Commiter for www/drush update required

2016-10-19 Thread Matthias Fechner
Dear all, could a commiter please have a look on: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213612 Thanks a lot! Gruß Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bi

Re: www/drush looking for commiter

2016-10-07 Thread Matthias Fechner
Thanks! Am 7. Oktober 2016 20:35:33 MESZ, schrieb Kurt Jaeger : >Hi! > >> looking for a commiter for: >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213254 > >Done. > >-- >p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 4 years >to go ! -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem

www/drush looking for commiter

2016-10-07 Thread Matthias Fechner
Dear all, looking for a commiter for: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213254 Thanks a lot! Gruß Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better

Re: Drush update 8.1.5

2016-09-30 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 26.09.2016 um 12:47 schrieb Matthias Fechner: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213000 > could a commiter please be so kind and look into it? Thanks! Gruß Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better

Drush update 8.1.5

2016-09-26 Thread Matthias Fechner
Dear all, could please someone commit: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213000 Thanks! Gruß Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better i

Re: Error in a package?

2016-09-12 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 11.09.2016 um 22:55 schrieb Grzegorz Junka: > Why I can not upgrade this package, even forcefully? > > root@ultrabook:~ # pkg upgrade -f javavmwrapper > Updating ultrabook repository catalogue... > ultrabook repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > The following 1 package(s

Re: apache-solr PR: 201455 (I think 212104 blocks usage of apache-solr)

2016-09-12 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 11.09.2016 um 13:45 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > There were last-minute changes. > 1) The startup scripts expect > > /var/db/solr/log4j.properties > > and not > > /var/log/solr/log4j.properties > > so I moved it and adapted it where needed. > > 2) I made some syntax/path fixes to files/pkg-message.in

Re: apache-solr PR: 201455 (I think 212104 blocks usage of apache-solr)

2016-09-11 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 11.09.2016 um 10:57 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > Thanks for the hint. > > I'm testbuilding jdk8 right now to test this. hm, that is strange. I have in the port: USE_JAVA= yes JAVA_VERSION= 1.8+ JAVA_RUN= yes so it should pull java8 as run dependency already. Is it not installed on your system?

Re: apache-solr PR: 201455 (I think 212104 blocks usage of apache-solr)

2016-09-11 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 11.09.2016 um 10:42 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > It still fails, with the same error as before, recorded in > /var/log/solr/solr-8983-console.log: > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: > org/eclipse/jetty/start/Main : Unsupported major.minor version 52.0 > at

Re: apache-solr PR: 201455 (I think 212104 blocks usage of apache-solr)

2016-09-11 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 11.09.2016 um 09:41 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > I've tested the startup. > Directly after the make install, if one tries to start solr, > three -dist files need to be copied to allow solr to start: > > /var/db/solr/solr.xml-dist > /usr/local/etc/solr.in.sh-dist > /var/log/solr/log4j.properties-

Re: apache-solr PR: 201455 (I think 212104 blocks usage of apache-solr)

2016-09-09 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 02.09.2016 um 00:08 schrieb Matthias Fechner: > ok, here we go: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212313 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201455 any progress here? Thanks Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software enginee

Re: apache-solr PR: 201455 (I think 212104 blocks usage of apache-solr)

2016-09-01 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 01.09.2016 um 20:11 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > Yes, please attach that diff to the PR. ok, here we go: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212313 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201455 The index data will be stored in /var/db/solr Log file will go to /var/log/solr

Re: apache-solr PR: 201455 (I think 212104 blocks usage of apache-solr)

2016-09-01 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 01.09.2016 um 19:08 schrieb Matthias Fechner: > If it is fine, I would create a diff and would attach it to PR 201455. the poudiere build log is here: https://pkg.fechner.net/data/103amd64-default/2016-09-01_19h00m20s/logs/apache-solr-6.2.0.log Gruß Matthias -- "Programming to

Re: apache-solr PR: 201455 (I think 212104 blocks usage of apache-solr)

2016-09-01 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 01.09.2016 um 17:28 schrieb Matthias Fechner: > I started with the port and have it running. > The current version can be found here: > https://github.com/idefix6/freebsd-apache-solr/tree/6.2.0 > I have now an updated version ready. I can start, stop and status the running solr

Re: apache-solr PR: 201455 (I think 212104 blocks usage of apache-solr)

2016-09-01 Thread Matthias Fechner
Hi, Am 01.09.2016 um 15:29 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > Yes, please. It was me who messed up that port, sorry for that. > The startup and config is still messy, it does not look easy. > I started with the port and have it running. The current version can be found here: https://github.com/idefix6/freebs

Re: apache-solr PR: 201455 (I think 212104 blocks usage of apache-solr)

2016-09-01 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 31.08.2016 um 12:38 schrieb Matthias Fechner: > As the new version was broken, I installed the old 4.x version and > locked the package. > > I just downloaded manually the 6.2 version into /usr/local/src and > started it from there (it works perfectly fine after defining the &

apache-solr PR: 201455 (I think 212104 blocks usage of apache-solr)

