Re: Help understanding ports tinderbox failure report?

2013-09-25 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 2013-Sep-23, 09:22, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 06:13:19PM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > ... > > > > > > So, if you set DOCS in make.conf (e.g. OPTIONS_UNSET= DOCS) all dialogs > > > where DOCS is the only option stay hidden. > > > > > > This way users who want to confi

Re: Help understanding ports tinderbox failure report?

2013-09-23 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 2013-Sep-23, 17:55, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:28:19 +0200 Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > On 2013-Sep-23, 11:16, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > >> On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:46:00 +0200 Pietro Cerutti wrote: > >>> On 2013-Sep-23, 10:23, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > Since you converted NOPORT

Re: Help understanding ports tinderbox failure report?

2013-09-23 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:28:19 +0200 Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 2013-Sep-23, 11:16, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:46:00 +0200 Pietro Cerutti wrote: >>> On 2013-Sep-23, 10:23, Tijl Coosemans wrote: Since you converted NOPORTDOCS, could you also add OPTIONS_DEFINE=DOCS? >>> >>>

Re: Help understanding ports tinderbox failure report?

2013-09-23 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 2013-Sep-23, 11:16, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:46:00 +0200 Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > On 2013-Sep-23, 10:23, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > >> On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:08:11 +0200 Pietro Cerutti wrote: > >>> On 2013-Sep-22, 17:55, David Wolfskill wrote: > Back in July, I filed PR

Re: Help understanding ports tinderbox failure report?

2013-09-23 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:46:00 +0200 Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 2013-Sep-23, 10:23, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:08:11 +0200 Pietro Cerutti wrote: >>> On 2013-Sep-22, 17:55, David Wolfskill wrote: Back in July, I filed PR ports/180642 (as the port maintainer for astro/gps

Re: Help understanding ports tinderbox failure report?

2013-09-23 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 2013-Sep-23, 10:23, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:08:11 +0200 Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > On 2013-Sep-22, 17:55, David Wolfskill wrote: > >> Back in July, I filed PR ports/180642 (as the port maintainer for > >> astro/gpsman) to update that port from 6.4.4 to 6.4.4.1. > > [snip] >

Re: Help understanding ports tinderbox failure report?

2013-09-23 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:08:11 +0200 Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 2013-Sep-22, 17:55, David Wolfskill wrote: >> Back in July, I filed PR ports/180642 (as the port maintainer for >> astro/gpsman) to update that port from 6.4.4 to 6.4.4.1. > [snip] >> I've attached a revised patch, to: >> * Perform the 6

Re: Help understanding ports tinderbox failure report?

2013-09-23 Thread Pietro Cerutti
On 2013-Sep-22, 17:55, David Wolfskill wrote: > Back in July, I filed PR ports/180642 (as the port maintainer for > astro/gpsman) to update that port from 6.4.4 to 6.4.4.1. [snip] > I've attached a revised patch, to: > * Perform the 6.4.4 -> 6.4.4.1 upgrade. > * Replace the "USE_TK_RUN" (& "USE_TK_

Help understanding ports tinderbox failure report?

2013-09-22 Thread David Wolfskill
Back in July, I filed PR ports/180642 (as the port maintainer for astro/gpsman) to update that port from 6.4.4 to 6.4.4.1. astro/gpsman is a tcl/Tk application; recently, a request was made to update such ports from "USE_TK_RUN" to "USES+= tk,run" (for example. In the process of doing that, I dis