years. This problem only started
after a portupgrade several months ago.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
the same error message.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
= No upstream activity since 2008; unmaintained
EXPIRATION_DATE=2013-07-01
I removed x11-toolkits/qt33 from my system and then rebuilt the ports
that were dependent on it with qt-4. Only a few programs absolutely
needed x11-toolkits/qt33 and most of them are about to go away also.
--
Jerry
for:
DON'T_EVEN_THINK_ABOUT_USING_QT3= yes
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
are for:
finance/qtstalker
textproc/xxdiff
The security/pinentry port in its standard configuration requires
security/pinentry-qt which requires x11-toolkits/qt33 also.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
/kate
.if $(.CURDIR:M*/editors/kate)
DEBUG_FLAGS = -ggdb
CFLAGS += ${DEBUG_FLAGS}
WITH_DEBUG = YES
.endif
Is there anything else I have to do to get the port build and installed
with debug symbols?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore
and updating openldap. It may have just been a fluke.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:45:36 +0100
Matthew Seaman articulated:
On 29/04/2013 12:13, Jerry wrote:
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 22:25:23 -0700
Xin Li articulated:
This is weird. We do have some similar construct for the server
package -- if the package is being removed, the daemon would
? I don't want to file a PR if I am the only user with
this problem.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
system. The latest official Stable release: 1.6.2 was released on March
18, 2013.
How do I know whether what usb printers commonly support Freebsd?
You could ask on the CUP forum or check the documentation.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do
happen to suffer from a catastrophic power failure and don't
have a functional UPS installed. In that case, you will probably have
to do a forcible uninstall of all of the affected ports and start over.
pkg_delete -dfv port works for me.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies
the effort it takes to keep it
running anymore.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports
is available here:
http://www.seibercom.net/logs/kopete-kde4.txt
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
for me.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:55:01 +0200
Matthias Apitz articulated:
El día Wednesday, April 10, 2013 a las 03:44:00PM -0400, Jerry
escribió:
I don't have that installed. As far as I can tell, I don't have any
QT3\* ports installed. The closest I can find is
qt4-qt3support-4.8.4 It is shown
in virtual real time and
then we have ports that seem to orphaned. It is too bad we cannot find
a nice happy medium.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
of what can be accomplished, and in virtual real time no less, when
someone dedicates themselves to a task.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
The port version of curl is 7.24.0_2. On February 6th. curl-7.29.0
was released. Is there any possibility that this port might be updated.
A lot of imap support was added to this version. The 7.24 version was
released over a year ago (01/24/12).
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get
that won't compile. I
originally found 5 of them, but by contacting the maintainers, the
problems were rectified.
As a side note, I don't understand why the base system hasn't been
updated. It would certainly help to eliminate problems like this.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list
?
just one another way to control people.
Control people? How do they control people?
Don't encourage him Lee. You will only receive convoluted verbiage for
your trouble. Unfortunately, there is a small but vocal group that
suffers from Neophobia. There is no known cure.
--
Jerry
the same IP I believe.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
had
excellent results which is why I usually delegate my PDF work to
Windows.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 11:33:06 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar articulated:
PDF wasn't designed for editing from the first place. But Adobe
decided to f..k up their own standard and added extensions to create
PDF with forms.
*Citation needed
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list
to update the ports version?
Thanks!
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports
}. Check out its 'man'
page. It is a very useful tool for checking 'Makefiles' in the ports
system.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
details. In the case
of Postfix, you can have your clients disable the use of port 587. It
should work until a proper fix is issued.
And yes, there is a PR against this port.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
bug or not. I was
forced to remove the bash-devel port and revert to the bash port in
order to allow the builds to continue.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
to the port version?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
port installed at the time. I am not sure if it was that
actual port or one in the chain though.
If I had a test machine available, I would change the bash port and
then try building the x11/kde4-runtime port. However, since I don't, it
will just have to wait.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 21:03:07 + (UTC)
Michael Grimm articulated:
Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
I updated openssl on my system and ran into this bug:
As noted numerous times on the openssl-dev list, OpenSSL 1.0.1d is
broken. You need to grab
http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p
I just updated to KDE Version 4.9.5 as described in the UPDATING file.
