Re: Dead projects in ports tree

2009-03-03 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:09:04 -0600, Garrett Cooper wrote: Just trying to amass cruft in the ports tree that could be marked deprecated and removed. Some assistance in amassing the list would be helpful... multimedia/openquicktime - no movement in CVS / SVN for 1+ years; no releases in th

Re: Dead projects in ports tree

2009-03-03 Thread Mark Linimon
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 11:40:42AM +0200, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote: > Frankly, I would glad to see absolutely another discussion: not about > dropping software that works (and as far as I understand, which port > is maintained), but about making needed but broken software work again > (e.g. valgrind

Re: Dead projects in ports tree

2009-03-03 Thread Renato Botelho
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 7:36 PM, David E. Thiel wrote: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 04:05:56PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> > multimedia/openquicktime - no movement in CVS / SVN for 1+ years; no >> > releases in the past 3 years >> > >> >    I'll continue posting more items to this thread as I find

Re: Dead projects in ports tree

2009-03-03 Thread Andrew W. Nosenko
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: >> I completely agree. So long as a port is being used and people find it >> useful, I think it would be a mistake to remove those ports. In fact I >> suspect it wouldn't be long before

Re: Dead projects in ports tree

2009-03-03 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On Monday, March 02, 2009 16:36:38 -0600 "David E. Thiel" > wrote: >> >> While I'm in favor of removing useless ports, there are several projects >> which are simply "done", and lack of development doesn't mean they're >> obsolete or useless

Re: Dead projects in ports tree

2009-03-02 Thread Paul Schmehl
--On Monday, March 02, 2009 16:36:38 -0600 "David E. Thiel" wrote: While I'm in favor of removing useless ports, there are several projects which are simply "done", and lack of development doesn't mean they're obsolete or useless. I completely agree. So long as a port is being used and peopl

Re: Dead projects in ports tree

2009-03-02 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Monday 02 March 2009 13:36:38 David E. Thiel wrote: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 04:05:56PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > > multimedia/openquicktime - no movement in CVS / SVN for 1+ years; no > > > releases in the past 3 years > > > > > >    I'll continue posting more items to this thread as I

Re: Dead projects in ports tree

2009-03-02 Thread David E. Thiel
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 05:30:46PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 02:35:38PM -0801, David E. Thiel wrote: > > I would like to hear what people feel the best method for getting rid > > of unused and irrelevant ports, though -- bump portrevision and mark > > BROKEN for a few mon

Re: Dead projects in ports tree

2009-03-02 Thread Mark Linimon
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 02:35:38PM -0801, David E. Thiel wrote: > I would like to hear what people feel the best method for getting rid > of unused and irrelevant ports, though -- bump portrevision and mark > BROKEN for a few months? How about marking them DEPRECATED and with an EXPIRATION_DATE, a

Re: Dead projects in ports tree

2009-03-02 Thread David E. Thiel
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 04:05:56PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote: > > multimedia/openquicktime - no movement in CVS / SVN for 1+ years; no > > releases in the past 3 years > > > >    I'll continue posting more items to this thread as I find them... > > Thanks, > > -Garrett > > xmms looks completely

Re: Dead projects in ports tree

2009-03-01 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 6:10 PM, wrote: > Garrett Cooper wrote: > >>     Just trying to amass cruft in the ports tree that could be >> marked deprecated and removed ... >> >> multimedia/openquicktime - no movement in CVS / SVN for 1+ years; >> no releases in the past 3 years > > This strikes me

Re: Dead projects in ports tree

2009-03-01 Thread Philipp Ost
Garrett Cooper wrote: Just trying to amass cruft in the ports tree that could be marked deprecated and removed. Some assistance in amassing the list would be helpful... [...] Another candidate would be lang/drscheme: - the port is not maintained any longer - it installs a rather old version

Re: Dead projects in ports tree

2009-03-01 Thread Patrick Lamaizière
Le Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:09:04 -0800, Garrett Cooper : [Dead projects] lang/smarteiffel (1.2r7) - does not fetch on the master site. - broken for a while with gcc4 except on i386 (known problem not specific to FreeBSD). - not updated to 1.2r8. - project dead. - only one user (me)? I think we can

Re: Dead projects in ports tree

2009-02-28 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Saturday 28 February 2009 15:05:56 Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > >    Just trying to amass cruft in the ports tree that could be marked > > deprecated and removed. Some assistance in amassing the list would be > > helpful... > > > > multimedia/

Re: Dead projects in ports tree

2009-02-28 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Saturday 28 February 2009 17:33:17 Robert Huff wrote: > per...@pluto.rain.com writes: > > > multimedia/openquicktime - no movement in CVS / SVN for 1+ years; > > > no releases in the past 3 years > > > > This strikes me as slim evidence on which to seek a death sentence :) > > > > While I ca

Re: Dead projects in ports tree

2009-02-28 Thread Robert Huff
per...@pluto.rain.com writes: > > multimedia/openquicktime - no movement in CVS / SVN for 1+ years; > > no releases in the past 3 years > > This strikes me as slim evidence on which to seek a death sentence :) > > While I can't testify to the usefulness of this particular port, > the fac

Re: Dead projects in ports tree

2009-02-28 Thread perryh
Garrett Cooper wrote: > Just trying to amass cruft in the ports tree that could be > marked deprecated and removed ... > > multimedia/openquicktime - no movement in CVS / SVN for 1+ years; > no releases in the past 3 years This strikes me as slim evidence on which to seek a death sentence :)

Re: Dead projects in ports tree

2009-02-28 Thread RW
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:25:09 -0500 Robert Huff wrote: > > Garrett Cooper writes: > > > >    Just trying to amass cruft in the ports tree that could be > > > marked deprecated and removed. Some assistance in amassing the > > > list would be helpful... > > > > xmms looks completely dead now.

Re: Dead projects in ports tree

2009-02-28 Thread Naram Qashat
Robert Huff wrote: Garrett Cooper writes: >Just trying to amass cruft in the ports tree that could be marked > deprecated and removed. Some assistance in amassing the list would be > helpful... xmms looks completely dead now. Can someone confirm or deny this fact? huff@>> dir /var/d

Re: Dead projects in ports tree

2009-02-28 Thread Robert Huff
Garrett Cooper writes: > >    Just trying to amass cruft in the ports tree that could be marked > > deprecated and removed. Some assistance in amassing the list would be > > helpful... > > xmms looks completely dead now. Can someone confirm or deny this > fact? huff@>> dir /var/dv/pkg | gre

Re: Dead projects in ports tree

2009-02-28 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >    Just trying to amass cruft in the ports tree that could be marked > deprecated and removed. Some assistance in amassing the list would be > helpful... > > multimedia/openquicktime - no movement in CVS / SVN for 1+ years; no > releases in

Dead projects in ports tree

2009-02-28 Thread Garrett Cooper
Just trying to amass cruft in the ports tree that could be marked deprecated and removed. Some assistance in amassing the list would be helpful... multimedia/openquicktime - no movement in CVS / SVN for 1+ years; no releases in the past 3 years I'll continue posting more items to this thr