On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:09:45 -0700
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Gary Jennejohn freenet.de!gary.jennej...@agora.rdrop.com wrote:
mtools doesn't use config options. You have to set them on the
command line when you install the port.
When you install it, or when you build it?
Build, of
On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:24:26 -0700
Cynthia Flynn 1cynthia2fly...@telus.net wrote:
Steven Kreuzer wrote:
On Mar 19, 2009, at 4:06 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Gary Jennejohn gary.jennej...@freenet.de wrote:
Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
... Cynthia Flynn wrote:
[snip -
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 05:35:15PM -0700, Cynthia Flynn wrote:
Steven Kreuzer wrote:
On Mar 20, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Cynthia Flynn wrote:
Can someone confirm for me that a normal port install of mtools brings
up a configuration menu in which the WITHOUT_X11 option can be set? I
do not
Gary Jennejohn freenet.de!gary.jennej...@agora.rdrop.com wrote:
mtools doesn't use config options. You have to set them on the
command line when you install the port.
When you install it, or when you build it?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
Wesley Shields w...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 05:35:15PM -0700, Cynthia Flynn wrote:
Steven Kreuzer wrote:
On Mar 20, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Cynthia Flynn wrote:
Can someone confirm for me that a normal port install
of mtools brings up a configuration menu in which the
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Gary Jennejohn gary.jennej...@freenet.de wrote:
Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
... Cynthia Flynn wrote:
[snip - syslinux pulls in too much X11 stuff]
I think the extra dependencies that you find listed for syslinux:
[snip]
come
On Mar 20, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Cynthia Flynn wrote:
Steven Kreuzer wrote:
On Mar 19, 2009, at 4:06 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Gary Jennejohn gary.jennej...@freenet.de wrote:
Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
... Cynthia Flynn wrote:
[snip - syslinux pulls in too much X11 stuff]
I
Steven Kreuzer wrote:
Personally, I think it makes more sense for mtools to be
the full and complete representation
of the actual program.
Personnally i think that such opinion considerably harms the ports
system, by transforming some ports (fortunately not many) into
a kitchen sink of
Steven Kreuzer wrote:
Can we consider people who use the CLI an advanced user? If so, the
expectation that they will be able to build a port with -DWITHOUT_X11
is not unreasonable.
People who are more likely to use the GUI are the ones who will not be
aware of the WITHOUT_X11 knob.
On Mar 20, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Michel Talon wrote:
Steven Kreuzer wrote:
Can we consider people who use the CLI an advanced user? If so, the
expectation that they will be able to build a port with -DWITHOUT_X11
is not unreasonable.
People who are more likely to use the GUI are the ones who
Over the years, my default make.conf has accumulated options to tell
ports not to include X11 dependencies. It doesn't always work, but I'd
never have known that something like mtools had a GUI option.
NOX11= yes
NO_X11= yes
WITHOUT_X11=yes
I haven't reaped the older
Steven Kreuzer wrote:
On Mar 20, 2009, at 5:24 PM, Cynthia Flynn wrote:
Can someone confirm for me that a normal port install of mtools brings
up a configuration menu in which the WITHOUT_X11 option can be set? I
do not remember seeing any such thing, but it has probably been 6
months since I
Steven Kreuzer wrote:
when you do a make install for the mtools port, it does not prompt you
if you would like to build the port without X11.
I think enough users have expressed the opinion (which I share) that
it would be reasonable to add an OPTION to this effect. We're fairly
well into the
Gary Jennejohn gary.jennej...@freenet.de wrote:
Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
... Cynthia Flynn wrote:
[snip - syslinux pulls in too much X11 stuff]
I think the extra dependencies that you find listed for syslinux:
[snip]
come directly from mtools ...
Yeah. It looks like
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 01:11:38 +0100
Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 01:25:41PM -0700, Cynthia Flynn wrote:
[snip - syslinux pulls in too much X11 stuff]
I think the extra dependencies that you find listed for syslinux:
grep pkgdep
I would like to draw your attention to this posting in regards to the
syslinux FreeBSD port:
http://syslinux.zytor.com/archives/2009-March/011749.html
FWIW, that posting belongs to this thread:
http://syslinux.zytor.com/archives/2009-February/011548.html
Of more importance is H. Peter
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 01:25:41PM -0700, Cynthia Flynn wrote:
I would like to draw your attention to this posting in regards to the
syslinux FreeBSD port:
http://syslinux.zytor.com/archives/2009-March/011749.html
FWIW, that posting belongs to this thread:
17 matches
Mail list logo