KDE starts; however, all of my desktop icon and shortcuts are gone.
What could have happened to them? Also, the ALT TAB key
combination no longer functions.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies
or how it effected the operation of the application, it would prove
beneficial to the end use. Just my 2¢ on the matter.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
unless I have a specific reason for
doing so.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports
would have no problem
with creating a new port for the 4.x branch, although you might want to
keep the 3.x branch in the ports system for awhile.
Just my 2¢.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
Presently net/remmina is at version 0.9.3 in the ports system.
According to the projects web site, Remmina 1.0 was released February
11, 2012. Is there any possibility of having the ports version updated
to this release? The present version is nearly a year old.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list
for suggestions or even better patches/PRs!
+1
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports
to
download all available patches and update bash. I don't know how this
would be handles, but it might eliminate some of the rather long waits
between releases in the ports system.
Well, that is my 2¢ on the matter.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored
tool.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 15:12:00 -0500
Glen Barber articulated:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 06:15:45AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 08:32:49AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
Bash is currently at Bash-Release: 4.2, patch level 42. The port's
version is only at patch level 37, which
On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 12:18:11 +0100
Koop Mast articulated:
On 5-1-2013 2:17, Adriaan de Groot wrote:
On Friday, January 04, 2013 07:24:28 PM Jerry wrote:
Following the directions in UPDATING, I used the following command:
portupgrade -fr devel/libical
That port updated correctly
reason for the build failure. I tried it three
times including doing a distclean and updating the ports tree.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
if the port version might be updated and if there is
any intention to make a port version for the 7 alpha branch?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
Bash is currently at Bash-Release: 4.2, patch level 42. The port's
version is only at patch level 37, which was released on 16-Jul-2012.
This is an important port and since the freeze is over with, I was
wondering if this port will be updated?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 09:04:30 -0600
Corey Halpin articulated:
On 2013-01-03, Jerry wrote:
Fetchmail was recently updated to version: 6.3.24. The port
version is 6.3.22. The new version fixs some regressions and plug
the OpenSSL memory leak.
A patch was submitted to update to 6.3.24
I was not able to find the application automx
http://www.automx.org/en/ in the ports system. Does anyone know if it
is listed under a different name or if someone is working on a possible
port of this application?
Thanks!
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get
, considering it is a holiday I really would not expect to
get any feedback until later this week anyway.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
if the port maintainer
has an interest in this port any longer. It is a major port and really
deserves to have a maintainer who has both the time and desire to keep
it current.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
Windows and have it
access the files I wanted to work with on my FreeBSD machine quite
nicely. Evidently I will not be requiring a FreeBSD version after all.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
experience with this software or
specific information on it?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
Every solution breeds new problems
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:32:57 +0100
Frank Staals articulated:
Jerry je...@seibercom.net writes:
I was asked about the feasibility of setting up Dropbox
https://www.dropbox.com/install?os=lnx on a FreeBSD machine,
specifically under KDE if possible. I found three references to
Dropbox
The current Bash-4.2 in the ports is only current to patch level 37.
Now that the port freeze is over, can the port be updated to level 39
which is the current level?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
and rebuild any dependencies. It is my preferred
solution.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 05:30:06 -0800
Beech Rintoul articulated:
On 10/1/2012 11:56 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
01.10.2012 21:33, Jerry wrote:
I just finished installing linux-f10-flashplugin-11.2r202.238.
For some inexplicable reason, it is no longer working. I followed
the directions
of replacing it, it is a matter of making it work.
It works fine on Windows and Ubuntu and from what I have been told,
most other flavors of Linux. Therefore it doesn't take a frigging
Einstein to deduce where the problem lies. Of course, it is always
easier to blame the other guy.
--
Jerry
nothing is listed in the directory and
flash still doesn't work. Every time I reach a page that requires flash,
I am greeted with a message telling me I need to download and install
it.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 16:06:53 -0300
marcos alves articulated:
2012/10/1 marcos alves noid...@gmail.com
2012/10/1 Jerry je...@seibercom.net
I just finished installing linux-f10-flashplugin-11.2r202.238.
