code 1
>
> Stop.
> make: stopped in /xports/graphics/gpu-firmware-kmod
>
> I've cleared out the distfiles and retried, but it keeps failing in
> the same place. Either the distfile is bad or the distinfo is
> incorrect.
I just committed a fix (r568772). Please try again.
Jun
On 20. 9. 29., Alex V. Petrov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 10:07:13AM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>> On 20. 9. 29., Alex V. Petrov wrote:
>>> 1 warning generated.
>>> CC libvnccommon_la-vncBlockHandler.lo
>>> CC libvnccommon_la-XorgGl
er
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop.
> make: stopped in /usr/ports/net/tigervnc-server
>
> ===>>> make build failed for net/tigervnc-server
> ===>>> Aborting update
Just remove net/tigervnc-server/files/patch-unix_xserver_hw_vnc_xvnc.c
and try again. I
or earlier today,
> --
> Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
> E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com
> PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B05568
I just committed a fix. Please try again.
Jung-uk Kim
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 20. 6. 29., Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On 20. 6. 27., Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On 27 Jun 2020, at 17:56, Mike Clarke
>> wrote:
>>> As someone with very little experience with C++ I'd welcome
>>> advice on how to fix this for 13.0- CURRENT. It builds wi
ex 2.6 now. If you are maintaining such
applications, you should update the ports, add devel/flex to
BUILD_DEPENDS, and set FLEX=${LOCALBASE}/bin/flex for releng/stable
branches.
In fact, I've waited long enough (3.5 years) to not break existing
ports. I thought we should be fine by now but I guess
note: expanded from macro 'AREG0'
> #define AREG0 "r14"
> ^
>
> Any ideas?
It looks like you built devel/kBuild without GCC option.
Jung-uk Kim
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ports/head/emulators/virtualbox-ose
> Relative URL: ^/head/emulators/virtualbox-ose
> Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports
> Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5
> Revision: 484572
> Node Kind: directory
> Schedule: normal
> Last Changed Author: jkim
>
forwards?)
>
> the whole project compile takes me over a day so moving up is not to be
> taken lightly if it won't fix it.
Please see PR225054.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225054
It was fixed by r328090.
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/328090
Jung-uk Kim
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
need to be updated to chase the libxcb
> update?
Please see PR214340:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214340
Jung-uk Kim
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
client-2.5.6)
> (linker error)
> ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed
> ---> Session ended at: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 21:43:48 +0300 (consumed
> 00:07:06)
It's trying to link with older binaries. Try removing it first, i.e.,
"pkg delete -f databases/firebird25-client", and rebuild.
Jung-uk Kim
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rprint” works without error.
>
> I’m stumped — any ideas?
It is PR212921.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212921
It's already fixed in r306335:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/306335
Please update your sources, rebuild, and try again.
Jung-uk Kim
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__uintptr_t;
> ...
>
> This is on an amd64 head system.
#ifdef __LP64__
...
typedef __uint64_t __uintptr_t;
#else
...
typedef __uint32_t __uintptr_t;
#endif
Jung-uk Kim
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> instruction: `shlx %edx,%edi,%edx' {standard input}:6517: Error: no
> such instruction: `shlx %edx,%edi,%edx' {standard input}:6560:
> Error: no such instruction: `shlx %edx,%edi,%edx' {standard
> input}:6585: Error: no such instruction: `shlx %edx,%edi,%edx'
...
FYI, I
;>
> Yes
...
The fix was committed. Thanks!
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWFVf8AAoJEHyflib82/FGP2cH/3LfhhclicM5dbNPnnOoH8MO
KUet1CoiqL7c5vmD0eoyat38k5Kx95G81auzgwg7mRElfjzt5lH5C8C1qOiGITru
qJAfdDX2VVjQwGT3nUs2aNgdbjoIRQQw5/2lv9Fz1ZIFn4Mhg05Yv4ICAFJ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/04/2015 11:03, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote:
El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 20:22 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribió:
On 08/03/2015 19:23, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote:
El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 18:26 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribió:
On 08/03/2015 17
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/04/2015 18:22, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote:
El mar, 04-08-2015 a las 17:40 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribió:
On 08/04/2015 11:03, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote:
El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 20:22 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribió:
On 08/03/2015 19
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/03/2015 19:23, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote:
El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 18:26 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribió:
On 08/03/2015 17:40, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote:
El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 17:26 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribió:
On 08/03/2015 16
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/03/2015 17:40, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote:
El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 17:26 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribió:
On 08/03/2015 16:41, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote:
El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 16:33 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribió:
Hi Jung-uk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/03/2015 16:41, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote:
El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 16:33 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribió:
Hi Jung-uk,
On 08/03/2015 16:26, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote:
Hi people,
Recently I added amd64 support to TinyCC, but I
this problem in the tinycc-devel mailing list [1]
Any thoughts?
