(Sent to -questions@ on Oct 3 but hadn't got any reply, so sending
to @ports now. Also, situation below is before www/firefox was
updated to 41.0.)
I want to know if running "pkg audit" makes any sense for a port
installed that has not been updated officially yet. Also, is it
possible to
:
$FreeBSD: head/www/firefox/Makefile 378529 2015-02-06 12:08:43Z jbeich $
Bus error happens every time when trying to run firefox.
- parv
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
are apparently aware of
the problem to try later.
Thanks to whoever did that.
- parv
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
pkg-tools, ruby19 and portupgrade with no problems on
FreeBSD 8.3.
...
Thanks much, Gryd, for your find-iconv command.
- parv
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe
Introspection files
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/188522
... related or of any significance?
What is creating broken package contents (manifest?) of newly built
port to be installed? Or, how could I go finding the culprit?
- parv
Hi there,
in message e4a0824e48a6355c9daee75280b1b999.authentica...@ultimatedns.net,
wrote Chris H thusly...
I am the current maintainer of databases/p5-DBIx-Simple port (last
updated on CPAN is 1.35 in 2011).
Are there any user of the port? Have there been problems otherwise?
(If it
I am the current maintainer of databases/p5-DBIx-Simple port (last
updated on CPAN is 1.35 in 2011).
Are there any user of the port? Have there been problems otherwise?
(If it is not obvious, I am not an user.)
While here, would anybody want to pick up the maintainership?
--
in message 20140223095134.ga1...@holstein.holy.cow,
wrote parv@p thusly...
...
Forgot to add that I am not subscribed to ports@ list. Do send me
please a copy of your reply.
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
( Please do carbon copy me the replies for I am not a ports@
subscriber. )
Hi there,
Within The Ports, is it possible to compile and install devel/git
(with subversion Perl support) as (a collection of) static
port?
The problem that I want to workaround just appeared: I use git
(installed
-To-Repeat:
Compile www/firefox with above options environment,
and have it crash after/during start up with invalid system call.
Fix:
Unknown.
- parv
--
nsStringStats
= mAllocCount: 5
= mReallocCount:3
= mFreeCount: 3 -- LEAKED 2 !!!
= mShareCount
20120103175105.ga10...@dataix.net,
wrote Jason Hellenthal thusly...
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 03:41:05AM -1000, parv wrote:
++DOCSHELL 0x2d7cf800 == 1
++DOMWINDOW == 3 (0x2d140708) [serial = 3] [outer = 0x0]
zsh: invalid system call firefox
Does this repeat if you change your shell to /bin/sh ?
Yes
with installing the new port (without
force) while old one is installed. I don't understand the need to
remove old version while building the newer version. Could you
please clarify the issue?
- parv
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
) , (109 KB/s)
surfnet: (189 KB/s) , (171 KB/s)
switch: (180 KB/s) , (156 KB/s)
transact: (192 KB/s) , (173 KB/s)
ufpr: failed , failed
voxel: failed , (235 KB/s)
- parv
--
___
freebsd-ports
in message b79ecaef0904091219t4f20f65br36f6e2405ff60...@mail.gmail.com,
wrote Chris Rees thusly...
2009/4/9 Parv p...@pair.com:
in message b79ecaef0904080551x74c80227h1a4ba5d2adcca...@mail.gmail.com,
wrote Chris Rees thusly...
I recall from
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd
.pair.com/parv/comp/src/perl/check-portupgrade-00
... produces anything when run *without any arguments*?
Purpose of the program is to find a port name (based on directory
name in /var/db/pkg) which fails to match the regular expression
/^(.+)-([^-]+)$/ used in pkginfo.rb, among other files
instead for I thought
graphics/swfdec might have the option to use another method for
audio.
WELCOME TO THE TALKIES!
At this point, I could not care less for the pulseaudio problem.
- Parv
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
pulseaudio to produce sound through the above mentioned flash
plugin?
- Parv
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
?
