ng is involving
the directory /var/db/pkg, so this implies that there may implications
also for usage with ports-mgmt/portmaster. portmaster is supposed to be
the tool completely dependend on system's toolsets, isn't it?
I know that
Hello.
On one of my boxes I have a persistent problem with Firefox since the
last major update/recompilation a week ago due to the massive PNG
update. OS is FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64, CLANG compiled.
First of all, neither firefox 12 nor 13 compile with CLANG. Firefox 12
also rejects compiling
On 05/07/12 11:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following:
Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang is the official compiler, because
4.2.1 is just too old for libreoffice, and I never
I found myself incapable of rebuilding/updating editors/libreoffice on
ALL FreeBSD 9-STABLE and FreeBSD 10-CURRENT (amd64) platforms with the
very same error message as shown below.
It doesn't matter whether I try to build/update with CLANG or the legacy
gcc 4.2.1. GCC 4.6 and 4.7 fail due to
This morning, I get this when trying to update the local portssystem:
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap6.FreeBSD.org... done.
Fetching snapshot metadata... done.
look: tINDEX.new: File too large
Portsnap metadata appears bogus.
Since the change of one of my boxes to FreeBSD 10.0 and some
accindetally build of ports without the suggested settings for UNAME_r
before building ports, I think I've messed up with some ports and need
some advice how to fixate the problem.
Some develish motivation drove me today building
On 09/29/11 18:31, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
On 09/28/11 14:29, O. Hartmann wrote:
I run in a problem on FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3/10.0-CURRENT using OpenLDAP
(Cyrus SASL2 aktivated) and OpenLDAP backend (most recent client and
server). Thunderbird 6.0.2 and 7.0 coredumps with signal 11. I hadn't
any
On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
2011/9/27 O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de:
Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin
10 'X' for their tenth version of their operating system ...
FreeBSD XP anyone?
Are you sure
On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
2011/9/27 O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de:
Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin
10 'X' for their tenth version of their operating
On 09/28/11 19:43, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 10:29 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
2011/9/27 O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de:
Now I understand why
On 09/28/11 20:20, h h wrote:
Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de writes:
On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
2011/9/27 O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de:
Now I understand why some OS
On 09/28/11 20:41, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 20:20, h h wrote:
Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de writes:
On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com
On 09/28/11 20:15, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 19:43, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 10:29 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
2011/9/27 O. Hartmann ohart
On 09/28/11 20:56, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 20:41, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 20:20, h h wrote:
Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de writes:
On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com
On 09/28/11 21:16, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 20:56, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 20:41, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 20:20, h h wrote:
Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de writes:
On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote
On 09/28/11 21:30, Matt wrote:
On 09/28/11 12:16, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 20:56, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 20:41, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 20:20, h h wrote:
Hartmann, O.ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de writes:
On 09/28
On 09/28/11 22:18, Doug Barton wrote:
On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
The mess started to happen when I tried to repair a non CLANG
compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/gotoblas.
Since this build binutils and even gettext and libiconv, I guess they
got broken. Last I
On 09/27/11 16:27, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 09:36:17AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Robert Huff, and lo! it spake thus:
Adrian Chadd writes:
Our children will be dealing with Y2038. :-)
Statistically, some of us will.
Actually, I had to deal with it just last week...
Performing an update of the ports on a regular basis brought us
security/cyrus-sasl2 version 2.1.25. After performing the update,
OpenLDAP won't start anymore!
It is essential, that the openldap-port is recompiled after upgarding
cyrus-sasl2! This has not been reflected by ports/UPDATING so far.
I was wondering if the SUN Grid Engine, located in port
sysutils/sge6[012] is still broken due to utmpx.
My department uses this GRID engine on Linux and since a long time I
wish to use it also on FreeBSD.
Are there alternatives? What are people using on HPC FreeBSD?
Greetings,
Oliver
On 09/23/11 09:04, Hartmann, O. wrote:
I was wondering if the SUN Grid Engine, located in port
sysutils/sge6[012] is still broken due to utmpx.
My department uses this GRID engine on Linux and since a long time I
wish to use it also on FreeBSD.
Are there alternatives? What are people using
On 08/14/11 11:48, Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 2011-08-13 12:08, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote:
On Fri
On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
Does this file
Since today, I can not update my ports tree due to this error as follows.
This happens on all boxes running FreeBSD, the version of the OS (FBSD
8.2/9.0) doesn't
matter. What's up with the ports collection?
Regards,
Oliver
Extracting new files:
/usr/ports/GIDs
/usr/ports/UIDs
On 08/12/11 20:21, Roland Smith wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:38:06PM +0200, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2011/8/12 Roland Smithrsm...@xs4all.nl:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:46:37PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
Since today, I can not update my ports tree due to this error as follows.
This happens
On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
This file is relatively recent; When I used portsnap yesterday, it wasn't
there, and now it is.
I do a postrmaster
When performing a portmaster -av after today's update of the ports tree,
I receive this error:
=== virtualbox-ose-4.0.10
awk: syntax error at source line 1
context is
NR == 1 { gsub(/[()]/, , )
awk: illegal statement at source line 1
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.qt.mk, line 115: warning: cc
Since the notice mentioned in /usr/src/UPDATE (20110608) both gcc-4.5
and 4.6 seems to need to be recompiled. I tried some ports with
USE_FORTRAN= yes setand they failed as with gcc-4.6. There was always
an error reporting: undefined reference to __cpumask_t or similar.
Oliver
On 05/31/11 15:09, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 31/05/2011 15:22 Olivier Smedts said the following:
2011/5/31 Andriy Gapona...@freebsd.org:
on 31/05/2011 12:11 Olivier Smedts said the following:
Segmentation fault: 11 (core dumped)
That core dump should be investigated / debugged.
At the very
Port x11/nvidia-driver fails with the the following error. This error
obviously was introduced within the updates of the last few days, since
building the specific port was possible before the last weekend. Does
anyone has an idea?
Regards,
Oliver
=== Vulnerability check disabled,
47 matches
Mail list logo