For some inexplicable reason, it is no longer working. I followed
the directions
asks, Why do you use Microsoft instead of
open-source software, you can point to crap like this being an
excellent reason. IMHO, the only reason for crap like this is because
it is easier to ignore the problem than fix it.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored
dependencies in my vocabulary.
Nor does it indicate, or at least not to me anyway, that you
actually rebuilt all required run or build dependencies. Sorry about
the misunderstanding. I'll leave you to figure out the problem yourself.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get
thinking and not chain ourselves to the past.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
TLC announced that Honey Boo Boo will have a Halloween special
of that automatically for you
and provide you with a log file should something not work as expected.
Just a thought.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
is not installed.
My question is why would or should I downgrade my present installation
of to libotr-3.2.1 to update kdenetwork-4.8.3_1 to
kdenetwork-4.8.3_2 when libotr-4.0.0 apparently works fine with the
older version? It just doesn't seem to make any sense. Is this a bug in
the make routine.
--
Jerry
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 18:56:22 +0100
Chris Rees articulated:
On 22 September 2012 15:22, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 08:43:29 -0400
Steve Wills articulated:
Please see the 20120908 entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING.
Been there, done that, doesn't make any difference
as
narrow minded as that. Imagine if we all hated people simple because of
their skin color or religion ... or do we?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
(MYSQL, PGSQL or
SQLITE)
Hope then is is more clear.
.if $(.CURDIR:M*/www/apache22)
APACHE22_WITH_BDB_VER=48
WITH_EXPERIMENTAL_PATCHES=yes
.endif
How would I specify it now with the new framework?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do
the program to run. The
sysutils/k3b-kde4 port might also have the same limitation. I have not
actually checked it out.
Is there any specific reason why the port(s) cannot build with the
sysutils/cdrtools-devel port?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do
should
be the one making the final decision, not some megalomaniac like Doug
who feels his opinions are the only ones that count.
By the way, I just noticed that openssl-1.0.1_3 has been updated to
openssl-1.0.3_4. I wonder if the maintainer asked Doug's permission
first.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
Doug Barton articulated:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:14:25 -0700
Doug Barton articulated:
On 07/25/2012 08:03, Michael wrote:
Hello obrien,
Any plans to update bash-4.2.28 up to patch level 037
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 15:42:38 -0700
Doug Barton articulated:
Umm ... wow. I'll try to respond substantively below.
On 07/29/2012 04:46, Jerry wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
Doug Barton articulated:
Completely aside from my being thoroughly impressed with your
mind
reveal anything?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
The English have no respect for their language, and will not teach
their children to speak
for no apparent reason and usually at the most
in-opportunistic times.
By the way, does which python reveal anything?
What's RR? rock-n-roll?..
Removal re-instillation.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
: No such file or directory
*** Error code 127
Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod/work/fuse4bsd-498acaef33b0/doc.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod.
Script done on Mon Jul 23 09:57:39 2012
Has anyone else experienced this problem or have a solution?
--
Jerry
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:26:06 -0400
Jason E. Hale articulated:
On Monday, July 23, 2012 10:08:18 Jerry wrote:
System: FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE
I am unable to build the sysutils/fusefs-kmod port. This is the
build log:
Script started on Mon Jul 23 09:57:32 2012
--snip--
env RUBYLIB
.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
I was wondering if anyone had actually attempted to compile mplayer2
http://www.mplayer2.org/ on FreeBSD or if there was someone working
on porting it?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 12:00:20 -0500
Zhihao Yuan articulated:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
I was wondering if anyone had actually attempted to compile mplayer2
http://www.mplayer2.org/ on FreeBSD or if there was someone
working on porting it?
I'm using
Is there anyone working on porting KDE Partition Manager
https://sourceforge.net/projects/partitionman/, or Parted Magic
https://sourceforge.net/projects/partedmagic/?source=recommended to
FreeBSD?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 21:01:31 -0500
Matthew D. Fuller articulated:
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 09:36:11AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Jerry, and lo! it spake thus:
I just did a quick perusal of the Sourceforge site
https://sourceforge.net/projects/openjade/files/ and it appears
/textproc/openjade.
