It was recently posted on,
http://blogs.freebsdish.org/portmgr/2012/09/01/change-to-the-header-in-ports-makefiles/
that we would adopt a new header for the ports Makefiles. The initial
discussion seemed to show enough support for the idea of completely
stripping the header, leaving only the
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 04:22:45PM +, Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
[...]
Sometimes, as a result of a repocopy, or changed maintainership, the
Created By and MAINTAINER is no longer in synchronisation. To avoid
confusion, the first line can be removed, to ensure only the MAINTAINER
is
On 2012-09-01 08:42, Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
An idea has been floating around for some time, and it was brought up again
on the ports@ mailing list recently, please remove the extraneous header
information from the Makefile, leaving only the $FreeBSD$ id on the first
line.
It is an idea that
On Saturday, September 01, 2012 06:42:57 Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
Also bear in mind that Redports/QAT queues a job for every change done to a
Makefile, we do not want to overburden the QAT at this time. It is important
to allow this service to run at peek efficiency at this time to ensure it's
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 07:27:40AM -0400, Jason E. Hale wrote:
On Saturday, September 01, 2012 06:42:57 Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
Also bear in mind that Redports/QAT queues a job for every change done to a
Makefile, we do not want to overburden the QAT at this time. It is important
to allow
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 06:42:57AM +, Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
An idea has been floating around for some time, and it was brought up again
on the ports@ mailing list recently, please remove the extraneous header
information from the Makefile, leaving only the $FreeBSD$ id on the first
line.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As far as I'm concerned, the commiters will take care of this when
they need to. Leaving current port headers in-tact is the best way to
go regardless of this discussion...
On 09/01/2012 10:00 PM, Thomas Abthorpe wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at
