On 01/08/2018 09:50, Matt Smith wrote:
> On Jan 08 14:44, Dave Horsfall wrote:
>> Why would /usr/local/etc/apache24/httpd.conf need to be removed if not
>> needed? Surely as I've just upgraded it, I might want it?
>
> The notes are for people installing the port/package for the very first
>
On Jan 08 14:44, Dave Horsfall wrote:
Why would /usr/local/etc/apache24/httpd.conf need to be removed if not
needed? Surely as I've just upgraded it, I might want it?
The notes are for people installing the port/package for the very first
time or for people removing the package. It's telling
Thanks, all; I've made a note to myself on my Mac's calendar to use
script/tee (something I always think of *after* the event, and on the Mac
as well).
Some random observations:
Why would /usr/local/etc/apache24/httpd.conf need to be removed if not
needed? Surely as I've just upgraded it, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 09:39:56 +1100
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Monday, 8 January 2018 at 8:48:04 +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> > I'm not quite sure what happened since my last weekly "pkg update"
> > etc but it sure got
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:39:56AM +1100, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
> > This was accompanied by zillions of notes, warning me to "do this" and
> > "avoid doing that" etc. Err, were those notes squirreled away somewhere,
> > or do I have to hope that I don't lose the window and its
On Monday, 8 January 2018 at 8:48:04 +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> I'm not quite sure what happened since my last weekly "pkg update" etc but
> it sure got busy:
>
> Checking for upgrades (198 candidates): 100%
> Processing candidates (198 candidates): 100%
> The following 110
I'm not quite sure what happened since my last weekly "pkg update" etc but
it sure got busy:
Checking for upgrades (198 candidates): 100%
Processing candidates (198 candidates): 100%
The following 110 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked):
New packages to be INSTALLED: