I'm working on a port that has an option for a build_depends on another
port. If that option is selected, the dependent port MUST be built with an
option that is not selected by default.
Is there a way to either force that option to be selected in the dependent
port? Or, failing that, is it
Hello,
Le ven 30 nov 12 à 16:36:32 +0100, Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com
écrivait :
I'm working on a port that has an option for a build_depends on another
port. If that option is selected, the dependent port MUST be built with an
option that is not selected by default.
Is there
Thierry Thomas thie...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hello,
Le ven 30 nov 12 à 16:36:32 +0100, Paul Schmehl
pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com écrivait :
I'm working on a port that has an option for a build_depends on
another port. If that option is selected, the dependent port MUST
be built with an option
--On November 30, 2012 4:47:40 PM +0100 Thierry Thomas
thie...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hello,
Le ven 30 nov 12 à 16:36:32 +0100, Paul Schmehl
pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com écrivait :
I'm working on a port that has an option for a build_depends on another
port. If that option is selected, the
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Thierry Thomas thie...@freebsd.org wrote:
However, to enforce the right dependency, this option have to produce a
different plist.
Really? Isn't enough to depend on the package name instead of a file?
--
Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer avi...@freebsd.org
Le ven 30 nov 12 à 19:07:20 +0100, Alberto Villa avi...@freebsd.org
écrivait :
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Thierry Thomas thie...@freebsd.org wrote:
However, to enforce the right dependency, this option have to produce a
different plist.
Really? Isn't enough to depend on the package
--On November 30, 2012 7:07:20 PM +0100 Alberto Villa avi...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Thierry Thomas thie...@freebsd.org
wrote:
However, to enforce the right dependency, this option have to produce a
different plist.
Really? Isn't enough to depend on the package
