LogJam exploit can force TLS down to 512 bytes, does it affect us? ?

2015-05-20 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi secur...@freebsd.org (& bcc'd a couple of friends) Refa: http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-32814309 (posted 5 hours before Wed May 20 23:01:22 CEST 2015) http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/05/20/logjam_impact/ 20 May 2015 at 16:29 Does it affect FreeBSD ? If so, I guess securi

Re: distfile recovered for ports/audio/cd2mp3

2015-05-19 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, Reference: > From: "Chris H" > Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 00:43:20 -0700 "Chris H" wrote: > On Mon, 18 May 2015 16:23:30 +0200 "Julian H. Stacey" wrote > > > Hi m...@foster.cc as MAINTAINER= of current/ports/audio/cd2mp3 > &g

distfile recovered for ports/audio/cd2mp3

2015-05-18 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi m...@foster.cc as MAINTAINER= of current/ports/audio/cd2mp3 ===> cd2mp3-0.82_4,1 is marked as broken: Fails to fetch. Here is a temporary copy of distfile http://www.berklix.com/ftp/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/cd2mp3-0.82.tar.gz Please copy it somewhere & remove BROKEN= , It is just 3.5K ! Thanks.

Re: comms/seyon distfile recovered

2015-05-08 Thread Julian H. Stacey
> From: Jan Beich > Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 04:11:26 +0200 Jan Beich wrote: > --=-=-= > Content-Type: text/plain > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > "Julian H. Stacey" writes: > > > lini...@freebsd.org wrote: > > Su

graphics/epdfview distfile recovered

2015-05-07 Thread Julian H. Stacey
lini...@freebsd.org wrote: cc'd chinsan...@gmail.com as original creator of Makefile as MAINTAINER= ports@ > As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in > portname: graphics/epdfview > broken because: No public distfiles > build errors: none. > overvie

comms/seyon distfile recovered

2015-05-07 Thread Julian H. Stacey
lini...@freebsd.org wrote: Subject:Re: FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken I added cc: m...@freebsd.org FYI as creator of Makefile > As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in > portname: comms/seyon > broken because: Unfetchabl

Re: distfile found for deleted port sysutils/jailutils

2015-04-26 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, Reference: > From: "Julian H. Stacey" > Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 17:27:16 +0200 "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: > Hi ports@ as ex MAINTAINER= of syutils/jailutils > > portupgrade on my 10.1-RELEASE reported syutils/jailutils > was deleted as n

distfile found for deleted port sysutils/jailutils

2015-04-26 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi ports@ as ex MAINTAINER= of syutils/jailutils portupgrade on my 10.1-RELEASE reported syutils/jailutils was deleted as no Distfile. I have 93248 Dec 9 2004 ./4.11-RELEASE/jailutils-1.0.tar.gz 94118 Sep 3 2008 ./6.4-RELEASE/jailutils-1.3.tar.gz 98976 Aug 26 2009 ./10

current/ports/security/nss (fwd)

2015-03-27 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi po...@freebsd.org current/ports/security/nss is broken. How to fix it ? PS I first asked via Makefile MAINTAINER= address freebsd-ge...@freebsd.org but no reply, (list swamped in noise from freebsd.org robots). http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gecko/2015-March/005233.html To: ge...

Re: how to make a port of ex-FreeBSD code...

2015-02-12 Thread Julian H. Stacey
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 03:31:54PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > Chris H wrote this message on Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 15:08 -0800: > > > On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 14:21:28 -0800 John-Mark Gurney = > wrote > > >=20 > > > > Hello, > > > >=20 > > > > I'm going to be removing bdes (and possibly enigma)

Fund a FreeBSD manager maybe ? Was: BIND REPLACE_BASE option

2015-02-06 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Michelle Sullivan wrote: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:30:59 +0100 > Matt Smith wrote: > > On Jan 14 12:15, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > >> > >> Well, like I said, REPLACE_BASE was an abomination that should never > >> have > >> existed, now that it's gone, it'll never get back, and you'll never > >> see it > >>

Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option

2015-01-11 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, Reference: > From: The BSD Dreamer > Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 21:25:11 -0600 The BSD Dreamer wrote: > > On 2015-01-09 07:42, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > +--On 8 janvier 2015 19:44:09 -0800 Doug Barton wrote: > > | Can you please explain why this option was removed? It's been in

current svn_revision 376454 ports/security/nss break

2015-01-08 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi ge...@freebsd.org & po...@freebsd.org, (previously no copy to ports@ just gecko@ Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:32:31 +0100) ports/security/nss has been failing to compile a couple of weeks now, I'm on current ports svn_revision 376454 here, anyone else noticed ? various other ports depend on it. .