Also, could you please file a PR via send-pr (do man send-pr) or
through the web interface ...
http://www.freebsd.org/support/bugreports.html
... (instructions such are there)?
- parv
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
to portupgrade doesn't
fail.
If portupgrade is indeed successful individually for all the above
listed ports, then the second scenario is more likely (the non-port
thing one).
- Parv
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
.
That would be darn too long not to install on my own (unless 7.1 is
coming out in a month)!
- Parv
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
engine, named captures, ability to relocate (which would be
interesting to see if that works or advisable within Ports
infrastructure).
- Parv
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
bloat.
Thanks much Helge for your efforts.
- Parv
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Chuck Robey thusly...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm using pkgdb because I wanted to try portupgrade, and it
required it.
portupgrade does not require pkgdb. pkgdb is part of portupgrade;
portupgrade installs pkgdb.
- Parv
the development
version of fvwm from x11-wm/fvwm2-devel (currently 2.5.23) instead
of the stable version.
- Parv
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote Anton
Berezin thusly...
...
I almost wish to rip off dual-life modules from our cores to
simplify situation.
Oh, that would be most wonderful (if not only to keep only one
(latest) version of module)!
- Parv
. Otherwise, install the module of course.
Perhaps that is what you had already written.
BTW, new stable version of Perl is 5.10.
- Parv
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
is aware willing)?
- Parv
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Ports,
Initially when I submitted the databases/p5-DBIx-Simple port,
committer had to make some changes. So, could somebody please test
before I submit a PR to upgrade the port to version 1.32? Here is
the patch ...
http://www103.pair.com/parv/comp/unix/freebsd/ports/patch-upgrade-p5
a situation that we have print/tex and
print/teTeX separately.
...
(finally some news)
Thanks much Hiroki for the update!
I will look forward to the upcoming ports, and if I could help with
testing.
- Parv
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
about that day of April. For a
while, I did get my knickers in a knot.
- Parv
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?
- Parv
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Doug Barton thusly...
Parv wrote:
I am using FreeBSD 6. I haven't tried xorg 7.2 port(s) yet, but
recently did merge /usr/X11R6 to /usr/local (programs reinstalled,
made link to X11R6 to local, and such). On a reboot after that,
scripts indeed ran
, ...
local_startup=/usr/local/etc/rc.d
local_periodic=/usr/local/etc/periodic
- Parv
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Rong-en Fan thusly...
On 5/3/07, Parv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently teTeX development/support ended on May 2006
(according to http://www.tug.org/tetex/)
...
Will there be any Tex Live port in our future? I did not find
anything suitable via
future? I did not find
anything suitable via search for tex live or texlive on
http://www.freebsd.org/ports/. To do my part, I volunteer to be a
tester of Tex Live port(s).
- Parv
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
the substitution in Ruby itself, or failing
that in Perl or awk.
- Parv
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Scott Bennett thusly...
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 Parv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
portmanager OPTIONALLY needs ruby to convert
pkgtools.conf (portupgrade) to its configuration format (by way
of running pkgtools-to-portmanager.rb
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote Parv thusly...
{PAGER:-less} $src/programmer-notes.txt # search 'pkgtools'
Curses, forgot a symbol! Above should be ...
${PAGER:-less} $src/programmer-notes.txt # search 'pkgtools'
- Parv
--
___
freebsd
(by way of
running pkgtools-to-portmanager.rb).
Good luck there are almost no dependencies for ruby itself:
Indeed, unlike python or the pig that is gnome.
- Parv
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
/local/lib/libnspr4.so.1 (0x1ada7000)
libpthread.so.2 = /lib/libpthread.so.2 (0x1addb000)
libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x1ae02000)
libsoftokn3.so.1 = /usr/local/lib/libsoftokn3.so.1 (0x1aef8000)
- Parv
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
{ $_ }++
, map { m/$parse/ ? split ' ' , $1 : () } @list ;
__END__
- Parv
--
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
41 matches
Mail list logo