On 2016-04-28 05:30, Willem Offermans wrote:
Dear Matthias and FreeBSD friends,
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 10:48:16AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 23.04.2016 um 12:02 schrieb Willem Offermans:
> Dear FreeBSD friends,
>
> In my attempt to juvenile an old FreeBSD beast, I encountered another
>
On 2016-04-21 14:10, Jim Ohlstein wrote:
Hello,
On 4/21/16 1:31 PM, Alphons van Werven wrote:
Jim Ohlstein wrote:
Mailman logs show connection errors.
I don't know exactly how Postfix and Mailman (try to) communicate with
one
another, but is it possible that SysV IPC has to be enabled for
Hi,
"pkg audit" on my system returns the following CVE's for ffmpeg. I have
noted
in the list below that http://www.ffmpeg.org/security.html claims these
CVE's
were fixed in the ffmpeg version noted.
Is this the correct place/list to report updates to that vuxml can be
updated?
I know
On 2015-12-23 11:55, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Michael Jung <mi...@mikej.com> writes:
"pkg audit" on my system returns the following CVE's for ffmpeg. I
have noted
in the list below that http://www.ffmpeg.org/security.html claims
these CVE's
were fixed in the ffmp
On 2015-12-16 03:15, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Tuesday, December 15, 2015 a las 05:31:39PM -0500, Michael Jung
escribió:
> I still have a copy of the failed workspace.
>
>matthias
FWIW
# $FreeBSD: head/editors/libreoffice/Makefile 403436 2015-12-09
23:43:30Z jbeich $
buil
On 2015-12-15 09:02, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Monday, December 14, 2015 a las 06:59:48AM +0100, Matthias
Apitz escribió:
> > There are other (older) cases visible with Google showing the same
> > problem, for example:
> > https://forums-web2.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1025000.html
> > saying
On 2015-04-27 09:59, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:21:40AM -0400, Michael Jung wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but pkg 1.5.1 wants to remove
locked
packages. The packages are indeed really removed.
Thanks.
--mikej
pkg lock is used to lock packages against
Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but pkg 1.5.1 wants to remove
locked
packages. The packages are indeed really removed.
Thanks.
--mikej
pkg lock is used to lock packages against reinstallation, modification
or
deletion.
FreeBSD charon.corp.pai.local 10.1-RC1-p2 FreeBSD
I do not
On 2015-04-27 09:59, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:21:40AM -0400, Michael Jung wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but pkg 1.5.1 wants to remove
locked
packages. The packages are indeed really removed.
Thanks.
--mikej
pkg lock is used to lock packages against
FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE #0 r276896:
pkg 1.4.4 or pkg 1.4.6
poudriere 3.1.1 under 11.0-CURRENT r275419
On i386 only pkg complains with Fail to kill
children. I have checked some but not all packages
and they appear to be updated as expected so this
is a heads up.
I do not see this behaviour with
On 2015-01-19 09:20, Michael Jung wrote:
FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE #0 r276896:
pkg 1.4.4 or pkg 1.4.6
poudriere 3.1.1 under 11.0-CURRENT r275419
On i386 only pkg complains with Fail to kill children. I have
checked some but not all packages
and they appear to be updated as expected so
On 2014-12-23 10:20, Mark Martinec wrote:
Tijl Coosemans wrote:
This card is still supported by x11/nvidia-driver-304
Mark Martinec wrote:
Good suggestion! It does seem to draw screen and scroll
much faster than NV (although it seems to stall from time
to time (like unresponsive mouse) on a
I noted that when running 'pkg upgrade' only 50 candidates where
detected when I have 1158
ports installed. What am I missing?
My local repository 0local is built using poudriere 3.1-RC3
[root@charon ~]# pkg -v
1.4.0.rc3
[root@charon ~]# pkg update -f
Updating 0local repository catalogue...
On 2014-10-31 15:33, Beeblebrox wrote:
graphics/png has been failing like this for some time, and I would go
around
the problem by fetching the newer binary then re-starting poudriere.
That
trick did not work this time, so now I'm stuck.
Same error when building on host (non-poudriere). Port
Hello:
Errors shown toward end of email.
Note this is a cleanly installed jail but an previously built repository
from an older
version of head. I can nuke the head repository and rebuild from
scratch but I wanted to
present these errors first.
--mikej
FreeBSD bsd11 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD
On 2014-10-30 13:10, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:53:29PM -0400, Michael Jung wrote:
Hello:
Errors shown toward end of email.
Note this is a cleanly installed jail but an previously built
repository
from an older
version of head. I can nuke the head repository
I hope this may be an additional data point.
I also had grave issues with NEW_XORG. When I did experience a problem 99% of
the
time the computer locked up. My uptime was never more than a 24 hour period.
No crash dumps, black screen, no keyboard light activity in toggling caps lock.
On 2014-08-20 12:34, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
Support may be added for earlier i386 releases once all ports properly
respect
On 2014-09-12 17:46, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 9/11/2014 8:51 AM, Michael Jung wrote:
Why does poudriere bulk need to bail because a single package has a
missing port origin and not continue to build other packages in the
package list?
If I remove x11/mate from my package list poudriere rocks
Why does poudriere bulk need to bail because of a single package that
has a missing port origin and not build other packages in the package
list?
If I remove x11/mate from my package list poudriere rocks on building
all my other ports.
The missing origin is a RUN_DEPENDS in the x11/mate
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Why does poudriere bulk need to bail because a single package has a
missing port origin and not continue to build other packages in the
package list?
If I remove x11/mate from my package list poudriere rocks on building
all my other ports.
The missing origin is a RUN_DEPENDS in the x11/mate
Following your instructions:
root@bsd11:/usr/home/mikej # pkg -v
1.3.6
root@bsd11:/usr/home/mikej # pkg update -f
Updating repository catalogue
Fetching meta.txz: 100% of 944 B
Fetching digests.txz: 100% of 2 MB
Fetching packagesite.txz: 100% of 5 MB
Adding new entries: 100%
Incremental update
NIX THIS!
Damn, I ran this on a box with the SSP repository configured. Hope no-one
wasted any time on this.
Pkg has updated on numerous other machines without incident.
:-(
-Original Message-
From: Michael Jung
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 1:10 PM
To: 'Ports FreeBSD'; p
On 2014-08-22 16:17, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 8/22/2014 1:16 PM, mikej wrote:
On , Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10
i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently.
Support may be
25 matches
Mail list logo