Re: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ Attic URLs, eg for ports/mail/demime ?

2014-12-29 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi Olli cc ports@ olli hauer wrote Mon, 29 Dec 2014 21:43:43 +0100 : > On 2014-12-29 17:19, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > olli hauer wrote Sat, 27 Dec 2014 08:25:09 +0100: > > > >> On 2014-12-27 03:30, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > >>> Hi ports@ > >

Re: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ Attic URLs, eg for ports/mail/demime ?

2014-12-29 Thread Julian H. Stacey
olli hauer wrote Sat, 27 Dec 2014 08:25:09 +0100: > On 2014-12-27 03:30, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Hi ports@ > > What URL(s) do I need under > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ > > to get to the Attic for last copy of eg ports/mail/demime ? > > > > How is

https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ Attic URLs, eg for ports/mail/demime ?

2014-12-26 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi ports@ What URL(s) do I need under https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ to get to the Attic for last copy of eg ports/mail/demime ? How is one supposed to find URLs /svn rev nos ? (I have a local svn if it helps, but was looking on web) demime was removed after release date 2012-01 of 9.0.0 https://sv

pkg obstructed make install & delete, + pkg delete regression.

2014-12-23 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi ports@, pkg + sqlite was causing trouble with my 11-current src/ & ports/, The problem is still there in generic FreeBSD & needs fixing I believe, though I managed to dig my way out here marked at I had a perl mess, & could neither delete old or install new perl ! I wanted to eithe

Re: current ports/converters/recode missing / wrong recode-3.6.tar.gz

2014-12-19 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, Reference: > From: Dmitry Sivachenko > Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 13:06:45 +0300 Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: > > > On 18 дек. 2014 г., at 21:16, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > > Hi de...@freebsd.org Maintainer of ports/converters/recode > &

Re: current ports/converters/recode missing / wrong recode-3.6.tar.gz

2014-12-18 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > with svn_revision 374898 > > > > distinfo has: > > SHA256 (recode-3.6.tar.gz) = > > a9beecec22be42b1096de74d4dfb1051fa9cd252e4ae149d8aa6b5243d729e5e > > SIZE (recode-3.6.tar.gz) = 1760172 > > > > Which I cant find, so I used: > > Hmm, I tried to fetch it, works f

current ports/converters/recode missing / wrong recode-3.6.tar.gz

2014-12-18 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi de...@freebsd.org Maintainer of ports/converters/recode with svn_revision 374898 distinfo has: SHA256 (recode-3.6.tar.gz) = a9beecec22be42b1096de74d4dfb1051fa9cd252e4ae149d8aa6b5243d729e5e SIZE (recode-3.6.tar.gz) = 1760172 Which I cant find, so I used: SHA256 (recode-3.6.tar.gz) = e3e6a4f3

Re: Any tool known to demangle special chars in MS tree path names ?

2014-12-09 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > Hi ports@ > > Is there a utility in ports/ to automatically clean disgusting path > > names in big trees one acquires from Microsoft users ? > > > > Trees with in both dir

Any tool known to demangle special chars in MS tree path names ?

2014-12-08 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi ports@ Is there a utility in ports/ to automatically clean disgusting path names in big trees one acquires from Microsoft users ? Trees with in both directories & filenames, masses of meta characters such as as ' ` . * | \ & space (& accents & high parity bit national extensions eg german umlau

Re: print/acroread9 Adobe Reader

2014-10-28 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > > > > > > http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/FreeBSD/ports/jhs/print/Makefile.local > > > > & other parallel ../*/Ma

Re: print/acroread9 Adobe Reader

2014-10-28 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Kevin Oberman wrote: > > http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/FreeBSD/ports/jhs/print/Makefile.local > > & other parallel ../*/Makefile.local , & a few more notes if one scrolls > > down > > to "pdf doc viewing notes" in > > http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/bin/.csh/syntax > > > Can't

