P.S. Apologies for using the word "ignored" - it's an emotive word, and
that wasn't the intent - I didn't mean it in a critical way.
Cheers, Jamie
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsu
There are updates to 2 ports that are not being actioned - one of the ports has
since
been marked for deletion as it no longer works, and the fix is almost 2 years
old! (I
updated the fix a few months ago)
How do I go about getting these actioned?
emulators/rtc https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla
bob prohaska wrote:
> Setting MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER_LIMIT=2 allowed www/chromium to compile successfully
> over
> several days. The -DBATCH option was used, in hopes it'd fetch the right
> options.
Use "make config-recursive" before you start. It will present to you upfront all
the option screens
Xin Li wrote:
> > I was going to suggest this too. Isn't this information available
> > using /bin/freebsd-version -u ?
>
> Client side: yes.
>
> Server side: someone has to tell the server to start building for new
> - -CURRENT or stop building for old -STABLE.
Ahhh! Gotcha! Thanks for the qui
Xin Li wrote:
> On 8/6/15 22:24, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Or the code in portsnap could be modified to get the current
> > running version.
>
> I thought about this today but it won't work as advertised: someone
> (currently me) still have to tweak the portsnap builder configuration
> to announce
Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Isn't rebuilding the index useful for people running STABLE? I assume that
> I need a current index to get useful output from "pkg version -vL=". I am
> probably a bit unusual in that I keep a current ports tre on a STABLE
> system, but there are a couple of ports that I ne
Bryan Drewery wrote:
Bryan, thanks for the quick reply, and apologies for my duplicate
post cock-up.
> > 2) Replace gnutls with gnutls3
>
> We will be doing (2) soon.
> >
> > or:
> >
> > 3) Use a bit of bsd.port.Mk magic to handle this situation - so that
> > if only gnutls3 is installed, th
Hi. Many ports that require gnutls fail if security/gnutls3 and not
security/gnutls are installed.
( E.G. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=186785 )
Whilst seemingly gnutls and gnutls3 can co-exist, the ports
that depend on gnutls being installed pass the lib dependency
when seeing the g
Hi. Many ports that require gnutls fail if security/gnutls3 and not
security/gnutls are installed.
( E.G. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=186785 )
Whilst seemingly gnutls and gnutls3 can co-exist, the ports
that depend on gnutls being installed pass the lib dependency
when seeing the g
