On 22.03.2011 16:09, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
22.03.2011 00:58, Heino Tiedemann пишет:
Gritsuk Antongni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19.03.2011 02:47, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
It calles itself not loger Release Candidate:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:2.0)
On 23.03.2011 13:05, Gritsuk Anton wrote:
On 22.03.2011 16:09, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
22.03.2011 00:58, Heino Tiedemann пишет:
Gritsuk Antongni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19.03.2011 02:47, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
It calles itself not loger Release Candidate:
Build identifier:
22.03.2011 00:58, Heino Tiedemann пишет:
Gritsuk Antongni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19.03.2011 02:47, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
It calles itself not loger Release Candidate:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/4.0
RC1 doesn't call itself release
On 19.03.2011 02:47, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
It calles itself not loger Release Candidate:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/4.0
RC1 doesn't call itself release candidate either:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101
Gritsuk Anton gni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19.03.2011 02:47, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
It calles itself not loger Release Candidate:
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/4.0
RC1 doesn't call itself release candidate either:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11;
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:07:28 -0600
Edwin L. Culp W. edwinlc...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm assuming that we are close to having firefox4 in the tree as
firefox. It can't be too soon. I have not found any drawbacks to it
in the couple weeks of testing.
Unfortunately, it still goes crazy like the
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:28:04AM -0700, Patrick Powell wrote:
On 03/19/11 00:02, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:07:28 -0600
Edwin L. Culp W.edwinlc...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm assuming that we are close to having firefox4 in the tree as
firefox. It can't be too soon. I have
I screwed up. This should have gone to ports. Sorry, Heino.
2011/3/18 Edwin L. Culp W. edwinlc...@gmail.com:
2011/3/6 Heino Tiedemann rotkaps_spam_t...@gmx.de:
Sergey Nikolenko s...@swa.org.ru wrote:
On 06.03.2011 19:17, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
Any manpage or howto how I can gat this on my
Edwin L. Culp W. edwinlc...@gmail.com wrote:
I screwed up. This should have gone to ports. Sorry, Heino.
2011/3/18 Edwin L. Culp W. edwinlc...@gmail.com:
2011/3/6 Heino Tiedemann rotkaps_spam_t...@gmx.de:
Sergey Nikolenko s...@swa.org.ru wrote:
On 06.03.2011 19:17, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
2011/3/18 Heino Tiedemann rotkaps_spam_t...@gmx.de:
Edwin L. Culp W. edwinlc...@gmail.com wrote:
I screwed up. This should have gone to ports. Sorry, Heino.
2011/3/18 Edwin L. Culp W. edwinlc...@gmail.com:
2011/3/6 Heino Tiedemann rotkaps_spam_t...@gmx.de:
Sergey Nikolenko s...@swa.org.ru
Edwin L. Culp W. edwinlc...@gmail.com wrote:
I installed the ReleaseCandidate1 from firefox-devel. Is thery any
change in since the move from firefox-devel to www/firefox, that I
should rebuild the RC1?
I would assume not because, I ereased firefox-devel from ports a few
hours ago and
2011/3/18 Christian Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de:
Edwin L. Culp W. edwinlc...@gmail.com wrote:
I installed the ReleaseCandidate1 from firefox-devel. Is thery any
change in since the move from firefox-devel to www/firefox, that I
should rebuild the RC1?
I would assume not because, I
na...@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote:
Edwin L. Culp W. edwinlc...@gmail.com wrote:
I installed the ReleaseCandidate1 from firefox-devel. Is thery any
change in since the move from firefox-devel to www/firefox, that I
should rebuild the RC1?
I would assume not because, I
Heino Tiedemann rot...@gmx.de wrote:
However, the _only_ difference is the addition of a FIREFOX_4_0_RELEASE
tag to .hgtags. So don't bother rebuilding.
One more difference is:
There are *no* other differences. I diff(1)ed the source trees.
It calles itself not loger Release
are not going to commit a Firefox 4 Beta or RC to the ports tree. If
you like to test Firefox 4 use the one from the development repository
at your own risk.
Cool.
Any manpage or howto how I can gat this on my computer? Do I need SVN
for that
1. cd /usr/ports/devel/subversion; make install clean
Heino Tiedemann rot...@gmx.de wrote:
https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/freebsd-gecko/branches/experimental/www/firefox-devel/
Alternatively, just use the Download in other formats: Zip Archive
link on the abovementioned page.
I cannot find it - where exactly?