I haven't tried tcc but '' is missing for the printf().
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVv9AuAAoJEHyflib82/FGcssH/RJOU1MJFGfiV4EzWeSm9rNy
XzqwOQUH3SjcMVf/13JeBOPTYvrpvGra
)); +AddrR3 =
round_page((vm_offset_t)pProc-p_vmspace-vm_daddr +
lim_max_proc(pProc, RLIMIT_DATA)); PROC_UNLOCK(pProc); } else
Cool! It works. Thank you very much.
Committed.
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/389147
Thanks!
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
, massively faulty package
repositories are produces.
[Adding the maintainer to CC]
I know bsd.openssl.mk has been broken for very long time. For example,
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50108FEF.3030405
However, I am not sure whether entirely removing it is the best way
going forward.
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/01/2015 17:21, Yuri wrote:
On 04/01/2015 14:17, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
I know bsd.openssl.mk has been broken for very long time. For
example,
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50108FEF.3030405
However, I am not sure whether entirely
on the list is java/openjdk6, for which ports r374780 [4]
was very recently committed.
Unfortunately, r374780 was not enough. Instead, I just turned off
-Werror for now (r374824).
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/374824
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
delete print/tex-luatex print/tex-xetex
portmaster --no-confirm --no-term-title -D -G \
print/tex-luatex print/tex-xetex
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUdMtDAAoJEHyflib82/FGTq0H/iJXyFgtJGy+cBNWD/PXq01D
9xaOPa3L+BjOvvmsbFkVSAcr7AguQOZm8ukVSEX1q6K
the
problem.
Working fine with Radeon HD 4650 (RV730).
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUTsNVAAoJEHyflib82/FG7yEH/2gGETWn7ho4q9c2TIOF9ELW
dA9JlCmG09ZZRY4R3sr3LpwmxFFm3h/nRclbWnn5QuPTTI/1d3tNRHLcV0bw8ax4
Ck7
seem to use it now.
FYI,
Jung-uk Kim
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
; for x in
{1..200}; do echo done; done) |bash 2/dev/null ||echo -n V)
[ ${CVE7187} == V ] echo VULNERABLE || echo NOT VULNERABLE”
Good luck ;-)
Yes, it passes all tests (the patch attached).
Jung-uk Kim
--- parse.y.orig2014-09-30 12:58:08.462512373 -0400
+++ parse.y 2014-09-30 12
if that gives false positives ?
...
Yes, it seems it does.
https://github.com/hannob/bashcheck/commit/5b611b36
Jung-uk Kim
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail
.
CVE-2014-7169 is fixed now (r369261).
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/369261
Note the commit log says CVE-2014-3659 but it was actually reassigned
as CVE-2014-7169.
Jung-uk Kim
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:58:30AM +0530, Riyaz T.K wrote:
Hi,
https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi
.
Committed (r356537), thanks!
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTj3HhAAoJEHyflib82/FGUmQIAIkVpCXF1fLMoSszsnZUssfh
I+s1OaVhg1lJ34QYa4Q0/fnUZ+akv/CmjMVGtjNItiZe84T0Vwr9xknpNGZfKDfI
cnZhkYzoeEr2mOuQ7JqXf/BZgpdf3F/KmxwWJdjceJGF5nBsalZ3I6QMWnb0oqj
if $COMPILER_TYPE was properly
detected. Maybe something's wrong with your base. Revert your local
changes and try the following from the port:
make -V COMPILER_TYPE
It should print 'clang'.
