Re: Does building linux packages under poudriere require linux compatibility emulation?

14.01.2017, 12:18, "René Ladan" : > Op 14 jan. 2017 01:07 schreef "Mark Martinec" > : > > When building packages under poudriere on 11.0-RELEASE-p7 (from a command > line in a terminal window) I'm noticing occasional streams of diagnostic: > >  

Re: Optimising generated rules for SAT solving (5/12 are duplicates)

23.11.2016, 19:42, "Hans Petter Selasky" : > On 11/23/16 17:27, Ed Schouten wrote: >>  Hi Hans, >> >>  2016-11-23 15:27 GMT+01:00 Hans Petter Selasky : >>>  I've made a patch to hopefully optimise SAT solving in our pkg utility. >> >>  Nice! Do you by any

Re: Patch for premake 4.4 beta 5 from premake 4

CC'ing premake developers. 24.06.2014, 18:09, Vitaly Magerya vmage...@gmail.com:  TL;DR: could a brave ports comitter apply an update for  devel/premake4 at [1]? That would be much appreciated.  Redports logs for this update are at [2].  Note that redports for some reason doesn't invoke

Re: any javascript browser works on sparc64?

19.06.2014, 12:26, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk: I had to switch to sparc64 for my X clients. www/firefox is blocked by multimedia/libvpx. Can anybody recommend a working web browser with javascript? It should be possible to build Firefox without libvpx which is needed only to

Re: [CFT/HEADSUP] Ports now have Stack Protector support

21.09.2013, 18:26, Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org: On 09/21/13 09:09, Bryan Drewery wrote:  On 9/21/2013 9:00 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:  On 09/21/13 05:47, Bryan Drewery wrote:  Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10  i386 and amd64, and older

Re: [CFT/HEADSUP] Ports now have Stack Protector support

22.09.2013, 19:48, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com: On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Konstantin Tokarev annu...@yandex.ru wrote:  21.09.2013, 18:26, Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org:  On 09/21/13 09:09, Bryan Drewery wrote:   On 9/21/2013 9:00 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:   On 09

Re: [HEADSUP][CFT] New compiler USES flag, please test, review comment

13.09.2013, 19:04, Pietro Cerutti g...@freebsd.org: On 2013-Sep-13, 15:17, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:  USES= compiler:c++11  Means you need a c++1 capable compiler but not necessary a c++ 11 aware standard  library, in that case if the base compiler is not able to support c++11 clang33

Re: gdb doesn't work well with qtcreator

09.08.2012, 15:50, HU Dong itechb...@gmail.com: Hi,all! I just installed devel/qtcreator from port. Everything seemed to work fine except the debugger. At first I set it to /usr/bin/gdb, it simply crashed when I started debugging, with a dialog reporting The gdb process crashed. Then I

Re: port variants

13.04.2012, 23:55, Chris Inacio nacho...@gmail.com: On Apr 13, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:  On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Chris Inacio nacho...@gmail.com wrote:  I was recently asked to do some FreeBSD ports support work.  I mostly use a  Mac and the MacPorts

Re: KDE3 de facto EOL, Project Trinity?

09.10.2011, 22:30, Jakub Lach: Speaking of lightness, XFCE is memory hungry these days and Linux centric, and Fluxbox is not that light after all. Are you saying that Fluxbox is heavier than KDE3?? -- Regards, Konstantin ___

Re: devel/anjuta: creating project does not offer project's dialog.

01.07.2011, 11:06, O. Hartmann And, for those actively developing, is there a good alternative to Anjuta (no KDevelop, since I do not like KDE and do not have KDE). Thanks, Oliver Depending on what you need you can try: Geany Vim Eclipse Qt Creator Actually, KDevelop does not require you

Re: devel/anjuta: creating project does not offer project's dialog.

