Hi,
could someone take it, please? It is a security update.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199162
I am uncertain about the vuxml entry correctness.
Thanks!
--
Regards,
Marco
pgpt_a8CipEHC.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Fri, 01 Aug 2014 08:41:04 -0400
Daniel Morante dan...@morante.net wrote:
I am trying to create a port for an application that supports both
Qt4 and Qt5.
Qt4 builds fine and I am using the following in the port's Makefile:
QT4_CONFIGURE_WITH=gui=qt4
QT4_USE=
Hi,
could a ports committer please look at PR ports/187370 (second patch),
please?
I know there is a huge PR count. But this is somewhat urgent now
because of a security vulnerability just fixed in a second new release.
I am uncertain about a MFH and an vuxml entry.
Thank you!
--
Kind
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 18:18:38 +0100
Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 23.03.2014 17:03, schrieb Marco Bröder:
Hi,
could a ports committer please look at PR ports/187370 (second patch),
please?
I know there is a huge PR count. But this is somewhat urgent now
because
On 28.03.2013 19:05, Tod Olson wrote:
Having upgraded to mercurial 2.5.2, we see problems with hg-git 0.3.4, and
they seem to be fixed with hg-git 0.4.0. Will you be updating the FreeBSD
port of hg-git in the near future?
Yes. :-)
Sorry for the late reply. I just returned today.
You can
On 29.03.2013 05:20, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
The patch attached updates hg-git to 0.4.0 and tweaks a couple of port
things:
Thank you for your contribution! I just created a slightly different patch.
Please see my other email reply.
- Require py-ordereddict for users running Python 2.7
It is a
Hi,
could a ports committer take ports/173531 pr, please? It is unassigned for
over a month, now.
Thank you very much!
--
Kind regards
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 16.12.2012 12:25, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
Jason E. Hale wrote on 16.12.2012 15:13:
On Sunday, December 16, 2012 15:07:48 Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote:
Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote on 16.12.2012 14:59:
Hi Marco,
Marco Bröder wrote on 16.12.2012 13:52:
Hi,
could a ports committer take
On Sat July 16 2011 18:21:12 Chris Rees wrote:
Bear in mind they should work fine if the port doesn't hardcode absolute
paths.
Yes, they actually do! Please do not remove them, because they are not as
buggy as it is claimed here. I often use the -p option for testing of my
tinderbox -exp
On Tue June 15 2010 23:22:35 Wesley Shields wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 02:46:27AM +0200, Marco Bröder wrote:
Hello,
I know the ports license framework is very new and not mature yet.
But it is not very useful in its current state, because several
popular licenses are missing
On Tue June 15 2010 04:03:08 Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
On 06/15/10 00:46, Marco Bröder wrote:
I find it especially important to have a expression for 'version X or any
later version' (for example 'LGPLv2+'), since the following dummy example
is
not adequate:
A very good idea
On Tue June 15 2010 09:10:49 Janne Snabb wrote:
As a previous poster pointed out, I also think that the different
BSD licences should be separated.
Yes, they really are different licenses.
Who else should it know better than the FreeBSD Project (and NetBSD, OpenBSD,
DragonflyBSD, ...)? ;-)
is not done yet then nobody had the
time to do it yet. It is that simple. There are many things which need some
love or even need to be done at all. But if nobody does something nothing
gets done at all.
If that sounds rude - sorry, but it is the truth!
--
Regards,
Marco Bröder marco.broe...@gmx.eu
in the future.
Many users want everything right now but nobody but very few actually do the
jobs. And THIS is extremely frustrating and annoying.
That is the message I intended to say. ;-)
--
Regards,
Marco Bröder marco.broe...@gmx.eu
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 5615 106E 031A F3D3 64CC 0F9E 4DCE 6524
14 matches
Mail list logo