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTjLnvAAoJEHyflib82
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2014-06-02 13:52:48 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On 2014-06-01 11:57:50 -0400, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
kBuild: Compiling VBoxOGLhosterrorspu -
/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-4.3.12/src/VBox/GuestHost/OpenGL/error
/poudriere.d should do.
JAVA_PREFERRED_PORTS=JAVA_PORT_NATIVE_OPENJDK_JDK_1_7
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTh2Y+AAoJEHyflib82/FGhxwH/23MNaJ7RjsvTHV6cMS3IcGV
uKt7WjRvZGHaQ/DBw5U0UxXqh3rsiwAlQh8XzHQVasaALSokCdQFJI80/cDvD5f/
uGz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2014-05-29 15:38:57 -0400, Vick Khera wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org
wrote:
JAVA_PREFERRED_PORTS=JAVA_PORT_NATIVE_OPENJDK_JDK_1_7
nice. that works! this variable seems undocumented within
have it.
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTVZT9AAoJEHyflib82/FGZYEH/3NtXkh9zLZzxvPGLhOa1ahY
al3Hji+taA8w70AZMEwlZjmc0nJ/P7imid9kYJUyMHh0MY6QY20hw36WawhJ2zdN
vkmTpXb4IQe7MTok0uXoTXtpoPcKelk64yer4j1bjTbr6VO7vjeNgKlR/8R5wJL+
7CHbrJOg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2014-04-21 18:00:30 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
2014년 4월 21일 18:00, Jung-uk Kim 쓴 글: On 2014-04-21 17:46:32
- -0400, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 2014-04-21 16:40, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 05:23:04PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote
/forum/#!msg/mailing.freebsd.emulator/YbtmccinYW0/P
2EMSwEB_jEJ may be helpful.
Please read the PR itself.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=188053
I'm going to commit the patches today but it is actually an upstream
problem.
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
/virtualbox-ose-additions/files/extrapatch-src-VBox-Additions-x11-VBoxClient-Makefile.kmk
https://redports.org/browser/jkim/emulators/virtualbox-ose-additions/files/extrapatch-src-VBox-Additions-x11-vboxvideo-Makefile.kmk
The port maintainers did not like them, though. :-(
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-11-15 05:44:39 -0500, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:19:35 -0500 Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On 2013-11-14 14:53:29 -0500, Greg Rivers wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
run `nspluginwrapper -a -v -i` now.
On Thu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-11-15 13:53:09 -0500, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:36:50 -0500 Jung-uk Kim wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 2013-11-15 05:44:39 -0500, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:19:35 -0500 Jung
update www/nspluginwrapper soon. Sorry for the breakage.
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJShSXuAAoJEHyflib82/FGIIwH/iUHlEK4naA/ey2HgM90qg53
PW4j1hyxaPtaEmpSWp0jHBPFMojJ9DvHBlhrRpgqgTrQDeAU7+c8N6q1YmfKlkxb
iwXoHuiZB0xWFG79UzQB93mZCBE58VKj8
-v -a -i
Thanks for the suggestions guys, but for me, `nspluginwrapper -a -v
-i` does not find the .so either. Sorry, I should have mentioned
that in the first place.
I imagine Jung-uk Kim will fix nspluginwrapper presently.
Automatic installation is now updated.
http
time? Is there any use case?
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSWDrGAAoJEHyflib82/FGF9MH/2uUeQEOtQ2IH30dgC0EAlTn
nYeu61jluTehKhJMzF6SLVXnmoMlSsYPLFQywo8GKWe/nDZ5DQ+b2G1+ZSetqylK
YatYPRGPhGTfpRIDbaA0DOEHv4kws9LDOAoqDALV+RSr5xOSFH3E0Zj8e+jFF3ne
-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSVy7XAAoJEHyflib82/FGhusH/3addLumUCI6qIzVlvtPv+MN
8a/bB1RBM/GBWyQMXpuG6uQlwW5qvDv7FEA8JPGqNaxJJUKqWWiRmesLOtRwIiky
sYkAhKxwQUzoWW8JY3a1E1RcjV2yjZB+l7N/tlh1hTuwFEazYhctqI/qYtf5eqis
ybBgF+ACBydMs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-10-10 18:44:05 -0400, Greg Rivers wrote:
Error 1
It should be fixed by r330035.