Re: print/acroread9 Adobe Reader

2014-10-28 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Guido Falsi wrote: > On 10/28/14 15:22, Russell L. Carter wrote: > > Hi Julian, > > > > On 10/28/14 07:00, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > >> Hi h...@freebsd.org & po...@freebsd.org > > > >> I went to install print/acror

Re: print/acroread9 Adobe Reader

2014-10-28 Thread Julian H. Stacey
"Russell L. Carter" wrote: > Hi Julian, > > On 10/28/14 07:00, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Hi h...@freebsd.org & po...@freebsd.org > > > > I went to install print/acroread9 for current & found it was not in > > ports/. > > > > [..

print/acroread9 Adobe Reader

2014-10-28 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi h...@freebsd.org & po...@freebsd.org I went to install print/acroread9 for current & found it was not in ports/. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/MOVED?revision=371318&view=markup#l6509 print/acroread9||2014-08-30|Deprecated: many security issues are reported and Adobe no longer acti

Re: Adding an "only-free" option to the ports system

2014-10-20 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Martin Hanson > wrote: > > Hi > > > > This is a suggestion. > > > > Would it not be possible to add a feature to the ports system which > > enables the user to choose to avoid non Open Source ports? > > > > The feature already exists, see /us

ports/ make fetch Mk/ failures

2014-09-22 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi po...@freebsd.org, For later local builds of releases, & as some distfiles disappear, I do: uname -r # 9.3-RELEASE cd /pri/FreeBSD/branches/amd64/-current/ports; setenv PORTSDIR `pwd` make -j 3 -k fetch BATCH=YES# Or make checksum Some ports always fail, fetch depen

Re: [FreeBSD-Ports-Announce] Happy 20th birthday FreeBSD ports tree!

2014-08-21 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Reference: > From: Frederic Culot > Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 07:06:46 +0200 Hi, Frederic Culot wrote: > [1] http://youtu.be/LiFq5D-zmBs There's no sound ! I thought my sound had failed, but as a test there Is sound on adjacent unrelated: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DR

Re: how to set proxy after building textproc/gnome-translate ?

2014-06-10 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi freebsd-gn...@freebsd.org I'm not on freebsd-gnome@ (just on ports@) I discovered freebsd-gnome@ after the mail below to ports@ bounced on Cc: to author Jean-Yves Lefort I then found Jean-Yves in FreeBSD GNOME alumni (with no address) on http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/contact.html Copy of my o

how to set proxy after building textproc/gnome-translate ?

2014-06-10 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi ports@ textproc/gnome-translate/Makefile MAINTAINER=ports Anyone know how to set gnome-translate to talk to the proxy ? (I'm not running gnome as wm but fvwm2, so rather reluctant to need to dig for some gnome proxy manager) (my proxy works fine for various clients inc. firefox, epiphany & o

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD bug tracking moves from GNATS to Bugzilla

2014-06-03 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 3 June 2014 10:11, John Marino wrote: > > ... it's doubtful most folks unwilling to register are > > about to make a meaningful report... > > This is *not* the reason for registation. > > The reason for registation is that we know from experience that having > a way t

ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk Verifying install for - to call REinstall

2014-05-18 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi po...@freebsd.org While making my standard collection of ports on 8.4-RELEASE (yes I also have 9.2 & 10 on other partitions on some but not all hosts) I saw numerous examples similar to: cd /usr/ports/multimedia/ogmrip ; make ===> ogmrip-1.0.0 depends on executable: mencoder - found ===> og

Re: ACTION REQUIRED - Unstaged Ports being DEPRECATED on June 31st.