2016-08-31 Thread Matthias Fechner
Dear all, I initiated a long time ago a bug: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201455 As the new version was broken, I installed the old 4.x version and locked the package. I just downloaded manually the 6.2 version into /usr/local/src and started it from there (it works perfect

Re: Run Dependencies to llvm (for e.g. graphics/libEGL)

2016-08-31 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 31.08.2016 um 12:06 schrieb Fernando Herrero Carrón: > It probably makes sense, yes: http://www.mesa3d.org/llvmpipe.html > > LLVM is being used in more and more projects to optimize dynamically > generated code, in this case software 3D rendering. > thanks, good to know. Gruß Matthias -- "

Run Dependencies to llvm (for e.g. graphics/libEGL)

2016-08-31 Thread Matthias Fechner
Dear all, I just saw that I have for some installed packages llvm as run dependency (e.g. graphics/libEGL) that it has a run dependency to llvm36: cd /usr/ports make search name=libEGL R-deps: damageproto-1.2.1 ... llvm37-3.7.1_3 ... Does this really makes sense or is this a bug in one of th

Re: problem with net-mgmt/icinga2 upgrading from 2.4.10 to 2.5.1 (r420729)

2016-08-24 Thread Matthias Fechner
Dear all, Am 24.08.2016 um 15:12 schrieb Lars Engels: > I do not have *ssl from ports installed, so Icinga 2 uses the SSL > version from base. That's why it works for me. I face the exact same problem. I think SSL is required if you want to talk to icinga installation on other hosts? I personally

Re: Updates available for www/drush?

2016-08-13 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 13.08.2016 um 17:46 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > Thanks. Now, who has time to debug this 8-} ? why debug? Why not just fetch the phar file and place it as drush in /usr/local/bin and give execute permission to it? Thats it. I do not see any drawback here, even updates will be much easier. Gruß Ma

Re: Updates available for www/drush?

2016-08-13 Thread Matthias Fechner
Thanks Kurt, Am 13.08.2016 um 12:30 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211807 > > has the update. Would someone do run-tests who understands how to use it > and report results in the PR ? added my comments in the PR. Gruß Matthias -- "Programming today i

Re: Updates available for www/drush?

2016-08-13 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 13.08.2016 um 11:55 schrieb Jochen Neumeister: >> Dear all, >> >> >> drush in ports (www/drush) is version 6.5. Stable version is 8.3.1, >> check here: >> >> https://github.com/drush-ops/drush >> >> >> Has anyone an update port available? > Did you ask the maintainer? [1] > good idea, added mai

Updates available for www/drush?

2016-08-13 Thread Matthias Fechner
Dear all, drush in ports (www/drush) is version 6.5. Stable version is 8.3.1, check here: https://github.com/drush-ops/drush Has anyone an update port available? Thanks Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof prog

Re: Remove options from poudriere option files for ports which were removed in the port

2016-07-05 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 04.07.2016 um 22:03 schrieb John Marino: > sorry, the correct invocation is "synth status-everything". There is > a man page (man 1 synth) as well. thanks for this tip. As I have to check my poudriere build environment (I do not build my packages locally) I tried the following: poudriere test

Re: Remove options from poudriere option files for ports which were removed in the port

2016-07-01 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 01.07.2016 um 12:39 schrieb Kimmo Paasiala: > This is not a feature/bug of poudriere but of the ports system itself. > There's no tracking of obsoleted or removed options and no clever > methods to clean them up. It's only when you remove the options with > 'make rmconfig' and rewrite them again

Re: www/nextcloud port added

2016-06-22 Thread Matthias Fechner
Hi, Am 22.06.2016 um 09:15 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: I can work on it, can you provide a changelog or a link to the changelog ? https://github.com/nextcloud/server/releases Gruß Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof pr

net/samba-libsmbclient depends on complete outdated samba36

2016-06-16 Thread Matthias Fechner
Dear all, I just testing the www/nextcloud port that was commited yesterday, thanks a lot for this! There I saw that samba36 will be installed (in addition to samba43). I think the problem is located in port net/samba-libsmbclient which refers to: SAMBA_PORT= samba36 SAMBA_SUBPORT=

Re: what for is the "gogs" UID/GID

2016-05-03 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 04.05.2016 um 04:18 schrieb Vick Khera: Nice, thanks. I will see if I can make it build. if you have something to test, please let me know. Currently the fetch process seems not to work and the initial author of the patch has no time to continue here. Some patches seems to have been refu

Re: www/nginx-devel build failure after libbrotli update

2016-04-17 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 17.04.2016 um 01:48 schrieb Sergey A. Osokin: I've just committed a fix for devel/libbrotli, please update the ports tree and recompile devel/libbrotli. Thanks for report! compiles perfectly fine, thanks a lot! Bye Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striv

