Hi guys,
Stlink has a new v1.4.0 new release.
Kind regards,
Jerry Jacobs
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> >
> > > Hmm, 2.2.3 < 2.2.6, so it's a downgrade, not an upgrade ?
> >
> > Sorry, meant "2.3"
>
> Ah, that works out. Do you have a link to the changelog/improvements ?
You can probably find what you want here:
<https://www.getsync.com/platform
> > The ports version of net-p2p/btsync is "2.2.6". The latest released
> > version for FreeBSD is "2.2.3" which includes several improvements.
> > Is it possible that the ports version could be updated?
>
> Hmm, 2.2.3 < 2.2.6, so it's a downgrade,
The ports version of net-p2p/btsync is "2.2.6". The latest released version for
FreeBSD is "2.2.3" which includes several improvements. Is it possible that the
ports version could be updated?
Thanks
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:21:58PM -0500, Joe Nosay wrote:
> of how self-centered and selfish all of you are.
>
This is a useless post.
////jerry
>
>
> https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/making-it-public.54392/#post-309037
> ___
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 18:37:37 -0700, Doug Hardie stated:
Some of us don’t use the ports version of openssl because of the issues with
v1.xxx.
What specific issue?
--
Jerry
pgpckEj8vNeP7.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
/desktop-browsers.html and
remembered to run nspluginwrapper -v -a -i or nspluginwrapper -v -a
-u depending on which one is applicable.
--
Jerry
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe
instead.
But would be good to be warned about this change.
Same here. I had to downgrade to the 340 version.
Question: I use portupgrade to keep my ports current. How can I configure it
to NEVER upgrade nvidia?
--
Jerry
pgpD3fJUX2FPn.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
'
*** Error code 1
Stop.
make: stopped in /usr/ports/www/webkit-gtk2
The entire build log is available here:
http://seibercom.net/logs/webkit-gtk2.txt
--
Jerry
pgplEVY8xFx80.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
have posted a notice on the FreeBSD home page regarding that
though.
--
Jerry
pgpslhR49K8sW.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
.
--
Jerry
pgp3eC0RpPNXr.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-qt4
=== pinentry-qt4-0.9.0_1 does not compile with libc++.
The build then obviously stops. Is this a known problem or should I file a
PR against it?
--
Jerry
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
/ !:failed)
! www/webkit-gtk2 (webkit-gtk2-1.8.3_7) (unknown build error)
The entire build log is available here:
http://seibercom.net/logs/webkit-gtk2.txt
--
Jerry
pgpLRha3U98YY.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Fri, 12 Dec 2014 06:27:41 -0500
UPDATING 20141209 does not specifically list having to install the
emulators/linux-c6 port. Isn't that a required prerequisite?
--
Jerry
pgpvlbMkT6hl5.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
:49:00 -0500 (consumed 00:00:57)
This is a FreeBSD-10.1 amd64 system.
--
Jerry
pgpIteBKOinCD.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to figure out if I am the only one with this problem.
--
Jerry
pgpoGiShF73Lp.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
to be ludicrous.
Welcome to the wonderful world of BULLSHIT. If what you are saying is true,
and I believe it to be so, I am sure that someone, somehow, will try and
justify it. Now that is ludicrous.
--
Jerry
pgpiF42nG8RrV.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
=195206
The nvidia-driver port had a similar problem. That problem has been
corrected. Perhaps applying the same methodology here would be fruitful.
--
Jerry
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
to be no problem without having libEGL installed, because there is
a libEGL version from nvidia-driver installed.
Of course, it would be better, if someone could solve the conflict of
the two ports ;)
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194924
--
Jerry
pgp4sqK9gOoh7.pgp
Description: OpenPGP
}}}
Cheers,
Matthew
mail_version = 2.12-20141020 reported error with file permissions also;
although it did start.
--
Jerry
pgp3SftEipjKR.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
what they are required for; but then again, I
did not investigate all the thoroughly. It is a Sunday, my birthday, and I
have far more important things to do than figure out why a port is bombing
out.
--
Jerry
pgpuP_q2f55YP.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:06:35 +, Matthew Seaman stated:
Actually, I'd recommend switching to lmdb rather than BDB. It's what
I've been using for going on a year now, and it works great.
I have been looking for a good How-to on converting to MDB, but have not
been able to find one.
--
Jerry
not work well because package
management by them conflicts with pkg(8) and can damage the installed
files in an unexpected way.
The ports system is ill equipped to keep the individual packages in TeXLive
up-to-date. There should be some way to eliminate its interference with
TeXLive.