2014-05-10 Thread Julian H. Stacey
> On 5/10/2014 10:33 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > > You are receiving this mail as it affects FreeBSD ports that you maintain. > You can see the full list here: > http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/notstaged.txt Hi, Suggestion: a CGI script with approx.: cd /pub/FreeBSD/branches/-current/ports find

Re: [FreeBSD-Ports-Announce] Time to bid farewell to the old pkg_ tools

2014-02-08 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Michel Talon wrote: > So > how to interact with local.sqlite? Thanks Michel, Noted. Would you please consider running send-pr to submit that for man 5 ? Prepending EXAMPLES Appending SEE ALSO pkg(8) There is no src/share/man/man5/local.sqlite.5 in both 10.0-RELEASE & branches/-cur

Re: [FreeBSD-Ports-Announce] Time to bid farewell to the old pkg_ tools

2014-02-06 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Michel Talon wrote: > > --Apple-Mail=_102D913B-49CA-4129-972A-758AABCAA293 > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="Apple-Mail=_16E0BC5A-FE3D-444D-8437-47827626590A" > > > --Apple-Mail=_16E0BC5A-FE3D-444D-8437-47827626590A > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Content-T

Re: [FreeBSD-Ports-Announce] Time to bid farewell to the old pkg_ tools

2014-02-05 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 03/02/2014 21:24, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > >> be beneficial in a very short amount of time. Even if you prefer to > >> compile from source, > >=20 > > I use source, rarely if ever use packages, (except pkg_delete > > to remove old

Re: [FreeBSD-Ports-Announce] Time to bid farewell to the old pkg_ tools

2014-02-03 Thread Julian H. Stacey
> be beneficial in a very short amount of time. Even if you prefer to > compile from source, I use source, rarely if ever use packages, (except pkg_delete to remove old broken dependencies). No opinion which scrips are better. > you will still reap the benefits of the modern > packaging system.

Re: Problems with linking on FreeBSD-10

2014-01-31 Thread Julian H. Stacey
> The failure is when using FreeBSD-10. With FreeBSD-8 it works great. I Building ports on 10.0-RELEASE is lots more trouble than 9.2-RELEASE. 10.0-RELEASE built 874, & 9.2-RELEASE built 953 & still making, with http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/freebsd/ports/jhs/*/Makefile.local cd

Re: ports/math/hexcalc restored from 8.2 now runs on 9.1 & 9.2 & 10.0

2014-01-30 Thread Julian H. Stacey
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Ladan?= wrote: > 2014-01-30 Julian H. Stacey : > > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Ladan?= wrote: > >> 2014-01-30 Kevin Oberman : > >> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Julian H. Stacey > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> >

Re: ports/math/hexcalc restored from 8.2 now runs on 9.1 & 9.2 & 10.0

2014-01-30 Thread Julian H. Stacey
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Ladan?= wrote: > 2014-01-30 Kevin Oberman : > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > >> Hi ports@ > >> I changed Subject: > >> From: > >> Re: How to find removed ports in general & math/hex

ports/math/hexcalc restored from 8.2 now runs on 9.1 & 9.2 & 10.0

2014-01-29 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi ports@ I changed Subject: From: Re: How to find removed ports in general & math/hexcalc in particular. To: ports/math/hexcalc restored from 8.2 now runs on 9.1 & 9.2 & 10.0 + cc'd FYI Maintainer of x11/xcalc (a scientific not hexadecimal calculator) > grep hexcalc /usr/ports/MOVED > ma

Re: How to find removed ports in general & math/hexcalc in particular.

2014-01-28 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Dimitry Andric wrote: > > --Apple-Mail=_442D467F-1929-40CE-90B7-0CAD6B1BC540 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset=us-ascii > > On 28 Jan 2014, at 16:28, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Hi po...@freebsd.org > > I&#x

How to find removed ports in general & math/hexcalc in particular.

2014-01-28 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi po...@freebsd.org I'm looking for ports/math/hexcalc or replacement it dissapeared after 8.2-RELEASE, it's not in http://www.freebsd.org/ports/math.html How should one find: Why it dissapeared ? (eg maybe it just lacked a maintainer & I have to re-port it? Or ... ? What to replace

Re: Anyone looked at making a port for https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere ?

2013-11-10 Thread Julian H. Stacey
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 02:34:00PM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Has anyone looked at making a ports wrapper for > > https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere ? > > > > Sources: https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere/development > > > > PS on current/por

Anyone looked at making a port for https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere ?