Re: www/nginx-devel build failure after libbrotli update

2016-04-16 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 16.04.2016 um 14:26 schrieb Jim Ohlstein: ===> nginx-devel-1.9.14_1 depends on shared library: libpcre.so - found (/usr/local/lib/libpcre.so) ===> Returning to build of nginx-devel-1.9.14_1 ===> nginx-devel-1.9.14_1 depends on shared library: libbrotlidec.so - not found ===> Installing

Re: LetsEncrypt.sh

2016-03-23 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 23.03.2016 um 05:30 schrieb @lbutlr: My executable is named /usr/local/bin/letsencrypt.sh and does not have a certonly option. $ letsencrypt.sh -h Usage: /usr/local/bin/letsencrypt.sh [-h] [command [argument]] [parameter [argument]] [parameter [argument]] ... I have this version installed

Re: LetsEncrypt.sh

2016-03-19 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 19.03.2016 um 13:40 schrieb @lbutlr: Is anyone using this port successfully? It appears to be running here, but is generating some 0 length files: total 64 8 -rw--- 1 443 443 1854 Mar 4 23:38 cert-1457159890.csr 0 -rw--- 1 443 443 0 Mar 4 23:38 cert-1457159890.pem 8 -rw---

Re: Pulling from github as a vendorized dependency in poudriere

2016-02-20 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 20.02.2016 um 02:42 schrieb Derek (freebsd lists): My current plan is to shoehorn a custom fetch/extract/patch into the port Makefile, based on Brooks' valued information, but it doesn't feel great. I faced the same problem with creating a port for gogs. Yuri implemented a nice way to get th

Re: New user/group in /usr/ports/UIDs and /usr/ports/GIDs

2016-02-17 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 16.02.2016 um 20:23 schrieb Douglas Thrift: While your arguments for user isolation make sense, they really only make sense if you were to be using gitolite or gitosis at the same time as gogs which I imagine would not be that common. I am not opposed to you having a gogs user on your system,

Re: New user/group in /usr/ports/UIDs and /usr/ports/GIDs

2016-02-16 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 16.02.2016 um 12:04 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: Done. Thanks a lot! Gruß Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning."

Re: New user/group in /usr/ports/UIDs and /usr/ports/GIDs

2016-02-16 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 16.02.2016 um 00:09 schrieb Douglas Thrift: I mentioned this already on that ticket, but why use the user "gogs" instead of "git" which is already used by the gitosis and gitolite ports? That seems like a more standard thing to see in your git urls: git clone g...@example.com vs git clone g..

Re: New user/group in /usr/ports/UIDs and /usr/ports/GIDs

2016-02-15 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 15.02.2016 um 16:24 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: >> it is not blocking in a hard way. >> But if you have it installed you deinstall it and reinstall it again, >> you maybe get permission problems, because the UID/GID for the gogs user >> can change. > > That's a valid point. > > Is there a reason for

Re: New user/group in /usr/ports/UIDs and /usr/ports/GIDs

2016-02-15 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 15.02.2016 um 10:49 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > The blocker for gogs is not the additional users, the blockers are > the GH_TUPLE and the Uses/go.mk changes: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204772 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205282 it is not blocking in

Re: New user/group in /usr/ports/UIDs and /usr/ports/GIDs

2016-02-15 Thread Matthias Fechner
Dear all, Am 13.02.2016 um 11:40 schrieb Matthias Fechner: > Yuri us are currently working on a new port for gogs: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205283 > > For this a new user and group is required. > I already checked the file and I would like to add the

New user/group in /usr/ports/UIDs and /usr/ports/GIDs

2016-02-13 Thread Matthias Fechner
Dear all, Yuri us are currently working on a new port for gogs: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205283 For this a new user and group is required. I already checked the file and I would like to add the following files: gogs:*:209:209::0:0:gogs user:/var/db/gogs/home:/bin/sh and

Re: Creating new port for gogs, put poudriere fail to clone github repo while build is running

2015-12-14 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 12.12.2015 um 22:41 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2015-December/101338.html > > It's all the same, whether it's godep, maven or git: > No network after the fetch-phase. very interesting thread. There are some promising patches available, that should

Re: Creating new port for gogs, put poudriere fail to clone github repo while build is running

2015-12-12 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 12.12.2015 um 18:45 schrieb Jason Unovitch: > Build requisites must be retrieved during the fetch phase as there is > no network access during the build phase. Else a package could end up > changing or having security flaws slipped in based solely on when it > was built rather than what distinf

Creating new port for gogs, put poudriere fail to clone github repo while build is running

2015-12-12 Thread Matthias Fechner
Dear all, I started a long time ago a new port for gogs and had now time to continue on the port. The current version can be found here: https://github.com/idefix6/gogs-freebsdport But I face the problem that during the build process git cannot make a clone. For logfile please see here: > http://

<    1   2