Hi.
It has been a while since seamonkey was removed from ports.
I attempted to build latest seamonkey but it fails with compiler error.
I'm wondering if anyone keeping up to date local seamonkey port and also
wishing to share.
Hiro
___
Hi Walery,
As a maintainer of Japanese/gawk, I tested both Japanese/gawk and lang/gawk.
Neither of ports had problems you described.
Thanks,
Hiro
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:53:18 +0400
Walery Kokarev w65...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody!
Today I tried to 'make install' in /usr/ports/lang/gawk
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:57:51 -0400
Coleman Kane cok...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 19:30 +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
* Pav Lucistnik (p...@freebsd.org) wrote:
This would break very fast -- it's passing -j3 to port Makefile
instead
of vendor Makefile.
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:56:01 -0500
Thomas Abthorpe tabtho...@freebsd.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On February 17, 2009 10:19:34 pm Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
Let me try these, first.
japanese/gawk
lang/mawk
lang/nawk
Thanks,
Hiro
They are yours
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:32:13 -0500
Thomas Abthorpe tabtho...@freebsd.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
How do I know this? I was one, a silent observer on the mailing lists, and in
on IRC. Then one day, I answered a similar plea,
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 12:32:13 -0500
Thomas Abthorpe tabtho...@freebsd.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The gauntlet has been thrown down, who among you is prepared to pick it up?
Let me try these, first.
japanese/gawk
lang/mawk
lang/nawk
Thanks,
Hiro
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 07:44:17 +0100
Gábor Kövesdán [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yoshihiro Ota escribió:
Hello, forks.
There are 2 directories for apache-tomcat like the following.
% ls -d */*tomcat*
java/eclipse-sysdeo-tomcat www/tomcat41
www/jakarta-tomcat4 www
Hello, forks.
There are 2 directories for apache-tomcat like the following.
% ls -d */*tomcat*
java/eclipse-sysdeo-tomcat www/tomcat41
www/jakarta-tomcat4 www/tomcat55
www/jakarta-tomcat5 www/tomcat6
www/tomcat-native
When I diffed ver. 5 dirs, they looked similar
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:45:46 +0100
Benjamin Lutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 12 March 2008 14:01:57 Florent Thoumie wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Benjamin Lutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch has been sitting in GNATS for a couple of months now:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 23:38:22 +0100
Juergen Lock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 09:21:20PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
Hi!
Anyway the update is here (also queued on tb3):
http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/qemu/qemu-devel-20080302.patch
Updated patch available, fixed
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:23:37 -0700
James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 21:14 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Atanas Gendov wrote:
Greetings to all from FreeBSD Ports!!! :)
I have some problems with icu - 3.8. After
Dear Multi-core Computer Users:
Ports+ is the first and the only port upgrading tool to fetch, configure,
compile, and install packages via ports in parallel.
There are some tools that allows downloading archives in parallel.
However, none of others builds, nor installs packages in concurrent
Yes, there is.
Take a look at http://uyota.asablo.jp/blog/cat/portsplus/.
I have written the program and finally came to a satisfying stage.
I was thinking to seek for testers after writing some more tips
and examples.
You can give a try.
I've been using/developing it for a half year.
Hiro
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:58:57 +0100
Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One shortcoming is the lack of locking making parallell builds a bit unsafe.
If you try to build both port A and port B at the same time, and both A and
B depends (directly or indirectly) on port C which is not
This a bit off the topic; however, I pointed out the problem of this mount_XXX
behaviour quite long time ago. It currently maintains a list of NON-supported
FS by nmount(2). Instead, it's better to maintain a list of SUPPORTED FS by
nmount.
In the current scheme, mount has to be aware of all
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 02:35:30 -0500
Matthew D. Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 10:14:28PM -0400 I heard the voice of
Yoshihiro Ota, and lo! it spake thus:
Matthew D. Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, it's not. Lots of ports change dependancies based on what's
tools like portupgrade and portmaster handle difficult
cases. They are better for intarctive use. For instance,
I can never do --recursive option in portupgrade in ports+.
It is something impossible for a 'make' utiltiy to do.
Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:57:34 -0700
Doug
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 10:59:36 -0500
Matthew D. Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:48:47PM -0400 I heard the voice of
Yoshihiro Ota, and lo! it spake thus:
Q. Is it safe to assume all dependencies are STATIC?
A. Yes, it is.
No, it's not. Lots of ports change
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:47:14 -0700
Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:17:50 -0700
Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
Portupgrade is not only slow reading INDEX file but also on dependency
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:57:34 -0700
Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
I think portmaster is also one tries to read and do the same things
but with shell script.
Not exactly the same things. Portmaster doesn't keep any external
database, it only updates what
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:17:50 -0700
Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
To Whom Slowness of Portupgrade Concerns a Lot:
As I got tired of long waiting of portupgrade trying to resolve
dependencies, I came up with
yet another tool for upgrading FreeBSD ports
To Whom Slowness of Portupgrade Concerns a Lot:
As I got tired of long waiting of portupgrade trying to resolve dependencies, I
came up with yet another tool for upgrading FreeBSD ports system. Unlink other
tools, it tries to maximize existing resource to maximize its performance.
This
This is the fastest one.
It is about O(1) and takes a couple of seconds to delete files whether millions
or billions.
1.) Set WRKDIRPREFIX like WRKDIRPREFIX=/ports in /etc/make.conf
2.) Give a device to it. It could be via mdconfig as well.
For example, mount /dev/ad0s2c /ports
3.) Build
23 matches
Mail list logo
