On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 1:51 PM, CeDeROM cede...@tlen.pl wrote:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote:
You're misunderstanding a few things. There are no release packages
for any release of FreeBSD. What you have on the install discs are
just snapshot
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote:
It doesn't look like the FreeBSD ports SVN repository is used to its
full potential. (...)
Yea, btw why FreeBSD does not use GIT? I have been using it for some
time and I have not seen better source code revision utility.
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 2:08 PM, CeDeROM cede...@tlen.pl wrote:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote:
It doesn't look like the FreeBSD ports SVN repository is used to its
full potential. (...)
Yea, btw why FreeBSD does not use GIT? I have been using it for
Hi!
Yea, btw why FreeBSD does not use GIT?
http://wiki.freebsd.org/Git
points to some text that describes this topic:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/GitDrawbacks
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
___
On 28 December 2012 04:02, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote:
It doesn't look like the FreeBSD ports SVN repository is used to its
full potential. SVN allows branching and creation of experimental
versions of the tree very easily and cheaply, yet all the experimental
repositories