--
Jerry
=yes in the /etc/make.conf file, do I still have to rebuild all
the ports on my system? I am running FreeBSD-10 amd64.
--
Jerry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
work, I just transfer the file to that machine. I just don't like to have to
use the Windows machine every time I just want to view or print a PDF
document located on my FreeBSD machine.
I will give your suggestion a perusal. Thanks!
--
Jerry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
any program that works
like Adobe Acrobat does on FreeBSD, but at least I need the functionality of
regular Adobe for working with PDF files.
--
Jerry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 04 Aug 2014 12:44:12 +0100, Matthew Seaman stated:
Err... no. I don't believe send-pr does anything useful at the moment.
So, exactly what does a send-pr do now exactly? If it does nothing, there
should have been some public notice of it AND have been removed from the
system.
--
Jerry
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:25:25 +0200, Kurt Jaeger stated:
Hi!
https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/freebsd-gecko/trunk/www/linux-tor-browser
Thanks -- is this official ? Is this supposed to be added to the
ports ?
It would be great to have the latest version in the ports system.
--
Jerry
Sun, 27 Jul 2014 15:24:21 -0400
Is there a port of the Tor web browser https://www.torproject.org/
available? The site lists one for BSD, but I would prefer to get it via the
port's system
--
Jerry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Fri, 18 Jul 2014 15:18:30 -0400
Could someone look into Bug 191256 - [exp-run requested] security/libgcrypt:
update to 1.6.1 and possibly committing it?
Thanks!
--
Jerry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Fri, 4 Jul 2014 13:19:27 -0400
I was just wondering if this port could please be committed.
--
Jerry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
The latest version of libgcrypt available in the ports system is
libgcrypt-1.5.3_2; however, the latest stable version is Libgcrypt 1.6.1,
released on 29 January 2014, (http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Libgcrypt).
Are there any plans to update this port?
--
Jerry
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 23:02:07 +0200, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina stated:
I submitted a patch[1] to update from 1.5.3 to 1.6.1
Thanks!
--
Jerry
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
that a port of this
application could be created?
--
Jerry
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
problem, but I cannot
test it because I cannot create the environment.
Seriously, there are plenty of real problems. Attempting to anticipate
theoretical ones and then devise hypothetical solutions is a job best left
to those working on quantum physics.
--
Jerry
: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/py-dbus
The entire build log is available here:
http://www.seibercom.net/logs/py27-dbus.txt
There is nothing in UPDATING at least that I can find that deals with this.
Should I delete the problematic file manually? Portupgrade doesn't touch it.
--
Jerry
/libexosip2
The entire build log is located here:
http://www.seibercom.net/logs/libexosip.txt
--
Jerry
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr
log is located here:
http://www.seibercom.net/logs/libexosip.txt
--
Jerry
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
*** Error code 1
Stop.
make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/net/libexosip2/work/libeXosip2-4.1.0
*** Error code 1
Stop.
make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/net/libexosip2
*** Error code 1
--
jerry
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
.
--
Jerry
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
of the available ports and then retried the cups port. It went without a
problem. I have no idea why though.
--
Jerry
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd
I am trying to create a new port. If I put:
LICENSE=BSD
portlint is happy; however, running make makeplist reports an error:
LICENSE must not contain BSD, instead use BSD[234]CLAUSE
I cannot find anything in the Porters Handbook that directly relates to
this.
--
Jerry
On Thu, 15 May 2014 07:33:01 -0400, Renato Botelho stated:
Do you remember what was the version you had installed when tried to
build the new version? I'm still trying to reproduce the issue to be able
It was the latest version available before this new one was released.
--
Jerry
On Mon, 12 May 2014 11:03:50 -0300, Renato Botelho stated:
On Thursday, May 08, 2014 04:35:11 PM Jerry wrote:
FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE
I am unable to update to clamav-0.98.3. It terminates with the
following error message:
clamd.c:335:59: warning: format specifies type 'unsigned int
subscribe here: https://www.cups.org/mailman/listinfo/cups.
--
Jerry
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On: Saturday, March 29, 2014 12:41 AM, Kevin Oberman replied:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Jerry je...@seibercom.net
mailto:je...@seibercom.net wrote:
FreeBSD-10.0 amd64
I have been unable to get the “textproc/docbook-xml” to install. I followed the
directions in “UPDATING”; however
On: Thursday, March 27, 2014 5:49 PM, Nicola Vitale replied:
Hi Jerry,
archivers/quazip fails to build.
