On Mon, 09 May 2011 07:30:41 -0700
Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote:
4.0.6 is still not as robust for me as 3.2.12, but it's now close and
the added features still make it a win for me. I have not had an
actual crash with 4.0.6, but I have had VMs simply deadlock.
Does 4.0.x bring support
On Fri, 20 May 2011 09:58:35 +0200, Gour-Gadadhara Dasa wrote:
On Mon, 09 May 2011 07:30:41 -0700
Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net wrote:
4.0.6 is still not as robust for me as 3.2.12, but it's now close and
the added features still make it a win for me. I have not had an
actual crash with
http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Changelog
4.0.8 just released
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Call-for-Testers-VirtualBox-4-0-6-tp4332763p4402785.html
Sent from the freebsd-ports mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Cool =) Thanks!
2011/5/17 Bernhard Froehlich de...@bluelife.at:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 23:45:08 -0700 (PDT), timp wrote:
http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Changelog
4.0.8 just released
Don't you think we know that?
http://svn.bluelife.at/index.cgi/blueports/revision/?rev=1316
--
Bernhard
On Mon, 16 May 2011 23:45:08 -0700 (PDT), timp wrote:
http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Changelog
4.0.8 just released
Don't you think we know that?
http://svn.bluelife.at/index.cgi/blueports/revision/?rev=1316
--
Bernhard Fröhlich
http://www.bluelife.at/
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:34:44AM +0200, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 23:45:08 -0700 (PDT), timp wrote:
http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Changelog
4.0.8 just released
Don't you think we know that?
http://svn.bluelife.at/index.cgi/blueports/revision/?rev=1316
Will this
On Tue, 17 May 2011 22:31:56 +0800, Denny Lin wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:34:44AM +0200, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 23:45:08 -0700 (PDT), timp wrote:
http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Changelog
4.0.8 just released
Don't you think we know that?
I think 4.0.6 is quite stable now. Is it really less stable than the
current version in ports 3.2.12?
Why don't you at least put them into ports/emulators repository with
-devel suffix like many other ports do? So that there is no need to go
through the third party repository.
Yuri
On Mon, 09 May 2011 05:57:05 -0700, Yuri wrote:
I think 4.0.6 is quite stable now. Is it really less stable than the
current version in ports 3.2.12?
There are a few regressions also in 4.0.6 but it's already a lot better
than 4.0.4. We have already decided last week to update the ports to
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 05:57:05 -0700
From: Yuri y...@rawbw.com
Sender: owner-freebsd-emulat...@freebsd.org
I think 4.0.6 is quite stable now. Is it really less stable than the
current version in ports 3.2.12?
Why don't you at least put them into ports/emulators repository with
-devel
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Ryan Stone ryst...@gmail.com wrote:
(Sorry for the noise earlier about the PBIs not working under PC-BSD;
I'm not sure how I missed that had been already reported).
I tried the new amd64 PBI and I am able to successfully start VMs now.
I had one VM(running
On 22/04/2011 13:01, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
It's about two months since the last call for testers and a lot of
bugfixing has happened since then. Not all of the reported problems were
FreeBSD related which is a good indication that we're not too far behind
the stability of the other hosts. So
On Friday 22 April 2011 07:01 am, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
It's about two months since the last call for testers and a lot of
bugfixing has happened since then. Not all of the reported problems
were FreeBSD related which is a good indication that we're not too
far behind the stability of the
(Sorry for the noise earlier about the PBIs not working under PC-BSD;
I'm not sure how I missed that had been already reported).
I tried the new amd64 PBI and I am able to successfully start VMs now.
I had one VM(running some relatively recent version of amd64 HEAD)
boot up fine, but a second
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:28:11 -0400, Ryan Stone wrote:
(Sorry for the noise earlier about the PBIs not working under PC-BSD;
I'm not sure how I missed that had been already reported).
I tried the new amd64 PBI and I am able to successfully start VMs now.
I had one VM(running some relatively
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Bernhard Froehlich de...@freebsd.orgwrote:
It's about two months since the last call for testers and a lot of
bugfixing has happened since then. Not all of the reported problems were
FreeBSD related which is a good indication that we're not too far behind
the
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 12:29:43 -0300, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
For me it is working...
running windows XP dnd linux over an old(4.0.2) image it is ok...
very stable...
Only a problem remains (that is not still fixed):
it is the problem with the vnc in VBoxHeadless
the cursor is
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:42:29 -0400, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Bernhard Froehlich
de...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:01:40 +0200, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
PBIs for PC-BSD are currently worked on and will hopefully be available
in a few days.
Thanks a
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 16:37:15 -0400, Jason Andresen wrote:
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:01:40 +0200
Bernhard Froehlich de...@freebsd.org wrote:
It's about two months since the last call for testers and a lot of
bugfixing has happened since then. Not all of the reported problems were
FreeBSD
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:01:40 +0200, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
PBIs for PC-BSD are currently worked on and will hopefully be available
in a few days.
Thanks a lot to Jesse Smith, Dru Lavigne and Ken Moore for the efforts
to provide the PBIs!
PC-BSD 8.x 32bit:
For me it is working...
running windows XP dnd linux over an old(4.0.2) image it is ok...
very stable...
Only a problem remains (that is not still fixed):
it is the problem with the vnc in VBoxHeadless
the cursor is not in sync (the vnc cursor) is not
in sync with the XP cursor..
It's about two months since the last call for testers and a lot of
bugfixing has happened since then. Not all of the reported problems were
FreeBSD related which is a good indication that we're not too far behind
the stability of the other hosts. So let's get it one once again.
Last time I asked
22 matches
Mail list logo