2013-11-07 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Has anyone looked at making a ports wrapper for https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere ? Sources: https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere/development PS on current/ports, grep https-everywhere shows nothing, grep www.eff.org shows just security/switzerland/, port creator Alexey Dokuchaev added to C

Re: ports/editors/libreoffice does not build on 10-CURRENT

2013-10-22 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi Matthias, cc list Re your > > /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-4.0.5.2/bridges/source/cpp_uno/gcc3_linux_intel/callvirtualmethod.cxx: ... > but it dumps core on start; gdb bt is attached; > > matthias By chance I just built libreoffice & mine starts OK, src=10.0-BETA1 p

Re: lyx 2.0.6

2013-10-17 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, Reference: > From: Ajtim > Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 06:39:15 -0400 Ajtim wrote: > My system: FreeBSD 10.0-BETA1 > When I built print/lyx I got: > fatal error: too many errors emitted, stopping now [-ferror-limit=] Mine on 10.0-BETA1: 6 errors generated. As ports/print

Re: Update to release 11.0 and stage support for nzbget

2013-10-05 Thread Julian H. Stacey
> I have attached to this email a patch that update the nzbget port to > release 11.0 and add support for staging. > > My work is based on https://wiki.freebsd.org/ports/StageDir but this is > the first time I modify a port file, so any comments are welcome. > > Nicolas Hi, Use send-pr so your

Re: Suggesting a new experimental fork for ports tree

2013-06-13 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, Reference: > From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Jo=BEe_Zobec?= > Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 20:04:30 +0200 > Apart from the maintainer of the port, there would also be "sub" > maintainerswhich would be those people who helped patch the port into the > good shape: > > # make -C /usr/ports/sec

Re: error on fvwm startup on 9.1-RELEASE

2013-05-14 Thread Julian H. Stacey
> From: dirk.me...@dinoex.sub.org (Dirk Meyer) > Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 21:38:53 +0200 > Hallo Julian H. Stacey, Hi Dirk, Thanks for looking, to keep others if any in the loop, I restored cc: po...@freebsd.org > > I asked din...@freebsd.org (cc'd) the fo

Re: error on fvwm startup on 9.1-RELEASE

2013-05-13 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi po...@freebsd.org I asked din...@freebsd.org (cc'd) the following a month back, but seen no reply, (maybe he's busy or away, or a spam filter ate it), so does anyone else have ideas ? Thanks. The 2 .png I removed from MIME in previous mail & put here for ports@ list: http://berklix.com/~jhs

Re: WANTED: Tool to verify installed package/port consistancy

2013-05-10 Thread Julian H. Stacey
"Ronald F. Guilmette" wrote: > > The subject line pretty much says it all. Additional to other ideas so far, You could also make a chroot, install normal bins from src, install all your ports, ^D to exit chroot, then do a compare & strip with eg: cd chroot ; find . -type f -exec cmpd -d {} / \;

Re: MAINTAINER lines and Real Names

2012-09-13 Thread Julian H. Stacey
> I see the proposal less about *FreeBSD Ports Teams* and more about > *Non-FreeBSD* groups. We can only blame ourselves for having > non-responsive teams, or having *mailing lists* be maintainers. > > I see the benefit here more about allowing us to commit PR from any of > the listed addresses, a

Re: MAINTAINER lines and Real Names

2012-09-13 Thread Julian H. Stacey
> they have the much more pleasant and personal style; > I have > prepared a patch ... > As a nice extra, it would also on the surface support multiple > maintainers and make maintainer would still only return the first > match. Sounds good. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix L

Re: Can we please just remove the old Makefile headers?

2012-08-27 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Eitan Adler wrote: > On 27 August 2012 08:40, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > On various other older ports, when I couldnt get response in time > > from MAINTAINER (I don't mean re hylafax), perhaps maintainer on > > holiday, & I couldn't wait for send-pr tie

Re: Can we please just remove the old Makefile headers?

2012-08-27 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, Reference: > From: Bryan Drewery > Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 08:02:15 -0500 > Message-id: <503b6fd7.4060...@shatow.net> Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 8/27/2012 7:40 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Brooks Davis wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012

Re: Can we please just remove the old Makefile headers?

2012-08-27 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Brooks Davis wrote: > On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 02:02:47PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > The old Makefile headers, ala: > >=20 > > # New ports collection makefile for:BIND 9.9.x > > # Date created: 27 January 2012 > > # Whom: dougb > > # > >

Re: [FreeBSD-Ports-Announce] [HEADS UP] Ports tree has been migrated to Subversion

2012-07-16 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi Thomas, > Before committing please read the Ports Subversion Primer, > http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsSubversionPrimer. Please feel to add > missing parts of fix it if something is wrong. There is no match for "svn" & "subversion" in http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/han

European court allows software licence resale, & blocks PD capture ?

