Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
graphics/backfract/Makefile:NO_INSTALL_MANPAGE= yes
Since you pasted it, thats a typo. Missing the 'S'
--
1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollu.
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 09:17:00AM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 09:28:34PM +, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
> > On Sun, 10 May 2009 15:22:04 -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Marcin Wisnicki
> > > wrote:
> > >> They will be installed since
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 09:28:34PM +, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
> On Sun, 10 May 2009 15:22:04 -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
>
> > On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Marcin Wisnicki
> > wrote:
> >> They will be installed since they are run dependencies.
> >>
> >>From what I can tell (from several meta
At 2009-05-10T21:28:34Z, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
> The proper way to make a metaport is to:
> 1. use only RUN_DEPENDS
> 2. set NO_BUILD
> 3. do *NOT* set NO_INSTALL
> 4. provide empty do-install target
In my personal metaports, I follow exactly the above prescription.
For example, I have a port op
On Sun, 10 May 2009 15:22:04 -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Marcin Wisnicki
> wrote:
>> They will be installed since they are run dependencies.
>>
>>From what I can tell (from several metaports) -- they, themselves, are
> not installed. The ports defined in the meta
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Marcin Wisnicki
wrote:
> On Sun, 10 May 2009 13:08:56 -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure if this is the 'right answer', but NO_INSTALL allows the
>> proper installation of numerous ports from one location (the meta-port).
>> An example of this is the misc
On Sun, 10 May 2009 13:08:56 -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is the 'right answer', but NO_INSTALL allows the
> proper installation of numerous ports from one location (the meta-port).
> An example of this is the misc/instant-server port (though
> unmaintained, IIRC).
>
> If you
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Marcin Wisnicki
wrote:
> Some metaports (like print/cups) use NO_INSTALL.
>
> This will prevent such port from registering its installation in /var/db/
> pkg, which is different behaviour from installing it from prebuilt
> package (where it registers just fine).
>
Some metaports (like print/cups) use NO_INSTALL.
This will prevent such port from registering its installation in /var/db/
pkg, which is different behaviour from installing it from prebuilt
package (where it registers just fine).
IMHO not registering installation makes no sense and serves only t