That's very strange. The port builds fine on my system (FreeBS 10.0-STABLE
amd64) and apparentely on every arch/release
https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r348485/
Anyway, have
or inability for the remaining 10%
cope with this fact. You can cry all night in the dark, or light a candle. I
much prefer to light the candle.
--
Jerry
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
On March 29, 2014 6:52 AM, Chris Rees replied:
On , Jerry wrote:
On: Saturday, March 29, 2014 12:41 AM, Kevin Oberman replied:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Jerry wrote:
FreeBSD-10.0 amd64
I have been unable to get the “textproc/docbook-xml” to install. I
followed the directions
-5.0_1 conflicts with
docbook-5.0_1 (installs files into the same place). Problematic file:
/usr/local/share/xml/docbook/5.0/catalog.xml
*** Error code 70
Stop.
make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/textproc/docbook-xml
*** Error code 1
Stop.
make: stopped in /usr/ports/textproc/docbook-xml
--
Jerry
succeeds index (index has 1.7.7_11,1)
How is that even possible? I don't recall seeing anything in UPDATING that
referred to this.
--
Jerry
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:15:31 +0100, olli hauer stated:
/usr/sbin/pkg version -vIL=
On 2014-03-23 12:05, Jerry wrote:
When I ran the following command after updating my port's tree:
/usr/sbin/pkg version -vIL=
It produced the following output:
dri-9.1.7_3,2
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:42:22 +0100, Matthias Andree stated:
Am 23.03.2014 12:39, schrieb Jerry:
/usr/sbin/portsnap fetch update
/usr/local/sbin/portsdb -u
/usr/sbin/pkg version -vIL=
I just reran those command and it produced the exact same results.
portsdb is irrelevant here
I see that Python 3.4.0 has been released
http://blog.python.org/2014/03/python-340-released.html. Are there any
plans to incorporate it into the ports system?
--
Jerry
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On Saturday, March 22, 2014 7:04 AM Kubilay Kocak wrote:
On 22/03/2014 9:08 PM, Jerry wrote:
I see that Python 3.4.0 has been released
http://blog.python.org/2014/03/python-340-released.html. Are there
any plans to incorporate it into the ports system?
Hi Jerry :)
I'm a major part
it to compile. There should have been a note in UPDATING regarding
this known problem. Now all I want is to get KDE4 to run. I must be a
masochist.
Jerry
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
available in the ports system. Do I have to enter that
information shown above in my /etc/make.conf file prior to updating KDE?
--
Jerry
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any
as well? Perhaps an option in the ca_root_nss
port might be a good thing.
--
Jerry
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:57:00 +0100, Marko Cupać stated:
I have problem building net/openldap24-client on 10-RELEASE amd64:
=== Building for openldap-client-2.4.38
make[2]: make[2]: don't know how to make OPENSSL_CFLAGS. Stop
Should I send PR?
Only if you want it fixed.
--
Jerry
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 09:14:55 +0100, Matthias Andree stated:
Jerry je...@seibercom.net schrieb:
The ports latest version of CUPS is 1.5.4; however version 1.7.0 has
been out since 10/24/13. Is there any possibility that the latest
version will make it into the ports system soon?
Careful
neglected or lag behind other operating systems
might be a good investment.
In any case, you obviously have no personal knowledge of what is
transpiring with this port so further discussions with you are futile.
--
Jerry
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
The ports latest version of CUPS is 1.5.4; however version 1.7.0 has
been out since 10/24/13. Is there any possibility that the latest
version will make it into the ports system soon?
Thanks!
--
Jerry
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
: Input/output error
ls: social: Input/output error
ls: title_test.svg: Input/output error
total 14
I have never ran into this before. How do I clean up this mess so I can
attempt to build the port? I am unable to manually delete any of the
files.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list
with this) the link /compat - /usr/compat, so
maybe somewhere realpath comes into use and exhibits a problem
here (here being the staging support in general, not limited to
the port).
I think I can confirm your assessment.
René,
I had the same issue as Jerry (as reported on IRC, on
9.1
it, but time and job
constraints are making it more difficult than I thought. Plus, with the
changes in the port's system, I just don't have the time to learn the
new protocols and get the port ready. I might be able to give you some
assistance, but that would be about it.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer
being the staging support in general, not limited to the
port).
Bye,
Alexander.
Alexander,
I think I can confirm your assessment.
René,
I had the same issue as Jerry (as reported on IRC, on
9.1-RELEASE-amd64), but did not dig deeper.
In the end I sidestepped the problem
-toolkits/linux-f10-pango.
Could this be a STAGEDIR that I have been reading about?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
Manager daemon
Is this a harmless warning or should I consider it serious?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
a PR against it?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:16:57 +0200
Alberto Villa articulated:
It's due to a problem with compiler.mk, already reported yesterday.