2012-07-03 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi s...@guug.de & po...@freebsd.org I set Reply-To: "Julian H. Stacey" To avoid cross posts between: Responders in German wanting s...@guug.de http://lists.guug.de/pipermail/sage/ Responders in English wanting

Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken

2012-06-21 Thread Julian H. Stacey
lini...@freebsd.org wrote: > As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in > the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports Hi all, Reports should be ordered to draw the interest of readers, these aren't yet. Probably: Many readers on ports@ often delete thes

Re: Mk macros & print/texinfo/distinfo variant SHA256 SIZE

2012-06-15 Thread Julian H. Stacey
> current Mk/bsd.port.mk has > # DISABLE_SIZE - Do not check the size of a distfile even if the SIZE field > # has been specified in distinfo. This is useful > # when using an alternate FETCH_CMD. PS: It's a port wide variable, not for individual files. Used here:

Mk macros & print/texinfo/distinfo variant SHA256 SIZE

2012-06-15 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi joh...@freebsd.org & cc ports@ A 9.0-RELEASE ports fails on cd print/texinfo ; make fetch unless one imports newer values from current, (as I did in my http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/FreeBSD/ports/gen/print/texinfo/distinfo.REL=ALL.diff ) But periodicaly patching distinfo with

Add CONFLICTS_INSTALL=fusefs-ntfs to sysutils/ntfsprogs/Makefile

2012-06-13 Thread Julian H. Stacey
>Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator:Julian H. Stacey >Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Linux Unix Consultancy, Munich/Muenchen. >Confidential: no >Synopsis: Add CONFLICTS_INSTALL=fusefs-ntfs to sysutils/ntfsprogs/Makefile >Severity: non-critical &

Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th

2012-04-10 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Doug Barton wrote: > On 04/09/2012 15:21, Da Rock wrote: > > To stick my nose where it probably doesn't belong: indeed. This is one > > area where linux annoys the most for that very reason. > > > > Let the user decide and bear the responsibility. > > If you want to put up a server with all the e

Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th

2012-04-10 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, Mark Linimon wrote: > On 9 April 2012 17:49, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > >> portmgr's policy is to honor removal requests, no matter the circumstances. > > > > > > > >

Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th

2012-04-10 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Boris Samorodov wrote: > On 10.04.2012 16:34, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > Maintainer of mail/imaptools (Boris) is welcome to add me to a list of > > witnesses: > > Thanks for your help but there is no need at the particular case. > The port was fixed yesterday and

Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th

2012-04-10 Thread Julian H. Stacey
\ -> \ http://ftp7.freebsd.org/sites/ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/imap_tools_V1.135.tar.gz\ Julian H. Stacey:\ http://berklix.com/~jhs/contact/:\ Tue Apr 10 14:30:17 CEST 2012 Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C

Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th

2012-04-10 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Mikhail Tsatsenko wrote: > On 08.04.2012 05:25, Mark Linimon wrote: > > portmgr's policy is to honor removal requests, no matter the circumstances. > > If someone wants to fork the last free release and host it somewhere, I > > would be less concerned in that case. > > > > mcl > I'd like to create

Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th

2012-04-09 Thread Julian H. Stacey
> From: Chris Rees > > Well, whatever he says, he can't revoke the license of what's already > been distributed. > > > # Copyright (c) 2008 Rick Sanders # > #

Re: Strange issues while upgrading ports

2011-11-25 Thread Julian H. Stacey
lain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > On 11/25/2011 02:51 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Kaya Saman wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm running FreeBSD version 8.0 x64 edition on my server with multiple > >> jails.

