Re: Policy on closing bugs

On 24.05.19 12:07, Grzegorz Junka wrote: Hey, Is there any policy/document when a bug can be closed? For example, is it OK to close a bug that is fixed upstream but not yet in ports? Thanks GrzegorzJ I don't know of any official policy, but as a user (and port maintainer) I would prefer an

Re: irc/ngircd: typo in Makefile

Probably ;-) Please create a PR for this to get it fixed. On 15.04.19 21:09, Serpent7776 wrote: Hello, I've just stumbled upon a possible typo in Makefile: DEBUG_CONFIGURE_EBABLE=¦¦ debug Shouldn't this be ENABLE instead of EBABLE? ___

Re: python 3 subprocess performance

The reason is that that python does something stupid (tm). It tries to close all file descriptors (except a few whitelisted ones) up to the maximum file descriptor number. It does this by asking the kernel for the maximum possible number and closing everything it doesn't want to keep. Some time

Re: python 3 subprocess performance

Please run python under truss -f. Does it try to close(2) all possible file descriptors? Does the runtime decrease if fdescfs is mounted at /dev/fd? On 11.04.19 15:16, Alexander Zagrebin wrote: > Hi! > > I've noticed the subprocess performance issue with python 3. > For example, this simple

Re: WireGuard for FreeBSD

On 25.05.18 15:11, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Jan Bramkamp <cr...@rlwinm.de> wrote: On 25.05.18 09:29, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:24 AM, Chris H <portmas...@bsdforge.com> wrote: On Thu, 24 May 2018 22:16:42 +0200 "B

Re: WireGuard for FreeBSD

On 24.05.18 13:07, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:43 PM, Jan Bramkamp <cr...@rlwinm.de> wrote: Did I understand correctly that both these ports are userspace implementations and have a similar per packet overhead to OpenVPN and fastd? Indeed they're userspace

Re: WireGuard for FreeBSD

On 25.05.18 09:29, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:24 AM, Chris H wrote: On Thu, 24 May 2018 22:16:42 +0200 "Bernhard Froehlich" said Am 24.05.2018 21:06 schrieb Chris H : On Thu, 24 May 2018

Re: WireGuard for FreeBSD

On 24.05.18 09:15, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 3:06 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: We now have a release, so the full instructions for the packages are: 1. wireguard-tools, providing wg(8) and wg-quick(8) Runtime dependencies: bash, wireguard-go Buildtime

Re: saslauthd ldap connection to Samba AD

I use saslauthd with GSSAPI (aka Kerberos) authentication inside jails. IIRC you have to install a second package to add GSSAPI support to saslauthd. On 18.04.18 15:49, Andrea Venturoli wrote: Hello. I'm trying to setup saslauthd (in a jail) to authenticate to a Samba AD DC (in another

Re: THANK YOU for flavors!

On 07.12.17 13:51, Baho Utot wrote: users also don't want to wake up to the fact that what worked a few days ago not is working ie fetch/update port repo run synth and then get a " What the fuck has just happened now" only to be put down by the so called folks in charge here for even asking.

Re: Flavors *COMPLETELY* break the port system (synth and poudriere are useless)

On 06.12.17 23:23, Dave Horsfall wrote: On Wed, 6 Dec 2017, Jan Bramkamp wrote: Synth and poudriere are parallel build tools and as such are very taxing on the system. I suspect your system is unstable under such load, because of a configuration error or unreliable hardware. One

Re: Flavors *COMPLETELY* break the port system (synth and poudriere are useless)

On 05.12.17 10:53, Aryeh Friedman wrote: First some background (my typical use cases for ports): 0. FreeBSD lilith 11.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE #0 r321664: Fri Jul 28 23:35:18 EDT 2017 root@lilith:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 1. Daily routine (current): cd /usr/src

Re: Spam on -ports

with the right people? -- Jan Bramkamp ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Chicken/egg problem with pkg

On 10/03/2017 17:04, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! I have an old web server (10.1-RELEASE-p9) which is running for years I had one with 9.3 something, and upgrading it from the pkg repo took not a huge amount of time, yesterday evening... So maybe upgrading is a good thing, if not too many fancy

Re: Chicken/egg problem with pkg

On 10/03/2017 15:08, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 02:55:13PM +0100, Jan Bramkamp wrote: Among other things FreeBSD 10.3 added a bunch of new *at() system calls like openat. These *at() system calls are useful inside (capsicum) sandboxes. Your old 10.1 kernel lacks those

Re: Chicken/egg problem with pkg

On 10/03/2017 14:47, Guido Falsi wrote: On 03/10/17 14:26, Hans de Hartog wrote: I have an old web server (10.1-RELEASE-p9) which is running for years without any upgrades. Now I want to install a simple port (trafshow, to see what's going on). It first want to upgrade pkg from 1.5.1 to

Re: Chicken/egg problem with pkg

On 10/03/2017 14:26, Hans de Hartog wrote: I have an old web server (10.1-RELEASE-p9) which is running for years without any upgrades. Now I want to install a simple port (trafshow, to see what's going on). It first want to upgrade pkg from 1.5.1 to 1.10.0_2 but that doesn't work: [1/1]

Re: The future of portmaster

On 17/02/2017 09:25, Matthieu Volat wrote: On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 10:37:16 +0300 abi wrote: 17.02.2017 00:22, Chris H пишет: On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:48:57 -0500 Baho Utot wrote On 02/16/17 15:40, George Mitchell wrote: On 02/16/17 15:33, Baho Utot

Re: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client

On 05/01/2017 11:56, Franco Fichtner wrote: On 5 Jan 2017, at 11:44 AM, Julian Elischer <jul...@freebsd.org> wrote: On 5/01/2017 6:30 PM, Jan Bramkamp wrote: On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote: Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install both s

Re: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client

On 05/01/2017 12:04, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 01/05/17 10:43, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! [openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client and libreoffice etc] Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and set the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With binary

Re: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client

On 05/01/2017 11:43, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! [openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client and libreoffice etc] Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and set the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With binary packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems

Re: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client

On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote: Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install both samba44 and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository? Or samba44 and KDE? If yes, then that sucks... Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own

Re: harder and harder to avoid pkg

well. Can you use a read-only lzma or gzip compressed filesystem with GEOM uncompress? * Can you use snapshots (and rerooting) to rollback failed updates instead of keeping two full copies around? -- Jan Bramkamp ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org maili

Re: Mailman in a jail

On 21/04/16 17:21, Jim Ohlstein wrote: Hello, I'm trying to get Mailman working in a 10.3 amd64 jail. Everything works, except Mailman doesn't talk to Postfix. Incoming mail works and posts to the list's archives but no outgoing email is sent. I asked in the Mailman list and they seem to think

Re: Maintainer for multimedia/zoneminder

On 02/03/16 16:15, Kristian Kræmmer Nielsen wrote: Hi, This mail-address is written in "MAINTAINER" for multimedia/zoneminder - does that actually mean the port has no maintainer? Exactly. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Packages lagging for 10.2

On 08/09/15 14:45, Kubilay Kocak wrote: On 8/09/2015 5:21 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 08/09/2015 07:46, Jimmy Renner wrote: I don't know if this is the right list to post to but for me lots (a bit over 100) of ports are updated but if I do a pkg upgrade not much is updated. This has been