Hajimu UMEMOTO writes:
>> On Sun, 24 Dec 2017 12:12:44 -0400
>> Joseph Mingrone said:
>> - japanese/egg-canna/Makefile (does not build with emacs versions >= 23)
>> - japanese/migemo-emacs23
> jrm> Are you Ok if I remove these ports immediately,
Joseph Mingrone wrote
in <86d135nne8@phe.ftfl.ca>:
jr> A quick scan suggests that these port may have passed their usefulness.
jr> Could you speak up if they are still useful or if you feel they should
jr> be removed?
jr> - editors/psgml (use psgml-1.3.4.tar from
Liu Dryice writes:
> On 24 Dec 2017, 05:29 +0800, Joseph Mingrone , wrote:
> - deskutils/etask (non-mirrored tarball dead since 2007)
> This is still fetchable from distcache. Though I admit I haven't used
> it and haven't heard about it for quite a long
Hi,
> On Sun, 24 Dec 2017 12:12:44 -0400
> Joseph Mingrone said:
> - japanese/egg-canna/Makefile (does not build with emacs versions >= 23)
> - japanese/migemo-emacs23
jrm> Are you Ok if I remove these ports immediately, since Emacs version 23 was
removed from the
Joseph Mingrone writes:
> - japanese/egg-canna/Makefile (does not build with emacs versions >= 23)
> - japanese/migemo-emacs23
Are you Ok if I remove these ports immediately, since Emacs version 23 was
removed from the
ports tree in 2014.
Joseph
signature.asc
Description:
From: Joseph Mingrone <j...@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Are these Emacs ports still useful?
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 18:29:29 -0400
>>> A quick scan suggests that these port may have passed their usefulness.
>>> Could you speak up if they are still useful or if you feel th
Yasuhiro KIMURA <y...@utahime.org> writes:
> From: Joseph Mingrone <j...@freebsd.org>
> Subject: Re: Are these Emacs ports still useful?
> Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 18:29:29 -0400
>>>> A quick scan suggests that these port may have passed their usefulness.
>>
Hi,
I resend this message because it was rejected by ports list.
> On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 17:29:51 -0400
> Joseph Mingrone said:
jrm> - mail/xcite (no real updates since 2010, still useful?)
I'm using it. It is very useful at least for me.
I don't think no update means
Hi,
I resend this message because it was rejected by ports list.
> On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 17:29:51 -0400
> Joseph Mingrone said:
jrm> - mail/x-face-e21 (not fetchable)
It seems fetchable.
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO
u...@mahoroba.org u...@freebsd.org
From: Joseph Mingrone <j...@freebsd.org>
Subject: Are these Emacs ports still useful?
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 17:29:51 -0400
> A quick scan suggests that these port may have passed their usefulness.
> Could you speak up if they are still useful or if you feel they should
> be
[resending because original did not make it to the list]
Joseph Mingrone writes:
> Hajimu UMEMOTO writes:
>> Hi,
>>> On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 17:29:51 -0400
>>> Joseph Mingrone said:
>> jrm> - mail/xcite (no real updates since 2010,
[resending because original message did not make it to the list]
Joseph Mingrone <j...@freebsd.org> writes:
> Yasuhiro KIMURA <y...@utahime.org> writes:
>> From: Joseph Mingrone <j...@freebsd.org>
>> Subject: Are these Emacs ports still useful?
>>
[resending (with updates) because original message did not make it to the list]
Hello all,
A quick scan suggests that these port may have passed their usefulness.
Could you speak up if they are still useful or if you feel they should
be removed?
Regards,
Joseph
- sysutils/puppet-mode.el
Yasuhiro KIMURA <y...@utahime.org> writes:
> From: Joseph Mingrone <j...@freebsd.org>
> Subject: Are these Emacs ports still useful?
> Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 17:29:51 -0400
>> A quick scan suggests that these port may have passed their usefulness.
>> Could you
From: Joseph Mingrone <j...@freebsd.org>
Subject: Are these Emacs ports still useful?
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 17:29:51 -0400
> A quick scan suggests that these port may have passed their usefulness.
> Could you speak up if they are still useful or if you feel they should
> be
15 matches
Mail list logo