The entire build log can be view at: http://pastebin.com/4hxS2ZQL
Has anyone else experienced this phenomenon after updating the Perl
port?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 08:22:30 -0400
Michael Scheidell articulated:
On 7/4/12 8:05 AM, Jerry wrote:
Has anyone else experienced this phenomenon after updating the Perl
port?
yes, for years and years.
if you update perl, from something that is working to the new
version, you will always see
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 08:22:30 -0400
Michael Scheidell articulated:
On 7/4/12 8:05 AM, Jerry wrote:
Has anyone else experienced this phenomenon after updating the Perl
port?
but, then again, openjade might just not be compatible with perl5.16,
which is also a possibility, and you won't get
The multimedia/linux-realplayer port has been marked
BROKEN=unfetchable for awhile now. Has there been any movement on a
resolution for this problem.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
/local/lib /usr/local/bin/cmake
-E
cmake_progress_report
/usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-ruby-korundum/work/korundum-4.8.4/CMakeFiles
4 5 6 [ 67%] Built target korundum4 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-ruby-korundum.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off
that at some future point that base could prove profitable.
Once jettisoned, it would be hard to reacquire. Basic business 101.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
Skype 4.0 for Linux is now available. Is there any possibility of
getting it ported to FreeBSD? The latest version in ports is only
2.x.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:12:58 +0100
Chris Rees articulated:
On 15 June 2012 18:53, Etienne Robillard animelo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/15/2012 01:08 PM, Jerry wrote:
Skype 4.0 for Linux is now available. Is there any possibility of
getting it ported to FreeBSD? The latest version in ports
succeeds index (index has 39016)
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports
not depend
on tools like portmaster?
I for one would certainly hope that it didn't.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
I haven't lost my mind; I
for the first time.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 17:34:59 +0100
Chris Rees articulated:
On Jun 2, 2012 5:27 PM, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jun 2012 11:07:28 -0400
b. f. articulated:
Realy no other possibility?!
You need to rebuild all the ports that install binaries that link
against
will need to make some manual changes to the file yourself.
Pathetically, we are still forced to play games to get a simple sound
card to work while everyone else does it automatically.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply
:
/usr/ports/lang/php5-extensions. Be sure to run make config in the
port prior to installing it. That also applies to the php5-5.3.13
port: /usr/ports/lang/php5, especially if you need support for
Apache. It is not built by default.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies
if that would work for you or not.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
The Wright Brothers weren't the first to fly, they were just the first
-0449e52.tar.gz
)etch: invalid size ( 99819 = Couldn't fetch it - please try to
retrieve this = port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again.
*** Error code 1
Attempting to fetch the file manually only results in this file being
found: pkgtools-pkgtools-2.4.9.4-0-g0449e52.tar.gz
--
Jerry
all this time is a mark of it's worth.
I totally agree. While I do use portupgrade from time to time,
portmanager seems to fix problems that portupgrade can't and that
portmaster just makes worse. Plus, portmanager is much faster than
portmaster
Then again, that is just my 2¢.
--
Jerry
reconfigured the Samba
port to not build with it and then rebuilt the port.
Personally, I believe that WINBINDD should be OFF by default;
however, it is easy enough to configure the port not to build with it.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do
you installed to get samba to install in the first
place first. While you are at it, move your /etc/make.conf file out of
the way and have the port build with a truly empty file.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
plain not able to be fetched, then it should be removed from the
port system. There is no upside to keeping ports that will not build,
or cannot be fetched.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
-devel-2.99.4 version is really not
the latest experimental version any longer, shouldn't it be removed to
avoid any confusion?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 07:43:32 -0400
Robert Huff articulated:
Jerry writes:
GnuTLS v3.0.18 was released on 2012-04-02. The latest port's
versions are gnutls-2.12.18 and gnutls-devel-2.99.4
respectively.
GnuTLS v3.0.18 is considered the latest stable build by the
authors
101 - 200 of 437 matches
Mail list logo
