Re: CURRENT (r249438): (devel/libiconv)./unistd.h:686:5: error: invalid token at start of a preprocessor expression : #if @GNULIB_EUIDACCESS@

2013-04-24 Thread O. Hartmann
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 21:03 +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: On Apr 17, 2013, at 21:16, Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2013-04-17 06:07:47 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote: On Apr 17, 2013, at 07:31, Jan Beich jbe...@tormail.org wrote: Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org writes: On Apr 16, 2013,

Re: CURRENT (r249438): (devel/libiconv)./unistd.h:686:5: error: invalid token at start of a preprocessor expression : #if @GNULIB_EUIDACCESS@

2013-04-23 Thread Dimitry Andric
On Apr 17, 2013, at 21:16, Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org wrote: On 2013-04-17 06:07:47 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote: On Apr 17, 2013, at 07:31, Jan Beich jbe...@tormail.org wrote: Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org writes: On Apr 16, 2013, at 00:42, Jan Beich jbe...@tormail.org wrote: ... Maybe

Re: CURRENT (r249438): (devel/libiconv)./unistd.h:686:5: error: invalid token at start of a preprocessor expression : #if @GNULIB_EUIDACCESS@

2013-04-17 Thread Dimitry Andric
On Apr 17, 2013, at 07:31, Jan Beich jbe...@tormail.org wrote: Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org writes: On Apr 16, 2013, at 00:42, Jan Beich jbe...@tormail.org wrote: ... Maybe -O3 overoptimizes regex in libc e.g., $ echo '#if @GNULIB_EUIDACCESS@' | sed 's/@GNULIB_EUIDACCESS@/0/' #if

Re: CURRENT (r249438): (devel/libiconv)./unistd.h:686:5: error: invalid token at start of a preprocessor expression : #if @GNULIB_EUIDACCESS@

2013-04-17 Thread Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-04-17 06:07:47 -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote: On Apr 17, 2013, at 07:31, Jan Beich jbe...@tormail.org wrote: Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org writes: On Apr 16, 2013, at 00:42, Jan Beich jbe...@tormail.org wrote: ... Maybe -O3 overoptimizes

Re: CURRENT (r249438): (devel/libiconv)./unistd.h:686:5: error: invalid token at start of a preprocessor expression : #if @GNULIB_EUIDACCESS@

2013-04-16 Thread Dimitry Andric
On Apr 16, 2013, at 00:42, Jan Beich jbe...@tormail.org wrote: O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de writes: ./unistd.h:694:5: error: invalid token at start of a preprocessor expression #if @GNULIB_EUIDACCESS@ ^ 1 error generated. Maybe -O3 overoptimizes regex in libc e.g., $ echo

Re: CURRENT (r249438): (devel/libiconv)./unistd.h:686:5: error: invalid token at start of a preprocessor expression : #if @GNULIB_EUIDACCESS@

2013-04-16 Thread O. Hartmann
On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 20:58 +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: On Apr 16, 2013, at 00:42, Jan Beich jbe...@tormail.org wrote: O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de writes: ./unistd.h:694:5: error: invalid token at start of a preprocessor expression #if @GNULIB_EUIDACCESS@ ^ 1 error

Re: CURRENT (r249438): (devel/libiconv)./unistd.h:686:5: error: invalid token at start of a preprocessor expression : #if @GNULIB_EUIDACCESS@

2013-04-16 Thread Jan Beich
Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org writes: On Apr 16, 2013, at 00:42, Jan Beich jbe...@tormail.org wrote: O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de writes: ./unistd.h:694:5: error: invalid token at start of a preprocessor expression #if @GNULIB_EUIDACCESS@ ^ 1 error generated. Maybe -O3

Re: CURRENT (r249438): (devel/libiconv)./unistd.h:686:5: error: invalid token at start of a preprocessor expression : #if @GNULIB_EUIDACCESS@

2013-04-15 Thread Jan Beich
O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de writes: Trying to recompile converters/libiconv on FreeBSD 10.0-CUR/r49438 (with bran new CLANG 3.3) results with the errors below. This error shows up on boxes having FBSD 10 and X11. It doesn't show up on those boxes running without a full X11 (that

CURRENT (r249438): (devel/libiconv)./unistd.h:686:5: error: invalid token at start of a preprocessor expression : #if @GNULIB_EUIDACCESS@

2013-04-13 Thread O. Hartmann
Trying to recompile converters/libiconv on FreeBSD 10.0-CUR/r49438 (with bran new CLANG 3.3) results with the errors below. This error shows up on boxes having FBSD 10 and X11. It doesn't show up on those boxes running without a full X11 (that is the only difference I can figure out at the moment