It's actually a
/
We are not going to commit a Firefox 4 Beta or RC to the ports tree. If
you like to test Firefox 4 use the one from the development repository
at your own risk.
Cool.
Any manpage or howto how I can gat this on my computer? Do I need SVN
for that
1. cd /usr/ports/devel/subversion; make
://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/freebsd-gecko/branches/experimental/www/firefox-devel/
We are not going to commit a Firefox 4 Beta or RC to the ports tree. If
you like to test Firefox 4 use the one from the development repository
at your own risk.
Cool.
Any manpage or howto how I can gat
Zhihao Yuan lich...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Heino Tiedemann
Yes, it is Fast! I belive it is even faster on startup...
One Question:
Do I HAVE TO put it into my ports tree? Or can I put it somewhere into
my home directory tree?
e.g.
1 cd ~/myports/www
2 svn co
Sergey Nikolenko s...@swa.org.ru wrote:
Firefox 4 lives at:
https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/freebsd-gecko/branches/experimental/www/firefox-devel/
Any manpage or howto how I can gat this on my computer? Do I need SVN
for that
1. cd /usr/ports/devel/subversion; make install clean
-devel/
We are not going to commit a Firefox 4 Beta or RC to the ports tree. If
you like to test Firefox 4 use the one from the development repository
at your own risk.
Cool.
Any manpage or howto how I can gat this on my computer? Do I need SVN
for that
Heino
repository. Please have a look at this page for more information about
the freebsd-gecko repository:
https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/freebsd-gecko/
Firefox 4 lives at:
https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/svn/freebsd-gecko/branches/experimental/www/firefox-devel/
We are not going to commit a Firefox 4 Beta
Sergey Nikolenko s...@swa.org.ru wrote:
On 06.03.2011 19:17, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
Any manpage or howto how I can gat this on my computer? Do I need SVN
for that
1. cd /usr/ports/devel/subversion; make install clean
2. cd /usr/ports/www
3. svn co
Hi,
is there someone who likes to go for the Firefox 4 in ports?
maybe into www/firefox-devel?
Firefox 4 is in the State beta 12 - what means it is the release
candidate.
I use it already on Windows in the Office. Very good stuff! :)
Heino
___
how about the gecko repo ?
http://wiki.freebsd.org/Gecko
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Heino Tiedemann rotkaps_spam_t...@gmx.dewrote:
Hi,
is there someone who likes to go for the Firefox 4 in ports?
maybe into www/firefox-devel?
Firefox 4 is in the State beta 12 - what means it is the
On 5 Mar 2011 11:57, Martin Wilke m...@freebsd.org wrote:
how about the gecko repo ?
http://wiki.freebsd.org/Gecko
?
Error 503 Service Unavailable
Service Unavailable
Guru Meditation:
XID: 824546156
Chris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 12:48:43 +0100
Heino Tiedemann rotkaps_spam_t...@gmx.de articulated:
Hi,
is there someone who likes to go for the Firefox 4 in ports?
maybe into www/firefox-devel?
Firefox 4 is in the State beta 12 - what means it is the release
candidate.
I use it already on
openjdk is working very well with FreeBSD.
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Jerry freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.netwrote:
On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 12:48:43 +0100
Heino Tiedemann rotkaps_spam_t...@gmx.de articulated:
Hi,
is there someone who likes to go for the Firefox 4 in ports?
maybe
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 07:25:47AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
Will this new version alleviate the long standing problem of java not
working? If not, perhaps time might be better spend getting the latest
version of java working correctly with Firefox before wasting more
time porting products that
4 Beta or RC to the ports tree. If
you like to test Firefox 4 use the one from the development repository
at your own risk.
HTH,
Beat
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send
/freebsd-gecko/branches/experimental/www/firefox-devel/
We are not going to commit a Firefox 4 Beta or RC to the ports tree. If
you like to test Firefox 4 use the one from the development repository
at your own risk.
If you really want to try the 4.0b12 out and are running linux emulation
Jerry freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 12:48:43 +0100
Heino Tiedemann rotkaps_spam_t...@gmx.de articulated:
Hi,
is there someone who likes to go for the Firefox 4 in ports?
maybe into www/firefox-devel?
Firefox 4 is in the State beta 12 - what means it
On 03/05/2011 12:49, Heino Tiedemann wrote:
Is there realy Java needed somewhere in the web?
Yes.
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the
33 matches
Mail list logo
