From: Scott Long
Subject: Re: Benchmark [Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD! take 4]
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 00:44:24 -0600
> Maho NAKATA wrote:
>> I did a benchmark with Virtualbox:
>> My environment:
>> * Core 2 Quad, q6...@3ghz
>> * Windows XP s...@hos
Hello,
> Usually I cannot usually launch VirtualBox even by root.
> A workaround is that invoking and killing VirtualBox
> many times for me. After some tries I can launch...
maybe this workaround helps (as user, not as root):
1. Launch VirtualBox.
2. If it fails open top(1)
3. In top(1) you shou
Maho NAKATA wrote:
I did a benchmark with Virtualbox:
My environment:
* Core 2 Quad, q6...@3ghz
* Windows XP s...@host s...@vbox with GuestAddon
* http://crystalmark.info/software/CrystalMark/
CrystalMark 2004R3
* Sapphire X1650
* VBOX is running on FBSD7.2-REL/amd64
using http
I did a benchmark with Virtualbox:
My environment:
* Core 2 Quad, q6...@3ghz
* Windows XP s...@host s...@vbox with GuestAddon
* http://crystalmark.info/software/CrystalMark/
CrystalMark 2004R3
* Sapphire X1650
* VBOX is running on FBSD7.2-REL/amd64
using http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/vbox
share with you.
The benchmark in question is a small one which generates a mandelbrot,
you can find it here:
http://www.timestretch.com/FractalBenchmark.html#346e82c069dbc3bc26fa841434a43ed5
1. Machine specs
OS: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE (Apr 29, 2007) i386 (32 bit)
Kernel: SMP + cpu I686_CPU
Hello,
Now that I'm back from having to serve in the armed services, I've
picked up work on parallel building for the ports again. There is some
conventional wisdom floating around these parts that says you should
run make -j with a number one higher than the number of CPUs you have.
As I wond
