I saw svn support was added to Makefile.
But I'd rather use git for this purpose.
Do I have any chance whatsoever at my patch being accepted?
And what I need to do for accepting?
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 319d65e..e639a57 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -152,6 +152,7 @@
Hi list.
It will be wonderful. When src had moved to svn, nobody cared about make
update command.
I wish to had this in ports makefile:
--- /usr/ports/Makefile 2012-06-07 09:26:08.983664775 +0300
+++ /tmp/Makefile 2012-06-28 15:25:03.0 +0300
@@ -153,6 +153,7 @@
CVS?= cvs
SUP?=
Ok.
I'll be submitting a pr when ports move to svn.
Without testing, this patch is not more than dirty code.
On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 07:55 -0700, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 28 June 2012 05:33, mbsd m...@isgroup.com.ua wrote:
Hi list.
It will be wonderful. When src had moved to svn, nobody cared
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 06:45:20PM +0300, mbsd wrote:
Ok.
I'll be submitting a pr when ports move to svn.
Without testing, this patch is not more than dirty code.
On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 07:55 -0700, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 28 June 2012 05:33, mbsd m...@isgroup.com.ua wrote
You can use portupgrade -r[R] your_package.
Or portupgrade -f `pkg_glob 'p5-*'` after upgrade your main package
or something else (perl-after-upgrade).
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 11:09 -0700, jsb...@speakeasy.net wrote:
Each time I've upgraded ruby, python, and perl I've encountered
lengthy =
, NULL, dictmask))
- return EXIT_SUCCESS;
- else
- return EXIT_FAILURE;
+ return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 11:03 +0400, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
mbsd wrote on 11.06.2012 17:03:
Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
Does
Hi, for me it doesn't build with clang nor with gcc.
clang++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I/usr/local/include/sigc++-2.0
-I/usr/local/lib/sigc++-2.0/include -Wall -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT
-DORBIT2=1 -I/usr/local/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/atk-1.0
-I/usr/local/include/cairo
