On Tue, 1 Jul 2014, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
It's LOCALBASE that points to /home/gerald/10-i386, so I am really
puzzled about those @unexec rmdir's that want to remove my LOCALBASE.
You can try attached patch.
Cool. That fixes the issue in my tests.
Thinking a bit more about this: Doesn't
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Antoine Brodin wrote:
Build with a non-standard PREFIX and LOCALBASE in /home/gerald/10-i386,
make ports builds have been failing with the following for a bit (for
lang/gcc49 among others):
Running regression-test, checking for orphans, checking pkg-plist.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Antoine Brodin wrote:
Build with a non-standard PREFIX and LOCALBASE in /home/gerald/10-i386,
make ports builds have been failing with the following for a bit (for
lang/gcc49 among others):
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, Antoine Brodin wrote:
In my case PREFIX points to /scratch. It's LOCALBASE that points to
/home/gerald/10-i386, so I am really puzzled about those @unexec rmdir's
that want to remove my LOCALBASE.
Why should any port or package meddle with LOCALBASE??
You can try
[ No ideas? Shall I just file a bug report? ]
Build with a non-standard PREFIX and LOCALBASE in /home/gerald/10-i386,
make ports builds have been failing with the following for a bit (for
lang/gcc49 among others):
Running regression-test, checking for orphans, checking pkg-plist.
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com wrote:
[ No ideas? Shall I just file a bug report? ]
Build with a non-standard PREFIX and LOCALBASE in /home/gerald/10-i386,
make ports builds have been failing with the following for a bit (for
lang/gcc49 among others):