Apparently, USES=compiler:c++11-lang doesn't provide such feature on
FreeBSD 9 and below.
I am not finding a PR filed against this. Should I file one?
--
Jerry
are deprecated. If you have set them in your
make.conf, you should change them something like
DEFAULT_VERSIONS=python=2.7 python2=2.7 python3=3.3
Does this affect BERKLEY DB or Ruby also? If not, is it a planned future
implementation?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list
, it will probably be rejected.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
stable, I will upgrade. Therefore my
question is will it be possible to use converters/libiconv via the
ports system should a user so desire to?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
Why is it that most nudists are people you don't want to see naked
or the other? I have seen ports that have
options that require a threaded perl. Why would I not want to use at
least one of the options?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 21:29:33 +0200
Per olof Ljungmark articulated:
And what should we replace it with on a production 9.2-PRERELEASE?
5.14? 5.16? 5.,18?
Unless you have some specific reason for doing otherwise, I would
always take the newest version.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list
recall correctly).
5.18 has some interesting backwards incompatibilities.
Unless I am mistaken, perl-5.18 is not even in the ports system.
Keeping it out simply because some applications may not be 100%
compatible is going to cause more problems than it corrects.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off
2013. Would it be possible to update the ports
version to this release?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:39:17 +0200
Baptiste Daroussin articulated:
Otherwise I'll have to mark all failing packages as broken
on head amd64 in the portstree :(
Ouch :poop:
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
/local/sbin/portinstall print/teTeX-texmf
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports
I have tried running tlmgr from the command line, and it fails. This
is the output:
tlmgr update --list
cannot setup TLPDB in /usr at /usr/local/bin/tlmgr line 4965.
Is this a known problem and is there a fix for it?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored
: eha...@freebsd.org
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Is there any possibility of getting the texmakerx-2.1_4 port, now
officially renamed TeXstudio as of 2011-06-15 updated to the new
release TeXstudio 2.6.0, released on 2013-06-05.
Also, the texmaker-3.5.2,2 port is now at Version 4.0.2 (May 8 2013).
Are there any plans to update that port? I have
?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
the results.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
is new. I simply INSTALLED the port, and then used:
pkg_deinstall -dfv port-name
Problem solved.
HTH
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
worked around so far.
testbox# cd /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt33
testbox# make deinstall
=== Deinstalling for x11-toolkits/qt33
=== qt not installed, skipping
What do I try next?
You have some spare Qt 3 files. Install and deinstall qt33, as
Jerry suggested. --
Alberto Villa
with the db5 version? I believe that I have gotten all of the other
programs that depended on older versions of Berkeley DB upgraded.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
the first to jump on any
software problem, real or imaginary. Is this a FreeBSD specific
problem and if so, what is being done to eradicate it?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:10:17 +0200
Baptiste Daroussin articulated:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 05:49:41AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 10:18:31 +0200
John Marino articulated:
According to OpenBSD's Marc Espie on a pkgsrc list, a lot of
established scripts will break on perl
be nostalgic, but it is one hell of a place to live your
life.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
; ie, \usr\bin\env bash. I use it all the time for shell
scripts that I write for various systems and it hasn't failed me yet.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
Are there any plans to import GTK+ 3.8.0 (STABLE), released on Mon, 25
Mar 2013 into the ports tree?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
for example), even if it
disables certain functionality.
Maybe it is just me; however, wouldn't it make more sense for FreeBSD to
acquire libmount and thereby eliminate the whole problem to begin
with, not to mention losing potential functionality?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get
their minds. To require by
default a depreciate port seems rather short sighted.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
signature.asc
Description: PGP
maintainer created a port with 40 or 50 configurable options, then
they certainly can take the time to fully document them.
Just my 2¢.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
of: pkg_info -R ruby-1.9\* and pkg_info -R
ruby-1.8\* if you still have it installed?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
any problems.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
Bershere's Formula for Failure:
There are only two kinds of people who fail: those
be better served by reporting this to: pyt...@freebsd.org.
You might also want to file a PR against it. I would suggest that you
do a make clean first, update your ports tree and then try to
rebuild the port with its default config settings. You can use script
to make a complete log of the build.
--
Jerry
On Sun, 19 May 2013 13:34:49 -0500
sindrome articulated:
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 19 May 2013 16:52, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Sun, 19 May 2013 09:57:52 -0500
sindrome articulated:
I checked everywhere (in .cshrc etc
1 - 100 of 437 matches
Mail list logo