01.07.2011, 11:49, O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de: On 07/01/11 09:35, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:  01.07.2011, 11:06, O. Hartmann  And, for those actively developing, is there a good alternative to  Anjuta (no KDevelop, since I do not like KDE and do not have KDE). Thanks,  Oliver

Re: Best way to uninstall X

07.04.2011, 23:15, David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com: On 07/04/2011 19:29, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:  07.04.2011, 20:59, Attosattos.ja...@gmail.com;:  Hello all,  What is the best way to uninstall X and all the applications that run under  X?  Thanks in advance.  rm -rf

Re: Compiling ports in a post-9.0-RELEASE world

16.03.2011, 11:33, Alberto Villa avi...@freebsd.org: On Wednesday 16 March 2011 09:15:07 Konstantin Tokarev wrote:  From http://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html  In addition to the language extensions listed here, Clang aims to support  a broad range of GCC extensions.  So

Re: Compiling ports in a post-9.0-RELEASE world

17.03.2011, 15:39, Konstantin Tokarev annu...@yandex.ru: 16.03.2011, 11:33, Alberto Villa avi...@freebsd.org;:  On Wednesday 16 March 2011 09:15:07 Konstantin Tokarev wrote:   From http://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html   In addition to the language extensions listed here

Re: Compiling ports in a post-9.0-RELEASE world

16.03.2011, 02:27, Alberto Villa avi...@freebsd.org: On Tuesday 15 March 2011 19:20:40 Konstantin Tokarev wrote:  3. Fix Clang to compile more ports lots of problems are due to gcc-isms in software, so it's not always possible From http://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html

Re: Compiling ports in a post-9.0-RELEASE world

16.03.2011, 13:33, Ade Lovett a...@freebsd.org: On Mar 16, 2011, at 04:39 , Anton Shterenlikht wrote:  What will happen to ports in non-clang arches (sparc64, ia64) after 9.0R? With any luck, they will die a silent death and be pointed in the direction of NetBSD that likes to look after

Re: Is it possible to install only some parts of libreoffice?

07.03.2011, 00:54, Heino Tiedemann rotkaps_spam_t...@gmx.de: Konstantin Tokarev annu...@yandex.ru; wrote:  03.03.2011, 03:27, Charlie Kester corky1...@comcast.net;:  On Wed 02 Mar 2011 at 15:06:52 PST Charlie Kester wrote:  I don't want or need all of the programs in the libreoffice suite

Re: Compiling ports in a post-9.0-RELEASE world

13.03.2011, 01:00, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org: Howdy, As many of you are no doubt already aware, much work has been undertaken to make clang the default compiler for the src tree starting with 9.0-RELEASE. It is not 100% certain that this change will be made, but it's looking more

Re: Compiling ports in a post-9.0-RELEASE world

15.03.2011, 21:32, Charlie Kester corky1...@comcast.net: On Tue 15 Mar 2011 at 11:20:40 PDT Konstantin Tokarev wrote: 3. Fix Clang to compile more ports That would be my vote too, but we should probably focus on solutions the ports team can control. You can post bug reports to Clang team

Re: (no subject)

04.03.2011, 10:44, Anoop K kmtan...@gmail.com: Hello, I am a MS windows user and have come here from PC-BSD. I would like to make a port request for Radiance http://radsite.lbl.gov/radiance/ . N.B: I have only begun experimenting with FreeBSD and have 8.2 installed on a stand alone multi

Re: Is it possible to install only some parts of libreoffice?

03.03.2011, 03:27, Charlie Kester corky1...@comcast.net: On Wed 02 Mar 2011 at 15:06:52 PST Charlie Kester wrote: I don't want or need all of the programs in the libreoffice suite. In fact, the only reason I might install it is to get the presentation program so I can work with PowerPoint

Re: security/qca-tls 1.0_7 does not build in 9-CURRENT

02.03.2011, 08:56, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de: Hello, Compiling the above mentioned port fails with: # make ===  Building for qca-tls-1.0_7 c++ -c -pipe -Wall -W -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC  -DQCA_PLUGIN -DOSSL_097 -DOSSL_098 -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -DQT_PLUGIN

Re: How to not use OPTIMIZED_FLAGS properly

07.02.2011, 20:34, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru: Hello. I'm working on port that doesn't builds with -O2 -pipe, that passed to Makefile by default (it exits with message about virtual memory is exhausted). I can avoid this by setting CFLAGS= and CXXFLAGS= in CONFIGURE_ENV. But

Re: policy on having the same routines in different library archives?