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/330035
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSVy7XAAoJEHyflib82
this behavior and get the right thing by
setting JAVAVM_FALLBACK_ONLY=1
It is normally unnecessary.
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSQzQ/AAoJEHyflib82/FGEacH/iQh2YXQ5w/6OP+crwRK8xr7
jxckXVBog4CVfnF
/etc/javavms,
No, it is NOT the place for preference as I said earlier. In fact, it
has (almost) no user serviceable part in it.
then you want to set JAVAVM_FALLBACK_ONLY instead of JAVA_HOME
No, it seems JAVA_VERSION is what you want.
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
Drop this file in files directory and try it again.
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR6YVZAAoJECXpabHZMqHOYL8IANOg9rbh9Y1tWwS9S5SBG3g9
UVWzyvEWi3Td+53L+qcwkkB7a5Fz+c9H3QvWb8f4thaVSGICL3yte1eZ45aiPe2E
rcq
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-07-19 14:41:15 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On 2013-07-19 14:28:48 -0400, Evan Martin wrote:
I asked the Chrome clang masters on your behalf and got this
answer:
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/topic/clang/YEdQW6NTghY/discussion
the same problem with
LibreOffice some time ago and I fixed it. The short answer is the
NULL is not an integral type in C++11 mode since r228918.
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/228918
Please see my patch to fix the problem:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/patch-clang
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-07-19 15:39:09 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
On 07/19/13 14:28, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
I had the same problem last night and made a patch.
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/patch-clang
Drop this file in files directory and try it again.
Jung
with r252382. Basically, C compilers
don't complain about this implicit casting but C++ compilers do not
like it at all. Luckily, it is easy to fix. Please see the attached
patch.
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR1GYuAAoJECXpabHZMqHOOZMH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-07-03 19:37:45 -0400, Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 07/03/13 19:58, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On 2013-07-03 13:38:46 -0400, AN wrote:
FreeBSD FBSD10 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #73 r252430:
Sun Jun 30 17:30:59 CDT 2013
root@FBSD10:/usr/obj/usr
version. OTOH, this version is far more popular and third-party
sources often require this version. Most importantly, NetBSD,
DragonFly BSD, and Mac OS X already adopted it for the same reason.
Cheers!
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-05-21 16:30:48 -0400, John Marino wrote:
On 5/21/2013 22:03, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
Please note flex/lex was updated to 2.5.37 from
flex.sourceforge.net and __FreeBSD_version was bumped to
133.
FYI, I added couple of compatibility shims
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-05-21 18:11:23 -0400, John Marino wrote:
On 5/21/2013 23:05, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
Can you please explain the most common incompatibilities you
experienced from dports?
FYI, I have added these two shims for FreeBSD:
http
The FreeBSD Security Officer clearly stated that we do not intend to
release a security advisory for this issue and I perfectly agree with
him.
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJReFn8AAoJECXpabHZMqHO+pUH/0VWykQGCBEUu5zzMJLQVPKb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-04-24 18:17:32 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On 2013-04-24 17:43:29 -0400, M Rusli wrote:
Hi
It seems like Freebsd 9.1 are prone to constant crashes.
The mouse pointer disappear and my computer freezes up.
I have to press the power
frequently run a portsnap fetch, (extract only once) and an
update.
...
This problem was already discussed multiple times. [1][2]
You can download my patch from here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/libxml2.diff
Jung-uk Kim
1.
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACGq7x3mR6obs=Y0Q_fk3aTw0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-04-18 18:06:24 -0400, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org
wrote: On 2013-04-17 21:18:21 -0400, Jim Pazarena wrote:
On 9.1 amd, something has changed within my ports. This
compiled fine
, or it
contains some bug triggered only by the vectorizer. I am still
investigating.
...
With -fno-vectorize, this problem doesn't seem to happen.
FYI,
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRbvUHAAoJECXpabHZMqHOekEIAIml2te9436LzTFsr794y82E
Vmytl95H
/libreoffice/files/patch-testtools__Module_testtools.mk
Drop the file in libreoffice/files directory and rebuild.
