Re: FYI: qemu-ppc64-static and qemu-ppc-static "live-hang" when I attempt use with poudriere; qemu-arm-static and qemu-aarch64-static work

2018-11-04 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2018-Nov-4, at 1:06 AM, Thomas Zander wrote: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2017 at 01:37, Mark Millard wrote: > >> [I show some of the target/ppc/translate.c source code >> and related material this time. Not that I know enough >> to patch it correctly.] > > This is still an issue, correct? > I tried to

Re: FYI: qemu-ppc64-static and qemu-ppc-static "live-hang" when I attempt use with poudriere; qemu-arm-static and qemu-aarch64-static work

2017-08-31 Thread Mark Millard
[I show some of the target/ppc/translate.c source code and related material this time. Not that I know enough to patch it correctly.] On 2017-Aug-31, at 12:13 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > [Turns out that the emulated program counter is not progressing > for syscall emulation, at least for [some]

Re: FYI: qemu-ppc64-static and qemu-ppc-static "live-hang" when I attempt use with poudriere; qemu-arm-static and qemu-aarch64-static work

2017-08-31 Thread Mark Millard
[Just adding Sean Bruno in case the information is new to him. I top post a note for that.] Sean: The below reports on what I've found for what is happening for qemu-ppc64-static (and possibly others) when it gets stuck eating CPU time (and leaking memory), at least for the example I ran into

Re: FYI: qemu-ppc64-static and qemu-ppc-static "live-hang" when I attempt use with poudriere; qemu-arm-static and qemu-aarch64-static work

2017-08-31 Thread Mark Millard
[Turns out that the emulated program counter is not progressing for syscall emulation, at least for syscall falure cases.] On 2017-Aug-30, at 8:43 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2017-Aug-30, at 4:32 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > >> On 30 Aug, Mark Millard wrote: >>> On 2017-Aug-30, at 4:00 AM, Mark

Re: FYI: qemu-ppc64-static and qemu-ppc-static "live-hang" when I attempt use with poudriere; qemu-arm-static and qemu-aarch64-static work

2017-08-30 Thread Mark Millard
On 2017-Aug-30, at 4:32 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > On 30 Aug, Mark Millard wrote: >> On 2017-Aug-30, at 4:00 AM, Mark Linimon wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:09:40AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: It appears that qemu-ppc64-static and qemu-ppc-static from emulators/qemu-user-static

Re: FYI: qemu-ppc64-static and qemu-ppc-static "live-hang" when I attempt use with poudriere; qemu-arm-static and qemu-aarch64-static work

2017-08-30 Thread Don Lewis
On 30 Aug, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2017-Aug-30, at 4:00 AM, Mark Linimon wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:09:40AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >>> It appears that qemu-ppc64-static and qemu-ppc-static from >>> emulators/qemu-user-static are broken. >> >> Correct, and

Re: FYI: qemu-ppc64-static and qemu-ppc-static "live-hang" when I attempt use with poudriere; qemu-arm-static and qemu-aarch64-static work

2017-08-30 Thread Mark Linimon
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 03:09:40AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > It appears that qemu-ppc64-static and qemu-ppc-static from > emulators/qemu-user-static are broken. Correct, and known for some time. (fwiw sparc64 hangs as well.) mcl ___

FYI: qemu-ppc64-static and qemu-ppc-static "live-hang" when I attempt use with poudriere; qemu-arm-static and qemu-aarch64-static work

2017-08-30 Thread Mark Millard
qemu-ppc64-static and qemu-ppc-static "live-hang" when I attempt use them with poudriere, hanging at the command (showing an example process id): /usr/local/bin/qemu-ppc-static /bin/ps -ww -p 47841 -o jid= which eats CPU time and grows memory SIZE over time. Examples from after waiting a while