02.02.2011, 13:28, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk: I've put a port of Slatec together: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/151970 Recently I realised that some 110 routines in Slatec are already present in math/blas, and the Blas versions seem to be newer. % ar -t

Re: policy on having the same routines in different library archives?

I realise that fortran numerical libraries will not interest many, so perhaps this is irrelevant anyway.. I guess ones who are interested will prefer to have a choice of BLAS implementation depending on target hardware, parallelization scales, peculiarities of problem, personal preference,

Re: [www/chromium] Illegal instruction: 4 on Pentium3

Chromium requires sse2 normally, as detailed in this bug report: http://crbug.com/9007 This bug report is related to Chromium 2, but I've run Chromium 4 on PIII on Linux without problems -- Regards, Konstantin ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

Re: GIMP 2.4 - better ui usability

23.10.2010, 18:38, Tomek CEDRO tomek.ce...@gmail.com: On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Konstantin Tokarev annu...@yandex.ru wrote:  Maybe someone has similar feeling, so I thought maybe  its not that bad idea to create GIMP 2.4 port that keep all of the  nice features destroyed by a new

Re: GIMP 2.4 - better ui usability

Maybe someone has similar feeling, so I thought maybe its not that bad idea to create GIMP 2.4 port that keep all of the nice features destroyed by a new design team in GIMP 2.6? Haven't you tried to take in contact with GIMP developers? -- Regards, Konstantin

Re: Distributed Version Control for ports(7) ( was: Re: autoconf update )

This dvcs is BSD licensed: IMHO, if it's worth to change VCS, it would be much wiser to use well-known one -- Regards, Konstantin ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send

Re: Distributed Version Control for ports(7) ( was: Re: autoconf update )

22.09.2010, 14:11, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com: BSD license has a particular advantage in embedded/black box systems, so not polluting base with more viral licensing is pretty important to project as whole I think. Do embedded systems really need to use ports tree? I guess no, or

Re: Distributed Version Control for ports(7) ( was: Re: autoconf update )

1). http://bit.ly/d5UrtN 2). http://www.keltia.net/BSDCan/paper.pdf 3). http://bit.ly/97Y8Xi 4). Because CVS just does not do any of this. Make your final comparison here: http://bit.ly/cyQBn8 For the sake of argument can you think of any reason to not switch ? Why not Git? Or you

Re: Re: GPLv3-licensed ports

No, 3-clause BSD license is compatible with GPLv3 [1] (you can follow multiple arrows on that figure). You can combine BSD-licensed code with GPLv3-licensed code and either use it privately or redistribute it under GPLv3. Pretty much the same as with GPLv2. Surely. This actually

Fwd: FreeBSD Port: qtcreator-1.2.1: Not installable

Пересылаемое сообщение 28.10.09, 17:19, Konstantin Tokarev annu...@yandex.ru: 28.10.09, 16:42, Konstantin Tokarev : Do you really need Qt Creator IDE as dependency? I guess you need install qt4-qui-4.5.2 package, it will download qt4-core, qt4-qmake, qt4-uic, qt4-moc

Re: [Fwd: Re: acroread9 crashes after maybe 10 seconds ofoperation.]

Throw this proprietary and veeery slow shit^Wsoftware out of ports tree! 19.10.09, 17:31, Stephen Montgomery-Smith step...@missouri.edu: Boris Samorodov wrote: 1wk...@gmail.com writes: Unfortunately, the map_at_zero sysctl didn't work for me. The following massage still recorded in