Actually, I am going to commit it soonish because I've seen enough
complaints already. :-(
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-02-06 13:19:12 -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On 2013-02-06 11:15:44 -0500, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2013/2/6 Denny Lin dennyli...@hs.ntnu.edu.tw:
gmake[2]: ***
[/tmp/lobuild/workdir/unxfbsd.pro/CustomTarget/testtools/uno_test.done
with GCJ. In fact, there
was no ECJ 4.5 release, AFAIK.
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ9fSuAAoJECXpabHZMqHOI+wH/0/b1Kc6Og4ShbKViUckL9pK
tP1+GleHPvzAcN8F6QlH9bVQ6UFJZ+KqJCFISCQrvoxn2f2Xhg1oJy6FBtFXfZEy
RJyY
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-01-15 19:30:38 -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On 2013-01-15 04:18:54 -0500, Alex Dupre wrote:
Gerald Pfeifer ha scritto:
to address ports/175072 I finally went ahead with an old plan
of mine and broke the binary ecj.jar that is used to build
/bootstrap-openjdk
However, I believe a) is the ultimate solution, e.g., ECJ/GCJ + GNU
classpath + CacaoVM/JamVM/Avian, etc. (VMKit/LLVM is in my wildest
dreams...)
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-26 08:18:26 -0400, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 26/07/2012 03:31 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
I guess you had installed OpenSSL from ports. ;-)
Yes, bingo.
Now I am able to build it with GCC 4.6:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-25 03:12:21 -0400, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 25/07/2012 00:29 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
On 2012-07-23 16:55:50 -0400, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 23/07/2012 23:49 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
On 2012-07-23 16:34:34 -0400, Andriy Gapon
.
Please note WITH_GCC knob is back. If base GCC doesn't work for
you, please try it as well, i.e., make WITH_GCC=yes.
Please make sure to include uname -a output when you report
success/failure.
Thanks!
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG
in
default mode[1] (but I believe you may experience run-time problems).
llvm/clang/binutils combo from ports may be able to build it[2] but I
don't think we can guarantee its correctness.
So, I am stuck here. What do we do now? :-(
Jung-uk Kim
[1] devel/boost-libs had to be removed first
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-23 14:02:18 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
Over the weekend, I have tried various environments to build
LibreOffice. Basically, it is really tricky to do the right thing
in 7 and 8 branches.
devel/boost-libs in ports tree (1.48) is newer
whatsoever.
I am a little bit saddened that GCC46 option was thrown out.
We can re-add it but it makes the Makefile little too complicated. :-(
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-23 16:55:50 -0400, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 23/07/2012 23:49 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
On 2012-07-23 16:34:34 -0400, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Just a note: yesterday I built the port using GCC 4.6 and
external cppunit also built with GCC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-19 15:36:54 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On 2012-07-19 15:09:08 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote:
Btw, does anybody know *why* the LibreOffice port attempts to
compile everything as C++0x or C++11? Is it really using those
features
On 2012-07-19 09:21:30 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-07-19 01:34, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
While I was tackling LibreOffice build issues, I found something
interesting about __cplusplus. Basically, different C++
compilers may have different __cplusplus definitions and it may
cause some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-19 15:09:08 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-07-19 20:07, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On 2012-07-19 09:21:30 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote:
...
Since when Clang started mimicking GCC 4.7?
Most likely since somebody attempted to get
for LibreOffice on 7 8. Sorry for that. Working on fixing it.
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAlAIZG0ACgkQmlay1b9qnVOzSQCcDvPkR6W5ODT0zKdSr+QwJd20
IVgAoM5vSR//zN3LIWC0+RsHdkdGF1QI
working on a fix. Please
stay tuned.
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAlAG94AACgkQmlay1b9qnVP3eACfQQ0pIcZhKobMdQH5G1dPa8Qn
NAwAoIpg+paSaqK8oAtUzxSn6MgrgNv2
=96xO
-END PGP SIGNATURE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-18 14:11:46 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org writes:
It is not clang's fault actually and I am working on a fix.
Please stay tuned.
One issue is that different problems have been presenting with
very
/* __GNUG__ */
Before that, we had this:
#if defined(__GNUG__) defined(__GNUC__) __GNUC__ = 4
#define NULL__null
#else
#if defined(__LP64__)
#define NULL(0L)
#else
#define NULL0
#endif /* __LP64__ */
#endif /* __GNUG__ */
What a mess...