Re: Strange issues while upgrading ports

2011-11-25 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Kaya Saman wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running FreeBSD version 8.0 x64 edition on my server with multiple > jails. < Detail deleted > > Can anyone help with my issues?? 8.0 is too old, November 2009 http://www.freebsd.org/releases/ 8.0 Is not supported. http://www.freebsd.org/security/security.html#

libtool is ignoring make.conf CFLAGS += -static

2011-10-26 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi ports@ libtool is not honouring the -static in my /etc/make.conf grep CFLAGS /etc/make.conf CFLAGS += -DJHSJHSX=JHSJHSX # Debug CFLAGS += -static # for /usr/ports/sysutils/ntfsprogs CFLAGS += -pipe # Not on hosts with little RAM CFLAGS += -stat

Re: sysutils/cfs

2011-09-13 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Matthias Andree wrote: > claim, please fix, until end 2011, in mail/procmail, in collaboration > with sunpoet@: Procmail works for me, for a friend, & others on list. It was & remains irresponsible to try to force satisfied users to fix other people's reported problems on threat of ports being ot

Re: ports-system priorities rant (Re: sysutils/cfs)

2011-09-13 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, Reference: > From: Chris Rees > Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:25:01 +0100 > Message-id: > Chris Rees wrote: > On 13 September 2011 18:54, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Hi, > > Reference: > >> From:         Chris Rees > >>

Re: ports-system priorities rant (Re: sysutils/cfs)

2011-09-13 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Chris Rees wrote: > On 12 September 2011 22:18, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Matthias Andree wrote: > >> >> An obscure piece of software is undesirable (and shouldn't be ported in > >> >> the first place). > >> > > >> > Bull

Re: ports-system priorities rant (Re: sysutils/cfs)

2011-09-13 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, Reference: > From: Chris Rees > Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:44:37 +0100 > Message-id: > Chris Rees wrote: > On 12 September 2011 22:18, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Matthias Andree wrote: > >> >> An obscure piece of software is und

Re: ports deprecations (was: sysutils/cfs)

2011-09-13 Thread Julian H. Stacey
> No, I won't tell you which window manager, because if I want to use it > again I don't want to discover that calling it to the minds of some of > the ports people caused it to be deleted. That summarises it. I too avoided mentioning a port for fear of the immature kids who destroy ports. At lea

Re: deprecated because: Development has ceased??? Maybe development is *complete*

2011-09-13 Thread Julian H. Stacey
> If the author of another package stated that maintenance ceased, that is > no longer the case. Any why let port users fall into this pit? They You advocate digging the pit. The hole where the ports was. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berkl

Re: Removed ports - looking from the bench

2011-09-13 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, Reference: > From: Doug Barton > Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 01:40:27 -0700 > Message-id: <4e6b227b.5050...@freebsd.org> Doug Barton wrote: > The way that the FreeBSD project handles deleted ports is to leave them > in the CVS repository, where they are easily available to eve

Re: ports-system priorities rant (Re: sysutils/cfs)

2011-09-13 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Matthias Andree wrote: > >> An obscure piece of software is undesirable (and shouldn't be ported in > >> the first place). > > > > Bullshit! > > I think that suffices. If the discussion is getting emotional, we > should stop it. No. You should stop advocating killing ports, or leave, or be revo

Re: sysutils/cfs

2011-09-13 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, > If not, see to backups and/or migration in due time. We can't possibly > support software that is unsupported by the vendor, but that's what We already do. Been working just fine for many years. No I wont tell you where, because I don't trust you & a few other irresponsible ports crusaders

Re: ports-system priorities rant (Re: sysutils/cfs)

2011-09-08 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 08.09.2011 16:15, schrieb Mikhail T.: > > > Having a poor port of an obscure > > piece of software is better, than no port at all. > > A poor port is undesirable (and shouldn't be in the tree in the first > place). Wrong. A `poor' port is is still a port else it woul

Re: sysutils/cfs

2011-09-08 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 08.09.2011 13:52, schrieb Matt Burke: > > I want machines, tools, to do as *I* say not the other way round, whether > > it's good for me or not. If I wanted nannying and interference, I'd install > > Ubuntu. > > No, you'd use a managed installation. Nobody stands the

Re: sysutils/cfs

2011-09-08 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 07.09.2011 17:53, schrieb Mikhail T.: > > > The policy -- up until fairly recently -- was to remove ports, that > > *fail to build* for a while. This made sense -- if the port remains > > unbuildable long enough, then, certainly, it is no longer in use. > > > > The /ne

