Re: looking for a tool which handles pdf files

documents. Cheers, Ulrich Spoerlein -- It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak, and remove all doubt. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail

Re: Rubygems and trouble with rdoc node renumbering

On Sat, 26.04.2008 at 00:18:25 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 09:59:33PM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: I'm trying to update rubygem-rgl and the rdoc part is giving me a headache, as the rdoc will obviously use readdir() only to walk the directory tree

Re: Utility for safe updating of ports in base system

rebuild after every commit (to Makefile, or some suitable file of the port) foo.tbz: category/foo/Makefile Though this will trigger quite a hefty rebuild, if you ever touch the Makefile of the gettext port for example. Cheers, Ulrich Spoerlein -- It is better to remain silent and be thought

Re: TeTeX and TeXLive

? Something minimal that can be used by other ports to typeset documentation (how common is this, anyway?) and 3-4 big TeXLive ports for the typical TeX user. Cheers, Ulrich Spoerlein -- It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak, and remove all doubt

Re: OpenLDAP 2.3/pam_ldap/nss_ldap: not working in FreeBSD 7.0-PRE!

is running with nss_ldap-1.257 and showing no problems either. Cheers, Ulrich Spoerlein -- It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak, and remove all doubt. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

struct wi_req: how to deal with removal, affects multiple ports

because of the missing definition, I guess. bsd-airtools has recently been flagged as broken, too. Presumably due to the same reason. How should these ports deal with this? Both are calling SIOCGWAVELAN with wi_type set to WI_RID_COMMS_QUALITY. Cheers, Ulrich Spoerlein -- It is better to remain

Re: More speed increases for make-ing ports

Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: The question is: Has it been fixed in all Branches that are currently supported by the Ports tree? What about 5.x? Anyway, if you are running 5.x, why not try it out? Try makefile like: a=abc all: echo ${a:Mab}, ${a:Mabc

Re: More speed increases for make-ing ports

it been fixed in all Branches that are currently supported by the Ports tree? What about 5.x? Ulrich Spoerlein -- The trouble with the dictionary is you have to know how the word is spelled before you can look it up to see how it is spelled. -- Will Cuppy

Re: Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies?

On 5/16/07, Matthew D. Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 10:13:41AM +0200 I heard the voice of Ulrich Spoerlein, and lo! it spake thus: True, true. And as pointed out above, if you don't build the INDEX with your current pkg options, it is useless anyway. Oh, worse

Re: Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies?

On 5/16/07, Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting J. Porter Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Wed, 16 May 2007 06:25:32 -0500): What I don't like about the flattening of the dependencies is that there seems to be information loss; that is, I can't figure out why one port (e.g.,

Re: Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies?

Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Ulrich Spoerlein [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wed, 16 May 2007 18:28:55 +0200): The problem not discussed so far is: some ports may not have all first order dependencies. So anyone wanting to change this should install a tinderbox and start testing fixing those

Re: Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies?

there is no need to change the structure of /var/db/pkg to use databases or anything like this. I haven't had time to look at your patches, but are your removing second order dependancies? This would cut down the tree size considerably. Ulrich Spoerlein -- The trouble with the dictionary is you have

Re: first? patch [ HEADS UP: xorg 7.2 ready for testing ]

for hijacking this thread. Ulrich Spoerlein -- The trouble with the dictionary is you have to know how the word is spelled before you can look it up to see how it is spelled. -- Will Cuppy ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Re: Time to abandon recursive pulling of dependencies?

, /usr/ports/ and it will first create gettext-x.y.tbz and stuff. Ie, it could resolve/build dependencies *before* even starting the build in editors/vim. This then quickly leads to parallel pkg builds working (think: make -j3 vim-7.x.y.tbz) Ulrich Spoerlein -- The trouble with the dictionary is you

CFT: Parallel package building script

packages has to be done by some other means (pkg_update anyone?). Q: What about clustering? A: Easily possible, but would suck when using make(1) for the job. Ulrich Spoerlein -- The trouble with the dictionary is you have to know how the word is spelled before you can look it up to see how

Re: make index on FREEBSD_4_EOL

the actual error message? Ulrich Spoerlein -- The trouble with the dictionary is you have to know how the word is spelled before you can look it up to see how it is spelled. -- Will Cuppy ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman

Re: CFT: Parallel package building script

Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: I wrote a script That got stripped by the mailling lists ... second try. You can also fetch it from http://coyote.dnsalias.net/create_pkg_makefile.sh Ulrich Spoerlein -- The trouble with the dictionary is you have to know how the word is spelled before you can look

Re: parallel builds revisited

to implement two different strategies first, before releasing an early version to the public. Ulrich Spoerlein -- The trouble with the dictionary is you have to know how the word is spelled before you can look it up to see how it is spelled. -- Will Cuppy

bsdtar and packages vs. unionfs (was: Re: Cannot package converters/libiconv inside clean chroot)

it, bsdtar(1) extracts the symlink libcharset.so, and then tries to stat(2) instead of lstat(2) it, before libcharset.so.1 is extracted. The questions is: why? Ulrich Spoerlein -- The trouble with the dictionary is you have to know how the word is spelled before you can look it up to see how

Re: Difference between pkg_create and make package

would come in and we could fix this better. Until such time, you can probably share the ports tree between multiple machines via NFS and run 'make install' on each computer. On the other hand, it is rather seldom, that you find such differences between 'make install' and 'pkg_add'. Ulrich

Re: HEADSUP: removing the old cyrus-sasl port

it unnecessary hard to use one common var in /etc/make.conf for SASL2 support. Thanks, Ulrich Spoerlein -- The trouble with the dictionary is you have to know how the word is spelled before you can look it up to see how it is spelled. -- Will Cuppy

Re: How to create a patch that removes a file

, modify, add files with 'cvs add', delete them with 'cvs rm' - run 'port submit' It runs portlint, fills out the PR, CCs the maintainer, hints at added/removed files, etc. Highly recommended! Ulrich Spoerlein -- The trouble with the dictionary is you have to know how the word is spelled before

Re: Optionally depending on one of two ports (or none of them)

. It is trivial to fix, iff you assume that the user only installs software via ports and all the databases are consistent. Ulrich Spoerlein ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe

Re: FreeBSD Port: hal-0.5.8.20070104

is already checked on pointyhat). I have no idea how to accomplish 1), and have some ideas about 2), but implementing those is hindered by non-working unionfs on 6.x Ulrich Spoerlein -- A: Yes. Q: Are you sure? A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. Q: Why is top posting frowned

Re: linux-flashplayer9

and there is no sound and it is segfaulting _a lot_. I reverted back to version 7. Version 9 seems unusable right now. NB: This is on RELENG_6, perhaps the enhanced Linuxulator lets version 9 work stable on -CURRENT? Ulrich Spoerlein -- A: Yes. Q: Are you sure? A: Because it reverses the logical flow

Updating packages without a ports tree

project. Bye, Ulrich Spoerlein -- A: Yes. Q: Are you sure? A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports

Re: FreeBSD Port: net/samba3 (rc.d weirdness)

=${symon_enable:-NO} I'll CC the maintainer ... Ulrich Spoerlein -- A: Yes. Q: Are you sure? A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

Re: print/cups-base 1.2.0_2 and locally connected printer

, too. It is required for ulpt devices. Ulrich Spoerlein -- PGP Key ID: 20FEE9DD Encrypted mail welcome! Fingerprint: AEC9 AF5E 01AC 4EE1 8F70 6CBD E76E 2227 20FE E9DD Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Don't know. Don't care. pgp0ltpPz2fBJ.pgp Description: PGP