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-18 18:21:53 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On 2012-07-18 14:11:46 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org writes:
It is not clang's fault actually and I am working on a fix.
Please stay tuned.
One issue
${LOCALBASE}/lib/libreoffice/program/addin/.keep /tmp
At least, it worked for me. :-)
I'll do a proper fix if it works for everyone.
Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-13 18:07:32 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-07-13 22:15, Jung-uk Kim wrote: ...
It is mmap'ing an empty file and that's the root cause. Try
move ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libreoffice/program/addin/.keep away and
try again, e.g.,
mv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-13 18:36:37 -0400, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On 2012-07-13 22:15, Jung-uk Kim wrote: ...
It is mmap'ing an empty file and that's the root cause. Try
move ${LOCALBASE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-13 18:46:09 -0400, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-13 18:07:32 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-07-13 22:15, Jung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-13 19:26:21 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On 2012-07-13 18:46:09 -0400, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 2012-07-13 18:07:32 -0400
On Thursday 16 February 2012 04:26 pm, Andrey Chernov wrote:
It seems part of the bug is already noticed by maintainer (Jung-uk
Kim) but nothing is done to fix it:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2011-September/06
4067.html BTW, the bug is in native FreeBSD code (rpc.c
*before* 9.0-RELEASE.
Please try make configure and send me config-host.h from
work/nspluginwrapper-1.4.4 directory.
Jung-uk Kim
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any
On Friday 17 February 2012 01:32 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
This invalid in sockaddr looks familiar as for some time ago
added sockaddr length checks our kernel, but as bz@ says this
should be already fixed.
Yes, it should be fixed *before* 9.0-RELEASE.
I meant 9.0 was released with the fix
On Thursday 14 July 2011 12:57 pm, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
On 2011/07/14 00:57, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
links.diff, metalink-editor.diff, tome.diff:
- Add static desktop files to work around DESKTOP_ENTRIES
limitations.
This is a step backwards and I'll oppose
elaborate .desktop file than this
variable permits, write it yourself and install it
in ${DESKTOPDIR}.
The actual bug for bsd.port.mk was that it did not mention field 4
Exec cannot contain '/' or any options, IMHO.
Jung-uk Kim
___
freebsd-ports
On Thursday 14 July 2011 01:55 pm, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 07/14/2011 12:47 PM, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
Anyhow, I guess we can do it much simpler:
--- Mk/bsd.port.mk 3 Jul 2011 15:51:18 - 1.687
+++ Mk/bsd.port.mk 14 Jul 2011 17:26:43 -
@@ -6432,7 +6432,7
On Thursday 14 July 2011 03:15 pm, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Jung-uk Kim p紫e v �t 14. 07. 2011 v 15:07 -0400:
entry. I assume that the filename of the desktop entry is
unimportant,
The filename of desktop entry should be 100% inconsequential,
and our only care should be not have two
On Wednesday 13 July 2011 07:39 am, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
On 2011/07/13 00:25, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
After I updated x11-wm/compiz, GNOME was not able to start the
window manager. Basically, it complained that compiz-manager was
not found. Then, I realized compiz-manager.desktop
On Wednesday 13 July 2011 12:08 am, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 07/12/2011 05:25 PM, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
After I updated x11-wm/compiz, GNOME was not able to start the
window manager. Basically, it complained that compiz-manager was
not found. Then, I realized compiz-manager.desktop
On Wednesday 13 July 2011 12:42 pm, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 07/13/2011 10:41 AM, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Wednesday 13 July 2011 07:39 am, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
On 2011/07/13 00:25, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
After I updated x11-wm/compiz, GNOME was not able to start the
window manager
On Wednesday 13 July 2011 01:04 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Wednesday 13 July 2011 12:42 pm, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 07/13/2011 10:41 AM, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Wednesday 13 July 2011 07:39 am, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
On 2011/07/13 00:25, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
After I updated x11-wm
On Wednesday 13 July 2011 12:59 pm, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 07/13/2011 11:42 AM, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Wednesday 13 July 2011 12:08 am, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
wrote:
On 07/12/2011 05:25 PM, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
After I updated x11-wm/compiz, GNOME was not able to start
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