Re: sysutils/cfs

2011-09-08 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, Reference: > From: Chris Rees > Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 07:20:27 +0100 > Message-id: > Chris Rees wrote: > --00151774047892f1af04ac680e7e > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On 8 Sep 2011 02:29, "Julian H. Stacey"

Re: sysutils/cfs

2011-09-07 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, Reference: > From: Doug Barton > Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 15:45:51 -0700 > Message-id: <4e67f41f.70...@freebsd.org> Doug Barton wrote: > On 9/7/2011 10:02 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > Doug Barton wrote: > >> On 09/07/2011 00:07, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > >>> D

Re: sysutils/cfs

2011-09-05 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Matthias Andree wrote: > So either Kostik, or you, or someone else steps up to maintain the port > at least to the extent that the known security bugs and reported bugs > get fixed, or to hell the port goes. Recent un-professional threats to throw out ports at un-necessarily short notice, with h

Re: sysutils/cfs

2011-09-05 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, Doug Barton wrote: > On 09/05/2011 02:33, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Chris Rees wrote: > >> On 4 September 2011 21:32, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Whoops, also missed a CVE -- buffer overflows can cause a DoS. > >>>> Ex

Re: sysutils/cfs

2011-09-05 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 10:32:30PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > It is not responsible to threaten to remove ports without warning > > between releases for non urgent reasons. > > portmgr has no such policy. > > Ports get deleted all the tim

Re: sysutils/cfs

2011-09-05 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Chris Rees wrote: > On 4 September 2011 21:32, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > >> > >> Whoops, also missed a CVE -- buffer overflows can cause a DoS. > >> Expiration date altered to 1 month accordingly. > > > > It is not responsible to threaten to remove port

Re: sysutils/cfs

2011-09-04 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, Reference: > From: Chris Rees > Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 20:21:10 +0100 > Message-id: > Chris Rees wrote: > On 4 September 2011 17:56, Chris Rees wrote: > > Guys, > > > > I've had to deprecate sysutils/cfs -- there's a confirmed issue with > > failing locks [1] which has

Re: x11-toolkits/tk84 install can't stat: /usr/local/man/man3/3DBorder.3

2011-09-04 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi m...@freebsd.org cc Ruslan & ports@ Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Julian H. Stacey wrote on 03.09.2011 15:38: > > Hi > > I see this error (on current too) > > cd /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/tk84 > > printenv > > PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/ga

Re: suggestion for pkgdb from ports-mgmt/portupgrade: add more explanation

2011-09-03 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > ... but I am a > non-native user of the English language). ... > Correct English is good, but but plain, simple and common English is better. Yes :-) (I'm native English, but in Germany). I also believe shorter sentences work better (in either language). Easy to forge

x11-toolkits/tk84 install can't stat: /usr/local/man/man3/3DBorder.3

2011-09-03 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi I see this error (on current too) cd /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/tk84 printenv PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/bin TERM=xterm PWD=/usr/ports uname -a FreeBSD blak.js.berklix.net 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #0: Thu May 19 13:49:29

Re: Ports system quality

2011-09-03 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 11:49:48AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Hi, > > Reference: > > > From: "Julian H. Stacey" =20 > > > Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 03:07:40 +0200=20 > > > Message-id:

Re: Ports system quality

2011-09-02 Thread Julian H. Stacey
> > No /pub/FreeBSD/branches/-current/ports/ports-mgmt/pkgin . > > I'm not familiar with pkgin, but nice to see OS co-operation. > > So, what do you actually mean by this? Re-read: ] Microsoft must grin at all us BSD, Linux, ] ... reinventing similar old ports shims for same old 3rd party

Re: Ports system quality

2011-09-02 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Hi, Reference: > From: "Julian H. Stacey" > Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 03:07:40 +0200 > Message-id: <201109020107.p8217efj089...@fire.js.berklix.net> I wrote: > Microsoft must grin at all us BSD, Linux, maybe Solaris & presumably > even no

Re: Ports system quality

2011-09-01 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Michal, Nice analogy ! > Nobody is really steering this ship anymore and it just happily > rams icebergs along the way, with volunteers occasionally throwing > buckets of water (and sometimes pieces of furniture) overboard to > somehow keep it afloat for a while longer. Furniture like sysutils/di

<    1   2   3   >